Evangelists of the urban future. A decolonial critique of the smart city narrative in Santiago de Chile

References

• Ameel, L. 2017. “Towards a Narrative Typology of Urban Planning Narratives for, in and of Planning in Jätkäsaari, Helsinki.” Urban Design International 22 (4): 318–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ameel, L. 2021. The Narrative Turn in Urban Planning: Plotting the Helsinki Waterfront. Routledge Research in Planning and Urban Design. New York: Routledge; 173.
   Google Scholar
• Angelidou, M. 2015. “Smart Cities: A Conjuncture of Four Forces.” Cities 47: 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez-Gutiérrez, G. 2017. “Ciudad Digital: paradigma de la globalización urbana.” Bitácora Urbano Territorial 27 (1): 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Berrone, P., J. Ricart, A. Duch, and C. Carrasco. 2019. IESE Cities in Motion Index 2019. Nacarra: IESE.
   Google Scholar
• Bouskela, M., M. Casseb, S. Bassi, y M. Facchina. 2016. “La ruta hacia las Smart Cities: Migrando de una gestión tradicional a la ciudad inteligente.” Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2005. “Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition.” City 9 (1): 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe). 2018. “Reflexiones sobre el desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe.” Conferencias Magistrales 2016-2018: Santiago de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, C. 2016. “Hacia una nueva epistemología de la teoría urbana y arquitectónica.” Estoa 5 (9): 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Copaja-Alegre, M., and C. Esponda-Alva. 2019. “Tecnología e innovación hacia la ciudad inteligente. Avances, perspectivas y desafíos.” Bitácora Urbano Territorial 29 (2): 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., and F. Caprotti. 2019. “Smart City as Anti-Planning in the UK.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (3): 428–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818787506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa, S., J. Marar, et al. 2018. “Cidades Inteligentes: um desafio para a Ecologia dos Meios.” In Experimentações Narrativas, Roteiros, Mobilidade e Marketing, edited by V. Gosciola, 30–43. Aveiro: Ria Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2015. “New Urban Utopias of Postcolonial India: ‘entrepreneurial Urbanization’ in Dholera Smart City.” Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (1), doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2016. “The Smart Entrepreneurial City. Dholera and Other 100 Utopias in India.” In Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn, edited by S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, and C. McFarlane, 51–70. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Ramón, Armando. 2000. “Santiago de Chile: (1541–1991): historia de una sociedad urbana”. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Sudamericana 287 p.
   Google Scholar
• Duque, I. 2016. “Políticas urbanas en Movimiento: Bogotá y Medellín en la era de las Smart Cities.” In XIV Coloquio Internacional de Geocrítica: Las utopías y la construcción de la sociedad del futuro. Barcelona, 2–7 May 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Duque Franco, I., and C. Ortiz. 2020. “Medellín in the Headlines: The Role of the Media in the Dissemination of Urban Models.” Cities 96 (August 2019). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102431
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. 1983. “La evangelización latinoamericana” Historia general de la iglesia en América Latina. Tomo I: introducción general a la historia de la iglesia en América Latina CEHILA Ediciones Sígueme, Salamanca. http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/otros/20120215111615/7cap4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities: Strategic Implementation Plan Title. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Farrés Delgado, Y., and A. Matarán Ruiz. 2014. “Hacia una teoría urbana transmoderna y decolonial: una introducción.” Polis, Revista Latinoamericana 13 (37): 339–361.
   Google Scholar
• Frez, J., N. Baloian, and G. Zurita. 2014. “SmartCity: Public Transportation Network Planning Based on Cloud Services, Crowd Sourcing and Spatial Decision Support Theory.” In Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Personalisation and User Adapted Services, edited by R. Hervás, S. Lee, C. Nugent, and J. Bravo. UCAmI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8867. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Giffinger, R., C. Fertner, H. Kramar, R. Kalasek, N. Pichler-Milanović, and E. Meijers. 2007. Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. 2011. “Speculative Urbanism and the Making of the Next World City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (3): 555–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., and D. Pianezzi. 2017. “Smart Cities: Utopia or Neoliberal Ideology?” Cities 69 (December 2016): 79–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2014. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880. 4th ed. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, S. 2019. “Decolonising Territory: Dialogues with Latin American Knowledges and Grassroots Strategies.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (5): 790–814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518777623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hayat, P. 2016. “Smart Cities: A Global Perspective.” India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 72 (2): 177–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928416637930.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand up?” City 12 (3): 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2015. “Critical Interventions Into the Corporate Smart City.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irazábal, C., and P. Jirón. 2021. “Latin American Smart Cities: Between Worlding Infatuation and Crawling Provincialising.” Urban Studies 58 (3): 507–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020945201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jajamovich, G. P. 2016. “Puerto madero ‘en movimiento’: Movilidad de políticas y modelos urbanos en América Latina (1999–2012).” Revista INVI 31 (87): 59–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/invi.v0i0.950.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2007. “Culture Stories: Understanding Cultural Urban Branding.” Planning Theory 6 (3): 211–236.
   Google Scholar
• Jirón, P., W. A. Imilán, C. Lange, and P. Mansilla. 2021. “Placebo Urban Interventions: Observing Smart City Narratives in Santiago de Chile.” Urban Studies 58 (3): 601–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020943426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirón, P., N. Orellana, and W. Imilán. 2018. “Etnografía institucional como aproximación al habitar cotidiano.” Revista Temas Sociológicos 23: 215–245.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2015. “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 131–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künkel, J. 2015. “Urban Policy Mobilities.” Theoretische Grenzen und Rekonzeptualisierungen 3 (3): 75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. 2020. Chasing World-Class Urbanism. Global Policy Versus Everyday Survival in Buenos Aires. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. 280 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lieto, L. 2015. “Cross-border Mythologies: The Problem with Traveling Planning Ideas.” Planning Theory 14 (2): 115–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213513257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., C. McFarlane, and S. Marvin. 2016. “Introduction.” In Smart Urbanism Utopian Vision or False Dawn?, edited by S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, and C. McFarlane, 1–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, C., and L. Matthey. 2015. “Tales of the City. Storytelling as a Contemporary Tool of Urban Planning and Design.” Articulo - Journal of Urban Research [Online], Special issue 7. http://journals.openedition.org/articulo/2779 doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.2779
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., A. Luque-Ayala, and C. McFarlane. 2016. Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. 2013. “Policy Boosterism, Policy Mobilities, and the Extrospective City.” Urban Geography 34 (1): 5–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., and O. Söderström. 2017. “On Alternative Smart Cities from a Technology-Intensive to a Knowledge-Intensive Smart Urbanism.” City 21 (3-4): 312–328.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. 2000. “La colonialidad a lo largo y a lo ancho: el hemisferio occidental en el horizonte colonial de la modernidad.” In La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas, edited by Clacso, 55–85. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, S. 2017. “Persuasive Practitioners and the art of Simplification: Mobilizing the ‘Bogotá Model’ Through Storytelling.” Novos Estudos CEBRAP 36 (1): 59–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.25091/s0101-3300201700010003.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, I., D. Renó, J. Albino, et al. 2018. “Internet das Coisas: Os Beneficios dos Dispositivos Móveis-Wearables.” In Experimentações Narrativas, Roteiros, Mobilidade e Marketing, edited by V. Gosciola, 104–113. Aveiro: Ria Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Parada, J. 2017. “Innovaciones sociales para territorios ‘inteligentes’: ¿Ficción o realidad?” Problemas del Desarrollo 48 (190): 11–35.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2011. “Geographies of Policy.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (6): 773–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2000. “Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social.” En Cuestiones y horizontes: de la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder, edited by CLACSO, Vol. 13, 246. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. doi:https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2002.130299
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2012. “Lo indio es parte de la modernidad, no es una tradición estancada.” In seminario ‘La Cuestión de la Ideología’ organized by P.H.D. Program in Social Sciences. Santiago: FACSO. http://www.facso.uchile.cl/noticias/85824/lo-indio-es-parte-de-la-modernidad-no-es-una-tradicion-estancada.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2019. Un mundo Chíxe es posible. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., and A. Willis. 2019. “Seeing the Smart City on Twitter: Colour and the Affective Territories of Becoming Smart.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (3): 411–427. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818771080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segato, R. 2018. “Aníbal Quijano y la perspectiva de la colonialidad del poder.” La crítica de la colonialidad en ocho ensayos y una antropología por demanda, edited by R. Segato, 35–68. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestre, G., and G. Jajamovich. 2021. “The Role of Mobile Policies in Coalition Building: The Barcelona Model as Coalition Magnet in Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro (1989–1996).” Urban Studies 58 (11): 2310–2328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020939808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, G., and G. Jajamovich. forthcoming. “The Afterlives of Urban Megaprojects: Grounding Policy Models and Recirculating Knowledge Through Domestic Networks.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, O., T. Paasche, and F. Klauser. 2014. “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling.” City 18 (3): 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor Buck, N., and A. While. 2017. “Competitive Urbanism and the Limits to Smart City Innovation: The UK Future Cities Initiative.” Urban Studies 54 (2): 501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C. 2016. “Mobilizing Drug Policy Activism: Conferences, Convergence Spaces and Ephemeral Fixtures in Social Movement Mobilisation.” Space and Polity 20 (1): 124–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2015.1072913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. 2003. “Planning as Persuasive Storytelling in a Global-Scale web of Relationships.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 125–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022003.
   Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. 2016. Ciudades en beta: de las Smart cities a los smartcitizens. Santiago de Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Tironi, M., and T. Sánchez Criado. 2015. “Of Sensors and Sensitivities Towards a Cosmopolitics of ‘Smart Cities’?” Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies 6 (1): 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Valdez, A.-M., M. Cook, and S. Potter. 2018. “Roadmaps to Utopia: Tales of the Smart City.” Urban Studies 55 (15): 3385–3403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017747857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51 (5): 883–898. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, W., and E. M. Bruner. 1986. The Anthropology of Experience. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, A. 2015. “IBM’s Smart City as Techno-Utopian Policy Mobility.” City 19 (2–3): 258–273.
   Google Scholar