Benefits of public land usage: an analysis of outdoor recreationists

REFERENCES

• Booth, K. (2009). Applying the beneficial outcomes approach (BOA) to protected area management planning on Stewart Island/Rakiura New Zealand. Science for Conservation, 296, 1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D. (2012, June 27). Report: Outdoor rec critical to Colorado, nation. The Daily Sentinel
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A. T. (2005). Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056924
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Parks/Recreation Association. (1997). The benefits catalogue. Gloucester, ON: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Catell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. E., & Bates, D. L. (2011). Leisure motivation revisited: Why people recreate. Managing Leisure, 16, 253–268. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2011.613624
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L. (1998). The benefits are endless … but why? Parks & Recreation, 33(2), 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L. (Ed.). (2008). Managing to optimize the beneficial outcomes of recreation. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J., & Peterson, G. L. (1991). Benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L., & Bruns, D. (2008). Implementing OFM on public nature-based recreation and related amenity resources. In B. L. Driver (Ed.), Managing to optimize the beneficial outcomes of recreation (pp. 39–73). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2005). Designing a questionnaire. On Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.) [CD]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Godbey, G., Graefe, A., & James, S. W. (1992). The benefits of local recreation and park services: A nationwide study of the perceptions of the American public. Alexandria, VA: National Recreation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (Eds.). (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, W. W., Schneider, I. E., & Budruk, M. (2004). Extending importance-performance analysis with benefit-based segmentation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 22(1), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, S. V., Kowalski, C., Grybovich, O., Schuarte, G., & Neal, L. L. (2007). An examination of the benefits of leisure and recreation opportunities to residents of a remote and isolated community: A study of the Northwest Territories of Canada. Journal of Research in Health Physical Education Recreation Sport and Dance, 2(2), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., & Larson, R. A. (1993). Managing for wildlife viewing recreation experiences: An application in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21(3), 226–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, S. F., Clark, R. N., & Stankey, G. H. (2007). An assessment of frameworks useful for public land recreation planning. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/26955
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. L., & Driver, B. L. (2005). Introduction to outdoor recreation. Providing and managing natural resource based opportunities. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• More, T. A. & Kuentzel, W. F. (1999, April 11–14). Five reasons to have reservations about benefits based management. Proceedings of the 1999 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, The Sagamore on Lake George in Bolton Landing, New York. General technical report NE (p. 269).
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, C. O., & Hammitt, W. E. (2010). Determining economic benefits of park trails: Management implications. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(2), 94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Outdoor Industry Foundation. (2006). The active outdoor recreation economy. A $730 billion annual contribution to the U.S. economy. Retrieved from http://www.outdoorindustry.org/images/researchfiles/RecEconomypublic.pdf?26
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, W. E. (2002). Use of consumer panel survey data for public health communication planning: An evaluation of survey results. Paper session presented at the meeting of the American Statistical Association – Section on Health Policy Statistics, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, W. S., Jaakson, R., & Kim, E. I. (2001). Environmental auditing: Benefits-based analysis of visitor use of Sorak-San National Park in Korea. Environmental Management, 28(3), 413–419. doi: 10.1007/s0026702458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillen, J. R. (2008). Closing the public lands frontier: The Bureau of Land Management, 1961–1969. Journal of Policy History, 20(3), 419–445. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=77346b35-b016-4550-8e1b-bd60c96629d9%40sessionmgr4&vid=5&hid=105 doi: 10.1353/jph.0.0021
   Google Scholar
• Stein, T. V., Anderson, D. H., & Thompson, D. (1999). Identifying and managing for community benefits in Minnesota state parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 17(4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, T. V., & Lee, M. E. (1995). Managing recreation resources for positive outcomes: An application of benefits-based management. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 13(3), 52–70.
   Google Scholar
• Stodolska, M., Shinew, K. J., Acevedo, J. C., & Izenstark, D. (2011). Perceptions of urban parks as havens and contested terrains by Mexican-Americans in Chicago neighborhoods. Leisure Sciences, 33, 103–126. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2011.550220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Outdoor Foundation. (2011). Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2011. Retrieved from www.outdoorfoundation.org
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. J., Hull, R. B., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1998). On-site optimal experiences and their relationship to off-site benefits. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(4), 453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar