Perceptions of stakeholders regarding wilderness and best management practices in an Alaska recreation area

REFERENCES

• Allen, D. (1979). Wolves of Minong: Isle Royale’s wild community. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentrupperbäumer, J., Day, T., & Reser, J. (2006). Uses, meanings, and understandings of values in the environmental and protected area arena: A consideration of “world heritage” values. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 723–741. doi: 10.1080/08941920600801140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. (2006). Research methods in anthropology. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Bramwell, B., & Sharman, A. (1999). Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Society and Natural Resources, 26, 392–415.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, T. (2004). Tragedy averted: The promise of collaboration. Society and Natural Resources, 17, 881–896. doi: 10.1080/08941920490505284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S., Evans, A., & Fritz, S. (2002). Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Wilderness, 8(1), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Catton, W. (1969, December 19). Motivations of wilderness users. Pulp and Paper Magazine of Canada, pp. 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C., & Hendee, J. (2008). Wilderness management: Stewardship and protection of resources and values (4th ed.). Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, D., Fay, G., & Colt, S. (2007). Nature-based tourism in southeast Alaska: Results from 2005 and 2006 field study. Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage and Eco-Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., Seekamp, E., & Cole, D. (2010). Do recreation motivations and wilderness involvement relate to support for wilderness management? A segmentation analysis. Leisure Sciences, 32, 109–124. doi: 10.1080/01490400903547096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannigan, J. (1995). Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendee, J., & Dawson, C. (2002). Wilderness management: Stewardship and protection of resources and values (3rd ed.). Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
   Google Scholar
• Higham, J., Kearsley, G., & Kliskey, A. (2000). Wilderness perception scaling in New Zealand: An analysis of wilderness perceptions held by users, nonusers, and international visitors. In Proceedings from the Wilderness science in a time of change conference (RMRS-P-15-vol 2). Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, P., & Kahle, L. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 638–646. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janson, S. (2008). Applying the McDonaldization thesis and norm activation model to examine trends and effects of commercial outdoor recreation and tourism in Juneau, Alaska (Unpublished master's thesis). Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber, T., & Decker, D. (2011). Developing adaptability: The promise and pitfalls of collaborative conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 219–221. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2011.585437
   Google Scholar
• Lauber, T., Stedman, R., Decker, D., Knuth, B., & Simon, C. (2011). Social network dynamics in collaborative conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 259–272. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2011.542556
   Google Scholar
• Leedy, J., & Ormrod, P. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. (1941, July). Wilderness as a land laboratory. The Living Wilderness, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., & Richardson, R. (2001). Economic values of the U.S. wilderness system: Research evidence to date and questions for the future. International Journal of Wilderness, 7(1), 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• MacKaye, B. (1946). A wilderness philosophy. The Living Wilderness, 11, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M., Teel, T., & Bright, A. (2004). Applications of the concepts of values and attitudes in human dimensions of natural resource research. In M. Manfredo, J. Vaske, B. Bruyere, D. Field, & P. Brown (Eds.), Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge (pp. 271–282). Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, R. (1930). The problem of the wilderness. The Scientific Monthly, 30, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2001). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neary, J., & Griffin, P. (2008). Tracy arm-fords terror wilderness best management practices. Retrieved from http://www.fs.fed.us/r10/ro/sd_notes/spring_08/tracy-arm/tracy_arm.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Needham, M., & Rollins, R. (2009). Social science, conservation, and protected areas theory. In P. Dearden & R. Rollins (Eds.), Parks and protected areas in Canada: Planning and management (3rd ed., pp. 135–168). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., & Callicott, J. (2008). The wilderness debate rages on: Continuing the great new wilderness debate. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R. (2006). Sharing the management of a river corridor: A case study of the co-management process. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 709–721. doi: 10.1080/08941920600801132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, E., Needham, M., & Kruger, L. (2013a). Stakeholder perceptions of collaboration for managing nature-based recreation in a coastal protected area in Alaska. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 31(3), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, E., Needham, M., & Kruger, L. (2013b). Stakeholder perceptions of indicators of tourism use and codes of conduct in a coastal protected area in Alaska. Tourism in Marine Environments, 9, 95–115. doi: 10.3727/154427313X13659574650108
   Google Scholar
• Rolston, H., III. (1985). Valuing wildlands. Environmental Ethics, 7, 23–48. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics19857111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, C. (2009). Institutional dimensions of co-management: Participation, power, and process. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 230–244. doi: 10.1080/08941920802183354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, S., & Chavez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 19, 189–195. doi: 10.1007/BF02471990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, S., Schuett, M., & Carr, D. (2000). Modeling stakeholder perceptions of collaborative initiative effectiveness. Society and Natural Resources, 13, 735–745. doi: 10.1080/089419200750035593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, C., & Hammitt, W. (1995). Purism revisited: Specifying recreational conditions of concern according to resource intent. Leisure Sciences, 17, 15–30. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, E. (1999). Protected areas and aboriginal interests: At home in the Canadian Arctic wilderness. International Journal of Wilderness, 5(2), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, W., & Jaakson, R. (1997). Wilderness quality and visitors’ wilderness attitudes: Management implications. Environmental Management, 21, 225–232. doi: 10.1007/s002679900021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultis, J. (1999). The duality of wilderness: Comparing popular and political conceptions of wilderness in New Zealand. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 389–404. doi: 10.1080/089419299279498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurr, S. (1963). The value of wilderness to science. In F. Leydet & A. Adams (Eds.), Tomorrow's wilderness (pp. 59–75). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity. Ogden, UT: U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G., & Schreyer, R. (1987). Attitudes toward wilderness and factors affecting visitor behavior: A state-of-knowledge review. Ogden, UT: U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tourism Best Management Practices. (2009). Juneau, Alaska. Retrieved from: http://www.tbmp.info
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, W. (1982). Progress and privilege. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Forest Service. (2003). Tongass National Forest monitoring and evaluation report. Retrieved from http://steffenrasile.com/staging/tetratech/tongass/monitoring.php
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R., Loomis, J., & Gillman, R. (1984). Valuing option, existence and bequest demand for wilderness. Land Economics, 60, 14–29. doi: 10.2307/3146089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilderness Act. (1964). Pub. L. No. 88–577, 78 Stat. 890.
   Google Scholar
• Wilderness Best Management Practices for Tracy Arm-Fords Terror Wilderness. (2011). 2011 Tourism Best Management Practices (pp. 17–20). Retrieved from www.tbmp.info
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J., & Yaffee, S. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zegre, S., Needham, M., Kruger, L., & Rosenberger, R. (2012). McDonaldization and commercial outdoor recreation and tourism in Alaska. Managing Leisure, 17, 333–348. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2012.711604
   Google Scholar