3,929
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Innovation in Dementia Care

Do you observe what I perceive? The relationship between two perspectives on the ability of people with cognitive impairments to use everyday technology

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1295-1305 | Received 13 Nov 2018, Accepted 23 Mar 2019, Published online: 06 May 2019

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Bangen, K. J., Jak, A. J., Schiehser, D. M., Delano-Wood, L., Tuminello, E., Han, S. D., … Bondi, M. W. (2010). Complex activities of daily living vary by mild cognitive impairment subtype. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(04), 630–639. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891154/
  • Bates, D. W., & Bitton, A. (2010). The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Affairs, 29(4), 614–621.
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Coorey, G. M., Neubeck, L., Mulley, J., & Redfern, J. (2018). Effectiveness, acceptability and usefulness of mobile applications for cardiovascular disease self-management: Systematic review with meta-synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 25, 505–521.
  • Coughlin, J. F., Pope, J. E., & Leedle, B. R. (2006). Old age, new technology, and future innovations in disease management and home health care. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 18(3), 196–207.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536.
  • Engelhard, G. (1994). Examining rater errors in the assessment of written composition with a many‐faceted Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(2), 93–112.
  • Fallahpour, M., Kottorp, A., Nygård, L., & Lund, M. (2014). Perceived difficulty in use of everyday technology in persons with acquired brain injury of different severity: A comparison with controls. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(7), 635–641.
  • Fallahpour, M., Kottorp, A., Nygård, L., & Lund, M. L. (2015). Participation after acquired brain injury: Associations with everyday technology and activities in daily life. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(5), 366–376.
  • Fearing, V., Law, M., & Clark, J. (1997). An occupational performance process model: Fostering client and therapist alliances. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(1), 7–15.
  • Fernández, M. D. M., Hernández, J. D. S., Gutiérrez, J. M., Escuela, M. R. H., & Fino, E. R. (2017). Using communication and visualization technologies with senior citizens to facilitate cultural access and self-improvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 329–344.
  • Fisher, A. G. (2009). Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model: A model for planning and implementing top–down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Ft. Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.
  • Forsman, A. K., Nordmyr, J., Matosevic, T., Park, A.-L., Wahlbeck, K., & McDaid, D. (2017). Promoting mental wellbeing among older people: technology-based interventions. Health Promotion International, 33, 1042–1054. doi:
  • Garand, L., Lingler, J. H., Conner, K. O., & Dew, M. A. (2009). Diagnostic labels, stigma, and participation in research related to dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 2(2), 112–121.
  • Grubbs, F. E., & Beck, G. (1972). Extension of sample sizes and percentage points for significance tests of outlying observations. Technometrics, 14(4), 847–854.
  • Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Craig, K. D. (2002). A theoretical framework for understanding self-report and observational measures of pain: A communications model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(5), 551–570.
  • Hassan, E. (2005). Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. The Internet Journal of Epidemiology, 3(2), 339–412.
  • Hauk, N., Hüffmeier, J., & Krumm, S. (2018). Ready to be a silver surfer? A meta-analysis on the relationship between chronological age and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 304–319.
  • Hedman, A., Lindqvist, E., & Nygård, L. (2016). How older adults with mild cognitive impairment relate to technology as part of present and future everyday life: A qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 16, 73. doi:
  • Hedman, A., Nygård, L., Malinowsky, C., Almkvist, O., & Kottorp, A. (2016). Changing everyday activities and technology use in mild cognitive impairment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(2), 111–119.
  • Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J. W. (1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of American Statistical Association, 81(396), 991–999.
  • Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activity index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12(2), 166–170.
  • Kassberg, A.-C., Malinowsky, C., Jacobsson, L., & Lund, M. L. (2013). Ability to manage everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 27(13-14), 1583–1588.
  • Keningsberg, P.-A., Aquino, J.-P., Bérard, A., Brémond, F., Charras, K., Dening, T., … & Nguyen, M. (2017). Assistive technologies to address capabilities of people with dementia: From research to practice. doi:10.1177/1471301217714093
  • Khosravi, P., Rezvani, A., & Wiewiora, A. (2016). The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 594–603.
  • Kielhofer, G. (2008). Model of human occupation: Theory and application (4th ed.) Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Kottorp, A., & Nygård, L. (2011). Development of a short-form assessment for detection of subtle activity limitations: Can use of everyday technology distinguish between MCI and Alzheimer’s disease?. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11(5), 647–655.
  • Kottorp, A., Nygård, L., Hedman, A., ÖHman, A., Malinoswky, C., Rosenberg, L., … Ryd, C. (2016). Access to and use of everyday technology among older people: A occupational justice issue - but for whom?. Journal of Occupational Science, 23, 382–388.
  • Leicht, H., Berwig, M., & Gertz, H. J. (2010). Anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease: the role of impairment levels in assessment of insight across domains. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(03), 463–473.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2017a). FACETS: Many-Faceted Rasch Measurement Computer Program. Chicago: MESA Press.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2017b). Winsteps-Rasch Measurement Computer Program. Chicago: MESA Press.
  • Magaziner, J., Zimmerman, S. I., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Hebel, J. R., & Fox, K. M. (1997). Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status: comparison with self-reports and observations of performance. American Journal of Epidemiology, 146(5), 418–428.
  • Mak, E., Chin, R., Ng, L. T., Yeo, D., & Hameed, S. (2015). Clinical associations of anosognosia in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(12), 1207–1214.
  • Malinowsky, C. (2011). Managing Technology in Everyday Activities: A study of older adults with dementia, MCI and no cognitive impairment. Stockholm.
  • Malinowsky, C., Almkvist, O., Kottorp, A., & Nygård, L. (2011). Ability to manage everyday technology: A comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5, 462–469. doi:
  • Malinowsky, C., Almkvist, O., Nygård, L., & Kottorp, A. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of the ability to manage technology in everyday life. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 26–35. doi:
  • Malinowsky, C., Kottorp, A., Patomella, A.-H., Rosenberg, L., & Nygård, L. (2015). Changes in the technological landscape over time: Relevance and difficulty levels of everyday technologies as perceived by older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Technology and Disability, 27(3), 91–101.
  • Malinowsky, C., & Larsson-Lund, M. (2014). The association between perceived and observed abilities to use everyday technology in people of working age with ABI. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 465–472.
  • McDougall, S., & House, B. (2012). Brain training in older adults: Evidence of transfer to memory span performanceand pseudo-Matthew effects. Ageing, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 19(1-2), 195–221.
  • Nygård, L. (2006). How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia?. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13(2), 101–112.
  • Nygård, L. (2008). The meaning of everyday technology as experienced by people with dementia who live alone. Dementia, 7(4), 481–502.
  • Nygård, L., Kottorp, A., & Rosenberg, L. (2015). Making use of research: Clinical views on an evaluation of everyday technology use. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(1), 24–32.
  • Nygård, L., Rosenberg, L., & Kottorp, A. (2015). Manual Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire: ETUQ Everyday technology in activities at home and society. Stockholm.
  • Pfeffer, R. I., Kurosaki, T. T., Harrah, C. H. J., Chance, J. M., & Filos, S. (1982). Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. Journal of Gerontology, 37(3), 323–329.
  • Ready, R. E., Ott, B. R., & Grace, J. (2004). Patient versus informant perspectives of quality of life in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(3), 256–265.
  • Rosenberg, L., Nygård, L., & Kottorp, A. (2009). Everyday technology use questionnaire: psychometric evaluation of new assessment of competence in technology use. OTJR: Occuation. Participation, Health, 29(2), 52–62.
  • Ryd, C., Nygård, L., Malinowsky, C., Öhman, A., & Kottorp, A. (2015). Associations between performance of activities of daily living and everyday technology use among older adults with mild stage Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(1), 33–42.
  • Ryd, C., Nygård, L., Malinowsky, C., Öhman, A., & Kottorp, A. (2017). Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer's disease? - A pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(1), 201–209.
  • Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Parsey, C., & Cook, D. J. (2011). Cognitive correlates of functional performance in older adults: Comparison of self-report, direct observation, and performance-based measures. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(05), 853–864.
  • Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Parsey, C. M. (2014). Cognitive correlates of functional abilities in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: Comparison of questionnaire, direct observation, and performance-based measures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(5), 726–746.
  • Schulz, E., Wahl, H.-W., Matthews, J. T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S. R., & Czaja, S. J. (2015). Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(5), 724–734.
  • Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 1–32.
  • Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal design for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17(1), 101–110.
  • Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L.-O., … Petersen, R. C. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256(3), 240–246.
  • Ziefle, M., & Bay, S. (2005). How older adults meet complexity: Aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(5), 375–389.
  • Zwakhalen, S. M., Hamers, J. P., Abu-Saad, H. H., & Berger, M. P. (2006). Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: A systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools. BMC Geriatrics, 6(1), 3.