Factors predicting collaborative willingness of surrogates making medical decisions on the Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST)

References

• Arora, N. K., & McHorney, C. A. (2000). Patient preferences for medical decision making: Who really wants to participate? Medical Care, 38(3), 335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2017). Risk preferences in surrogate decision-making. Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. M., & Robbins, S. J. (2007). The role of framing effects in performance on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn, F., Goodman, C., Russell, B., Wilson, P., Manthorpe, J., Rait, G., … Durand, M. A. (2018). Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: A realist synthesis. Health Services and Delivery Research, 18(1), 165.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D., Blundell, N., Jones, M., Fraser, A., & Elwyn, G. (2010). Shared decision-making in cardiology: Do patients want it and do doctors provide it? Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugas, M. J., Freeston, M., & Ladouceur, R. (1997). Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(6), 593–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ende, J., Kazis, L., Ash, A., & Moskowitz, M. A. (1989). Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4(1), 23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, R., Hertwig, R., & Herzog, S. M. (2014). Surrogate decision making: Do we have to trade off accuracy and procedural satisfaction? Medical Decision Making, 34(2), 258–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999). Shared decision making in clinical medicine: Past research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 17(4), 285–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., Suzuki, N., & Watson, D. (2014). The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: Development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., & Watson, D. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K. H. (2002). Reviewing intuitive decision‐making and uncertainty: The implications for medical education. Medical Education, 36(3), 216–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, J., Pratt, C., & Nelson, C. (1992). Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152(5), 1049–1054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., Keevern, E., & Hammes, B. J. (2016). Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63(2), 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2016). Establishing an information avoidance scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(12), 1695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacklin, S., Maskrey, N., & Chapman, S. (2018). Improving shared decision making between patients and clinicians: Design and development of a virtual patient simulation tool. JMIR Medical Education, 4(2), e10088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams, N., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2014). Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 94(3), 291–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karel, M. J. (2000). The assessment of values in medical decision making. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(4), 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, K., & Maxwell, S. E. (2008). Sample size planning with applications to multiple regression: Power and accuracy for omnibus and targeted effects. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (166–193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kraetschmer, N., Sharpe, N., Urowitz, S., & Deber, R. B. (2004). How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision‐making? Health Expectations, 7(4), 317–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A., & Thisted, R. A. (2005). Not all patients want to participate in decision making: A national study of public preferences. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(6), 531–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majesko, A., Hong, S. Y., Weissfeld, L., & White, D. B. (2012). Identifying family members who may struggle in the role of surrogate decision maker. Critical Care Medicine, 40(8), 2281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy-Weir, L. J., Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Entwistle, V. A. (2015). Empirical relationships between health literacy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(3), 296–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy-Weir, L. J., Schwartz, L., Yost, J., & McKibbon, K. A. (2016). Empirical relationships between numeracy and treatment decision making: A scoping review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(3), 310–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., & Arkes, H. R. (2008). Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: Can surrogates accurately predict patients’ preferences? Medical Decision Making, 28(4), 524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National POLST Paradigm. (2018). Retrieved from http://polst.org/
   Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Health Psychology, 23(4), 388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlke, J., Strasser, S., & Vieider, F. M. (2015). Responsibility effects in decision-making under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(2), 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (2010). Public Law No. 111-148, Section 3506.
   Google Scholar
• Polman, E. (2012). Self–other decision-making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portanova, J., Irvine, K., Yi, J. Y., & Enguidanos, S. (2015). It isn't like this on TV: Revisiting CPR survival rates depicted on popular TV shows. Resuscitation, 96, 148–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, K. E., Wenger, N. S., & Kagawa‐Singer, M. (2000). End‐of‐life decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(9), 620–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandman, L., & Munthe, C. (2009). Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 30(4), 289–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C., & Härter, M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the autonomy‐preference‐index (API). Health Expectations, 13(3), 234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1573–1592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Redwood City: Mind Garden Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., & Trevena, L. (2017). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone, E. R., & Allgaier, L. (2008). A social values analysis of self–other differences in decision making involving risk. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 114–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. R., Liu, X., Corwin, D. S., Verceles, A. C., McCurdy, M. T., Pate, D. A., … Netzer, G. (2012). Learned helplessness among families and surrogate decision-makers of patients admitted to medical, surgical, and trauma ICUs. Chest, 142(6), 1440–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Multiple regression. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3, 709–811.
   Google Scholar
• Tejwani, V., Wu, Y., Serrano, S., Segura, L., Bannon, M., & Qian, Q. (2013). Issues surrounding end-of-life decision-making. Patient Preference and Adherence, 7, 771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census. (2017). United States census quick facts. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data.html
   Google Scholar
• Vig, E. K., Taylor, J. S., Starks, H., Hopley, E. K., & Fryer‐Edwards, K. (2006). Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end‐of‐life decision‐making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(11), 1688–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, K. N., Gabler, N. B., Cooney, E., Kent, S., Kim, J., Herbst, N., … Courtright, K. R. (2017). Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Affairs, 36(7), 1244–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, F. V., & Tunney, R. J. (2015). Who’s been framed? Framing effects are reduced in financial gambles made for others. BMC Psychology, 3(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar