Street-level Bureaucrats and Coping Mechanisms.The Unexpected Role of Italian Judges in Asylum Policy Implementation

References

• Ambrosini, M. (2021) ‘The urban governance of asylum as a “battleground”: policies of exclusion and efforts of inclusion in Italian towns’, Geographical Review, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirens, H. (2018) Cracked Foundation, Uncertain Future: Structural Weaknesses in the Common European Asylum System, Migration Policy Institute Europe, pp. 2–33.  Available online at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/CEAS-StructuralWeaknesses_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biland, E. & Steinmetz, H. (2017) ‘Are judges street-level bureaucrats? Evidence from French and Canadian family courts’, Law and Social Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 298–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2011) ‘Putting street-level organizations first: new directions for social policy and management research’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 21, no. suppl. 2, pp. 199–201.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2012) ‘Reflections on street‐level bureaucracy: past, present, and future’, Public Administration Review, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 940–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T. & Jones-Correa, M. (2018) ‘Theorising migration policy in multilevel states: the multilevel governance perspective’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1995–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli Gattinara, P. (2017) ‘The ‘refugee crisis’ in Italy as a crisis of legitimacy’, Contemporary Italian Politics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 318–331.
   Google Scholar
• Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura. (2018) ‘Monitoraggio sezioni specializzate in materia di immigrazione. modalità organizzative’, Available online at: https://www.csm.it/documents/21768/121438/Protezione+internazionale+-+Organizazzione+degli+uffici+e+Monitoraggio/50ea1e3a-23d4-6684-4915-df4e5283c63a
   Google Scholar
• Contini, F. & Lanzara, G. F. (2009) ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector. European Perspectives in the Making of E-government, Palgrave, London.
   Google Scholar
• Contini, M. C. (2018) ‘La riforma Orlando-Minniti a un anno dall’entrata in vigore. I molti dubbi e le poche certezze nella prassi delle sezioni specializzate’, Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza, vol. 3, pp. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlvik, J. (2018) Inside Asylum Bureaucracy: Organizing Refugee Status Determination in Austria, Springer Nature, London.
   Google Scholar
• Dallara, C. (2015) ‘Powerful resistance against a long-running personal crusade: the impact of Silvio Berlusconi on the Italian judicial system’, Modern Italy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallara, C. & Piana, D. (2015) Networking the Rule of Law: How Change Agents Reshape Judicial Governance in the EU, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C. (1969) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2008) ‘Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research’, in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, eds D. della Porta & M. Keating, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 198–222.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. M. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016) ‘Towards a reform of the common European asylum system and enhancing legal avenues to Europe’, Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160406/towards_a_reform_of_the_common_european_asylum_system_and_enhancing_legal_avenues_to_europe_-_20160406_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020) ‘Asylum statistics’, Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Asylum_statistics
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2010) ‘Professionals, managers and discretion: critiquing street-level bureaucracy’, The British Journal of Social Work, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 368–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. & Harris, J. (2004) ‘Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion’, The British Journal of Social Work, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 871–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, I. (2019) ‘The implementation of Italian asylum policy and the recognition of protection in times of crisis: between external and internal constraints’, Contemporary Italian Politics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 429–445.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, R. & Good, A. (2014) ‘Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France’, Language and Intercultural Communication, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N. & Good, A. (2019) Asylum Determination in Europe: Ethnographic Perspectives, Springer Nature, London.
   Google Scholar
• Giovannetti, M. (2021) ‘I perimetri incerti della tutela: la protezione internazionale nei procedimenti amministrativi e giudiziari’, Questione Giustizia, pp. 1–17. Available online at: https://www.questionegiustizia.it/articolo/i-perimetri-incerti-della-tutela-la-protezione-internazionale-nei-procedimenti-amministrativi-e-giudiziari
   Google Scholar
• Good, A. (2006) Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Courts, Routledge-Cavendish, Oxon.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, S., Burns, N., Hutton, N., McNeill, F. & Tata, C. (2009) ‘Street-level bureaucracy, interprofessional relations, and coping mechanisms: a study of criminal justice social workers in the sentencing process’, Law & Policies, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 405–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C. & Hill, M. (1984) The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Hambly, J. & Gill, N. (2020) ‘Law and speed: asylum appeals and the techniques and consequences of legal quickening’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. (1992) ‘The use of legal discretion: perspectives from law and social science’, in The Uses of Discretion, ed. K. Hawkins, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 11–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, R. (2013) ‘The judicialization of politics’, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, ed. R. Goodin, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Available online at: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199604456-e-013
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. (2013) ‘Dimensions of discretion: specifying the object of street-level bureaucracy research’, dms–der moderne staat–Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesson, L. (2018) ‘Exploring the “liberal paradox” from the inside: evidence from the Swedish migration courts’, International Migration Review, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1162–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowell, J. (1973) ‘The legal control of administrative discretion’, Public Law, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 178–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, M. (2015) ‘Believable victims. Asylum credibility and the struggle for objectivity’, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O. & Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Miaz, J. (2017) ‘From the law to the decision: the social and legal conditions of asylum adjudication in Switzerland’, European Policy Analysis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 372–396.
   Google Scholar
• Ministero degli Interni. (2020) ‘Quaderno statistico per gli anni 1990-2020ʹ, Available online at: http://www.libertaciviliimmigrazione.dlci.interno.gov.it/sites/default/files/allegati/quaderno_statistico_per_gli_anni_1990_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs.
   Google Scholar
• Moraru, M., Cornelisse, G. & De Bruycker, P. (2020) Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• RE-JUS PROJECT. (2018) ‘Effective justice in asylum and immigration’, Available online at: https://www.rejus.eu/sites/default/files/content/materials/rejus_casebook_effective_justice_in_asylum_and_immigration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, C., Crepeau, F., Foxen, P. & Houle, F. (2002) ‘The complexity of determining refugeehood: a multidisciplinary analysis of the decision-making process of the Canadian immigration and refugee board’, Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. (2020) ‘Ambiguous goals, uneven implementation–how immigration offices shape internal immigration control in Germany’, Comparative Migration Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sorgoni, B. (2019) ‘What do we talk about when we talk about credibility? Refugee appeals in Italy’, in Asylum Determination in Europe: Ethnographic Perspectives, eds N. Gill & A. Good, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Tata, C. (2007) ‘Sentencing as craftwork and the binary epistemologies of the discretionary decision process’, Social & Legal Studies, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E. & Sager, F. (2018) Innovative Approaches to EU Multilevel Implementation: Moving beyond Legal Compliance, Routledge, Oxfordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E. & Musheno, M. (2015) ‘Coping during public service delivery: a conceptualization and systematic review of the literature’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1099–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urso, O. (2018) ‘The politicization of immigration in Italy. Who frames the issue, when and how’, Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Parys, L. (2019) ‘Specifying the dependent variable in street-level bureaucracy research’, in Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy, ed. P. Hupe, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Verzelloni, L. (2020) Paradossi dell’innovazione: I sistemi giustizia del Sud Europa, Carrocci Editore, Roma.
   Google Scholar