1,745
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Subject of Mentoring: Towards a Knowledge and Practice Base for Content-focused Mentoring of New Teachers

&

References

  • Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (2005). Focusing new teachers on diversity and equity: Toward a knowledge base for mentors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 843–862.
  • Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (2006). Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (2010). New teacher induction and mentoring for educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 573–594). London: Springer.
  • Athanases, S. Z., & Achinstein, B. (2003). Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor’s repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 1486–1520.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. C. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Ronfeldt, M., & Wyckoff, J. (2012). Recruiting effective math teachers: Evidence from New York city. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1008–1047.
  • Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Evans, T. W. (2000). The new mentors. Teachers College Record, 102, 244–263.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 255–273.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 32–43.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., & Yusko, B. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction (A work product of the National Partnership on Excellence and Accountability in Education Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548–616). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.
  • Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
  • Luft, J. (2009). Beginning secondary science teachers in different induction programmes: The first year of teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2355–2384.
  • Luft, J., & Patterson, N. C. (2002). Bridging the gap: Supporting beginning science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 287–313.
  • Luft, J., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 77–97.
  • Luft, J., Neakrase, J., Adams, K., Firestone, J., & Bang, E. (2010). Bringing content into induction programs: Examples from science. In J. Wang, S. Odell, & R. Clift (Eds.), Past, present, and future research on teacher induction (pp. 205–220). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Quantitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Porter, A., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259–297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Rockoff, J. E. (2008). Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Shields, P. M., Esch, C. E., Humphrey, D. C., Riehl, L. M., Tiffany-Morales, J. D., & Young, V. M. (2000). The status of the teaching profession 2000 (Report to the teaching and California’s future task force). Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484–504). New York, NY: Longman.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Strong, M., & Baron, W. (2004). An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginning teachers: Suggestions and responses. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 47–57.
  • Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143–178.
  • Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72, 481–546.
  • Wang, J., Strong, M., & Odell, S. J. (2004). Mentor-novice conversations about teaching: A comparison of two US and two Chinese cases. Teachers College Record, 106, 775–813.
  • Wechsler, M. E., Caspary, K., Humphrey, D. C., & Matsko, K. K. (2010). Examining the effects of new teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
  • Williams, W. M., Papierno, P. B., Makel, M. C., & Ceci, S. J. (2004). Thinking like a scientist about real-world problems: The Cornell Institute for Research on Children Science Education Program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 107–126.
  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.