Models of influence on mathematics instructional coaches

References

• Anderson, G. L., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. S. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J. (2002). Five keys to unlocking continuous improvement. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(2), 89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., & Porter, A. C. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57, 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Fogelberg, E., & Obrochta, C. (2005). Literacy coaching for change. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 55–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, G., Castagna, C., Moir, E., & Warren, B. (2005). Blended coaching: Skills and strategies to support principal development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., Reumann-Moore, R., Huge, R., Christman, J. B., Riffer, M., du Plessis, P., & Maluk, H. P. (2007). Making a difference: Year two report of the Pennsylvania high school coaching initiative. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.
   Google Scholar
• Buly, M. R., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Egawa, K. (2006). Literacy coaching: Coming out of the corner. Voices from the Middle, 13(4), 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Byrk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., Kimball, S. M., & Lowenhaupt, R. (2008). Going to scale with teacher leadership: Lessons learned from a district wide literacy coach initiative. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 120–143). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide (critical social thought). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, B. A., Bahr, H. M., & Albrecht, S. L. (1984). Social sciences research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Coggins, C. T., Stoddard, P., & Cutler, E. (2003, April). Improving instructional capacity through school-based reform coaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feiler, R., Heritage, M., & Gallimore, R. (2000). Teachers leading teachers. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 66–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Prokos, A. H. (2007). The interview: From formal to postmodern. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T. (2004). Peer mentoring in the development of beginning secondary science teachers: Three case studies. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 12(2), 219–239.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. P., & Brobeck, S. R. (2010). Coaching the mentor: Facilitating reflection and change. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 18(4), 219–239.
   Google Scholar
• Ingalls, J. D. (1984). A trainer’s guide to andragogy. Washington, DC: Peace Corps.
   Google Scholar
• Irby, B. J. (2012). Editor’s overview: Mentoring, tutoring, and coaching. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(3), 297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K. (2007). 5 key points to building a coaching program. Journal of Staff Development, 28(1), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K. (2009a). Coaching: The key to translating research into practice lies in continuous, job-embedded learning with ongoing support. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K. (2009b). Instructional coaching. In J. K. Knight (Ed.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives (pp. 29–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. New York, NY: Adult Education Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, 30, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. R., McCombs, J. S., & Marsh, J. (2010). Linking reading coaches and student achievement: Evidence from Florida middle schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 372–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mangin, M. M. (2008). The influence of organizational design on instructional teacher leadership. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 77–98). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2008). Teacher leadership: What it is and why it matters. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGatha, M. (2008). Levels of engagement in establishing coaching relationships. Teacher Development, 12(2), 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. C. (2007). Differentiated literacy coaching: Scaffolding for student and teacher success. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Mathematics specialists and mathematics coaches: What does the research say? Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/news/content.aspx?id=22839
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity. Philadelphia, PA: Education Matters Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Obara, S. (2010). Mathematics coaching: A new kind of professional development. Teacher Development, 14(2), 241–251.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, T. B. (2009). A case study: The influence of the Pennsylvania High School Coaching Initiative on the change of teachers’ instructional practices and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro Quest. (Order No. 100142477).
   Google Scholar
• Race, K. E. H., Ho, E., & Bower, L. (2002, April). Documenting in-classroom support and coaching activities of a professional development program directed toward school change: An integral part of an organization’s evaluation efforts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED465761.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, R., & Carrington, S. (2002). Professional development for inclusive schooling. International of Educational Management, 16(5), 239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Showers, B. (1982). Transfer of training: The contribution of coaching. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED231035.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Showers, B. (1984). Peer coaching: A strategy for facilitating transfer of training. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Sprick, R., Knight, J., Reinke, W., & McKale, T. (2006). Coaching classroom management: Strategies and tools for administrators and coaches. Eugene, OR: Pacific Northwest Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basis of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. E. (2008). Instructional coaching: The state of the art. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10–35). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teemant, A. (2014). A mixed method investigation of instructional coaching for teachers of diverse learners. Urban Education, 49(5), 574–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terehoff, I. I. (2002). Elements of adult learning in teacher professional development. NASSP Bulletin, 86(632), 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York, NY: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Toll, C. A. (2005). The literacy coach’s survival guide: Essential questions and practical answers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 71, 547–593.
   Google Scholar
• Tung, R., Ouimette, M., & Feldman, J. (2004). The challenge of coaching: Providing cohesion among multiple reform agendas. Boston, MA: Center for Collaborative Education.
   Google Scholar
• West, L., & Staub, F. C. (2003). Content-focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar