Cognitive mentorship: Protégé behavior as a mediator to performance

References

• Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. J., Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (2002). Formal mentoring systems: An examination of the effects of mentor/protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1111–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173—1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, S. E. (1991). Designing effective learning environments: Cognitive apprenticeship models. ERIC Document 337 689, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Education Researcher, 18, 1. 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234–246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, P., Miller, R., & Monroe, E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship as an instructional strategy for solving corporate training challenges. TechTrends, 53(6), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P. (2004). Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2, 813–828.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Air Force. (2000). Air force mentoring. Air force instruction 363401. Washington: HQ USAF.
   Google Scholar
• Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T. W. H., & DuBois, D. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 254–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, L. T., & Lockwood, A. (2005). Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2000). Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Cole, G., & Senker, P. (1998). Development of knowledge and skills in employment. Research Report 5, University of Sussex Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. Petty & J. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gheesling, R. H. (2010). A study of formal and informal mentoring in the United States Air Force(Master’s thesis). Air Force Institute of Technology, department of Systems and Engineering Management,  Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA522435
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. (1998). An evaluation of characteristics and practices associated with effective mentoring within the United States Air Force(Master’s thesis). Air Force Institute of Technology, department of Systems and Engineering Management,  Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA354212
   Google Scholar
• Godshalk, V. M., & Sosik, J. J. (2000). Does mentor-protégé agreement on mentor leadership behavior influence the quality of a mentoring relationship? Group & Organization Management, 25(3), 291–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. P., & Brobeck, S. R. (2010). Coaching the mentor: Facilitating reflection and change. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18:4, 427–447.
   Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1986). A theory of dyadic career reality. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 4, 147–181.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Le Blanc, P. M., & González-Romá, V. (2012). A team level investigation of the relationship between leader–Member exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 534–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, F. (1985). Air Force mentoring: The mentor’s perspective(Master’s thesis). Air Force Institute of Technology, department of Systems and Engineering Management, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA161441
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, M. (2012). Leadership of learning and reflective practice: An exploratory study of nursing managers. Management Learning, 43, 609–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg, D. J. (2008). Mentoring for protégé character development. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16:1, 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A., Greenberger, D. B., & Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go from here. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 21, 129–173.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L., Hemlin, S., & Pousette, A. (2012). A multi-level analysis of leader–Member exchange and creative performance in research groups. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 604–619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36: 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1177–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratio, C., & Hall, D. (1999). Mentoring urban youth in the post-industrial city: Some guiding principles based on developed notions of situated learning and a cognitive mentoring model of initial teacher education. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 6:3, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of youth mentoring relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, D. J., Smith, T. A., Watt, J. D., Casper, W. J., & Greguras, G. J. (2015). It’s all in the attitude: The role of job attitude strength in job attitude-outcome relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1259–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, D. J., Watt, J. D., & Greguras, G. J. (2004). Reexamining the job satisfaction-performance relationship: The complexity of attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, K. E., Kennedy, D. M., Woodard, M. S., & McComb, S. A. (2012). Examining the “exchange” in leader–Member exchange. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R. (2007). Negotiating power and pedagogy in student teaching: Expanding and shifting roles in expert-novice discourse. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15:1, 87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shields, M., & Abrams, L. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J., & Marchese, M. (2006). Mentor and protégé predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model, In M. Ronald Buckley, Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, Anthony R. Wheeler (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, 22, 39–124 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, L. (2004). Mentoring and coaching in the workplace: An insight into two leading leadership development programs in organizations. Canadian Manager, 29(3), 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zey, M. G. (1984). The mentor connection. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
   Google Scholar