267
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Autoethnography of tutoring in the Russian university: from theoretical knowledge to practical implementation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
  • Argente-Linares, E., Pérez-Lopez, M. C., & Ordonez-Solana, C. (2016). Practical experience of blended mentoring in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(5), 399–414.
  • Bakx, A., Bakker, A., Koopman, M., & Beijaard, D. (2016). Boundary crossing by science teacher researchers in a PhD program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 76–87.
  • Bannink, F. P. (2007). Solution-focused brief therapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(2), 87–94.
  • Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432–445.
  • Beausaert, S. A. J., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2011). Using a personal development plan for different purposes: Its influence on undertaking learning activities and job performance. Vocations and Learning, 4(3), 231–252.
  • Benson, P. (2011). Language learning careers as an object of narrative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 545–553.
  • Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: Continuity and change in young people’s dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 583–597.
  • Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66(2), 129–147.
  • Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Runde, A. (2005). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated expert-layperson communication: An overview and insights into the field of medical advice. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in supporting written knowledge communication 23 computer-mediated knowledge communication—And how they may be overcome (pp. 89–119). New York: Springer.
  • Bunting, B., & Williams, D. (2017). Stories of transformation: Using personal narrative to explore transformative experience among undergraduate peer mentors. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 166–184.
  • Carnell, E. (2007). Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: Extending the boundaries. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 25–40.
  • Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68–75.
  • Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek, Calif.: Left Coast Press.
  • Chen, C.-H., Liao, C.-H., Chen, Y.-C., & Lee, C.-F. (2011). The integration of synchronous communication technology into service learning for pre-service teachers’ online tutoring of middle school students. Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 27–33.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories-stories of teachers-school stories-stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.
  • Clegg, S., & Bufton, S. (2008). Student support through personal development planning: Retrospection and time. Research Papers in Education, 23(4), 435–450.
  • Coles, R., & Thomson, P. (2016). Beyond records and representations: Inbetween writing in educational ethnography. Ethnography and Education, 11(3), 253–266.
  • Della Noce, D. J. (2009). Evaluative mediation: In search of practice competencies. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27(2), 193–214.
  • Derry, S. J., & Fischer, G. (2005). Toward a model and theory for transdisciplinary graduate education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Available at: http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/aera-montreal.pdf.
  • Dockter, J. (2016). The problem of teaching presence in transactional theories of distance education. Computers and Composition, 40, 73–86.
  • Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Erstad, O., Gilje, O., Sefton-Green, J., & Vasbo, K. (2009). Exploring “learning lives”: Community, identity, literacy and meaning. Literacy, 43(2), 100–106.
  • Ferguson, M., & Ibbetson, A. (2005). The use of online technologies in the teaching and learning process: WebCT-communication or technology turn-off? International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 1(4), 25–38.
  • Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 20–23.
  • Hannon, J., & Bretag, T. (2010). Negotiating contested discourses of learning technologies in higher education. Educational Technology and Society, 13(1), 106–120.
  • Hardy, S. (2008). Mediation and genre. Negotiation Journal, 24(3), 247–268.
  • Ibarra, H., & Petriglieri, J. L. (2010). Identity work and play. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(1), 10–25.
  • Jelfs, A., Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2009). Student and tutor perceptions of effective tutoring in distance education. Distance Education, 30(3), 419–441.
  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275.
  • Koroleva, Y. A. (2017). Tutor support of socialization of students with disabilities in inclusive education. Concept (Kontsept), 35, 75–78 (in Russ).
  • Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202–222.
  • Kydd, A. (2003). Which side are you on? bias, credibility, and mediation. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 597–611.
  • Lane, H. B., Hudson, R. F., McCray, E. D., Tragash, J. R., & Zeig, J. L. (2011). Tutoring opened my eyes: Tutor experiences in the america reads challenge. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(2), 199–218.
  • Lee, T. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Kashima, Y. (2014). The serial reproduction of conflict.third parties escalate conflict through communication biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 68–72.
  • Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., & Saljö, R. (2010). Introduction: Learning across sites; new tools, infrastructures and practices. In S. R. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Saljo (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Malin, J. R., & Hackmann, D. G. (2016). Mentoring as socialization for the educational leadership professoriate: A collaborative autoethnography. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 158–178.
  • McCloskey, E., & Cann, C. N. (2013). What a difference a label makes: Positioning and response in an afterschool tutoring program. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(4), 338–355.
  • McCroskey, J. C., Valencic, K. M., & Richmond, V. P. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197–210.
  • Ngunjiri, F. W., Hernandez, K.-A. C., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), 1–17. Retrieved from: http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/241/186
  • Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ritter, G. W., Barnett, J. H., Denny, G. S., & Albin, G. R. (2009). The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs for elementary and middle school students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 3–38.
  • Safarzyńska, K. (2013). Socio-economic determinants of demand for private tutoring. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 139–154.
  • Sangra, A., & Gonzalez-Sanmamed, M. (2010). The role of information and communication technologies in improving teaching and learning processes in primary and secondary schools. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(3), 207–220.
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
  • Terry, T., & Ghosh, R. (2015). Mentoring from different social spheres: How can multiple mentors help in doctoral student success in ed.D programs? Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(3), 187–212.
  • Thomas, L., & Hixenbaugh, P. (Eds.). (2006). Personal tutoring in higher education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
  • Trahar, S. (2013). Autoethnographic journeys in learning and teaching in higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 367–375.
  • Vander Kloet, M., & Aspenlieder, E. (2013). Educational development for responsible graduate students in the neoliberal university. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 286–298.
  • Wall, J. A., & Chan-Serafin, S. (2014). Friendly persuasion in civil case mediations. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31(3), 285–303.
  • Wheeler, S., & Birtle, J. (1993). A handbook for personal tutors. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Wyre, D. C., Gaudet, C. H., & McNeese, M. N. (2016). So you want to be a mentor? An analysis of mentor competencies. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(1), 73–88.
  • Young, I. M. (1997). Asymmetrical reciprocity: on moral respect, wonder, and enlarged thought. Constellations, 3(3), 340–363.
  • Zachary, L. J. (2011). The mentor’s guide: Facilitating effective learning relationships. John San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.