The impact of program design and coaching support on novice teachers’ induction experience

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). IBM SPSS AMOS 22 Users’ Guide: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, K. C., & Marks, J. T. (2017). Connecting teacher preparation to teacher induction. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 360–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2015). Exploring mechanisms of effective teacher coaching: A tale of two cohorts from a randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 542–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., & Velez, C. N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(2), 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornett, J., & Knight, J. (2009). Research on coaching. In Knight (Ed.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives (pp. 192–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Higdon, K. (2008). The effects of mentoring/induction support on beginning teachers’ practices in early elementary classrooms (K-3). Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(3), 261–274.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teacher’s professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263.
   Google Scholar
• Ehsanipour, T., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2017). Exploring coaching for powerful technology use in education. Center to Support Excellence in Teaching– Stanford University. Digital Promise. Retrieved on 1 September, 2017 from: http://digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Dynamic-Learning-Project-Paper-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S., Strong, M., & Villar, A. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110(10), 2271–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. (2017). Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., Isenberg, E., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Grider, M., & Jacobus, M. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, L. (2016). Support from the start: A 50-state review of policies on new educator induction and mentoring. New Teacher Center. Retrieved on 1 September, 2017 from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/daa2/d6d3b8e41d60d9cf9752ba7e8bcb577dbb5a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guarino, C. M., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headden, S. (2014). Beginners in the classroom: What the changing demographics of teaching mean for schools, students, and society. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556480.pdf Retrieved on 1 September, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D. C., Wechsler, M. E., & Hough, H. J. (2008). Characteristics of effective alternative teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction what the data tell us. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2012). Characteristics of teacher induction programs and turnover rates of beginning teachers. The Teacher Educator, 47(4), 268–282.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J., & Cornett, J. (2009). Studying the impact of instructional coaching. University of Kansas Center of Research on Teaching. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Blazar, D. (2016). Individualized coaching to improve teacher practice across grades and subjects: New experimental evidence. Educational Policy, 31(7), 1033–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, A. (2017). Relationships between instructional quality and classroom management for beginning urban teachers. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 355–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, A. (2018). Promoting “quality” feedback: First-year teachers’ self-reports on their development as classroom managers. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 53(1), 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, A., & Cain, C. (2021). Alternatively certified teachers’ perceptions of new teacher induction. Professional Development in Education, 1–13. doi:10.1080/19415257.2021.1879226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, A., Keese, J., Suárez, M. I., Mitchell, D., & Huston, D. (2021). Novice teacher vertical professional development? Exploring teachers’ and coaches’ beliefs throughout a two-year induction program. Learning Environments Research, 0123456789. doi:10.1007/s10984-021-09360-3
   Google Scholar
• LoCascio, S. J., Smeaton, P. S., & Waters, F. H. (2016). How induction programs affect the decision of alternate route urban teachers to remain teaching. Education and Urban Society, 48(2), 103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. E., Kwok, A., & Huston, D. (2020). Induction program structures as mediating factors for coach influence on novice teacher development. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 812–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., & Hochberg, E. D. (2015). Mentor policy and the quality of mentoring. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 76–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M., & McQueen, K. (2017). Does new teacher induction really improve retention? Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 394–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In Irving B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology, 607–634. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202023
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, M. E., Caspary, K., Humphrey, D. C., & Matsko, K. K. (2010). Examining the effects of new teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
   Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S. L., & Rigby, J. G. (2017). Coaching for coherence: How instructional coaches lead change in the evaluation era. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar