Equal peer e-mentoring for online graduate students: a case study and mediation model

References

• Aday, L. A., & Cornelius, L. J. (2006). Designing and conducting health surveys: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos 23.0 user’s guide. Chicago: IBM SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Cachia, M., Lynam, S., & Stock, R. (2018). Academic success: Is it just about the grades? Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 434–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius, V., Wood, L., & Lai, J. (2016). Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Janasz, S. C., & Godshalk, V. M. (2013). The role of e-mentoring in protégés’ learning and satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 743–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiRenzo, M. S., Linnehan, F., Shao, P., & Rosenberg, W. L. (2010). A moderated mediation model of e-mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle N, Jacobs K and Ryan C. (2016). Faculty Mentors' Perspectives on E-Mentoring Post-Professional Occupational Therapy Doctoral Students. Occup. Ther. Int., 23(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, N. W., Gafni Lachter, L., & Jacobs, K. (2019). Scoping review of mentoring research in the occupational therapy literature, 2002–2018. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(5), 541–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, N., Jacobs, K., & Ryan, C. (2016). Faculty mentors’ perspectives on e‐mentoring post‐professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy International, 23(4), 305–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, L. T. D. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., … Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 637–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. A., Eury, J. L., & Gaffney, M. E. (2015). Digging deeper: Exploring the relationship between mentoring, developmental interactions, and student agency. New Directions for Higher Education, 2015(171), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N. (2013). Culture and online distance learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 185–200). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., and Jacoby, J. (2019). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., Doyle, N., & Ryan, C. (2015). The nature, perception, and impact of E-mentoring on post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy In Health Care, 29(2), 201–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Tam, C., Fay, L., Pilkington, M., Servais, M., & Petrosian, H. (2011). Evaluation of an occupational therapy mentorship program: Effects on therapists’ skills and family-centered behavior. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31(3), 245–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online mentoring of dissertations: The role of structure and support. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, K., Geesa, R., & McConnell, K. (2018). Designing a peer-mentoring program for education doctorate (EdD) students: A literature review. Higher Learning Research Communications, 8(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v8i1.408
   Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), 457–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orazbayeva, B., Davey, T., Plewa, C., & Galán-Muros, V. (2019). Engagement of academics in education-driven university-business cooperation: A motivation-based perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Assessing mediation in communication research. In The sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452272054
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J. P., Ogenchuk, M. J., & Nsiah, J. K. (2014). Peer mentorship and transformational learning: PhD student experiences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, C. H., May, S., Edirisingha, P., Burke, L., & Linsey, T. (2009). From face-to-face to e-mentoring: Does the” e” add any value for mentors? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 116–124.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, S., & Carpenter, C. (2009). Electronic mentoring: An innovative approach to providing clinical support. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(4), 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. L., & Kim, J. (2011). E-mentoring in online course projects: Description of an e-mentoring scheme. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 9(2), 80–95.
   Google Scholar