352
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Getting them done: a qualitative study of characteristics of mentors successful in graduating online students in a distance education context

&
Pages 489-511 | Received 01 Jun 2023, Accepted 01 Jun 2023, Published online: 27 Jun 2023

References

  • Anastasia, C. M., & Burrington, D. D. (2021). Scholar to practitioner: A new paradigm for research chairs. In R. Throne (Ed.), Practice-based and practice-led research for dissertation development (pp. 108–136). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Black, R. (2017). E-mentoring the online doctoral student from the dissertation prospectus through dissertation completion. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–8.
  • Brewer, P. R., & Stein, D. S. (2022). The roots of change: Adult higher Education and online for-profit institutions. In D. Stein, H. Glazer, & C. Wainwright (Eds.), Driving innovation with for-profit adult higher education online institutions (pp. 1–19). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Burkholder, G. J. (2022). Mentoring doctoral students in a distance learning environment. In D. Stein, H. Glazer, & C. Wainwright (Eds.), Driving innovation with for-profit adult higher education online institutions (pp. 142–172). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., Crawford, L. M., & Hitchcock, J. H. (2020). Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Burkholder, G. J., Lenio, J., Holland, N., Seidman, A., Neal, D., Middlebrook, J., & Jobe, R. (2013). An institutional approach to developing a culture of student persistence. Higher Learning Research Communications, 3(3), 16–39. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v3i3.120
  • Burrington, D., Madison, R. D., Schmitt, A., & Howell, D. (2022). Student perspectives on dissertation chairs’ mentoring practices in an online practitioner doctoral program. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 25(4), 1–19.
  • Çakıroğlu, Ü., Kokoç, M., Gökoğlu, S., Zturk, M., & Erdoğdu, F. (2019). An analysis of the journey of open and distance education: Major concepts and cutoff points in research trends. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 20(1), 1–20. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3743
  • Cameron, K. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Council of Graduate Schools. (2008). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline program data from the Ph.D. completion project. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Covelli, B. J., & Roy, S. (2022). Emergency remote teaching versus planned remote teaching: Narrowing the gap with targeted professional development. Higher Learning Research Communications, 12(2), 74–91. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v12i2.1340
  • Crawford, L. M., Randolph, J. J., & Yob, I. M. (2014). Theoretical development, factorial validity, and reliability of the online graduate mentoring scale. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 20–37. doi:10.1080/13611267.2014.882603
  • Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2
  • Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2017). Doctoral students’ experiences leading to completion or attrition: A matter of sense, progress, and distress. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 32(1), 61–77. doi:10.1007/s10212-016-0290-0
  • Elmore, R. L. (2021). Reflections on mentoring online doctoral learners through the dissertation. Christian Higher Education, 20(1–2), 57–68. doi:10.1080/15363759.2020.1852132
  • Falkenheim, J. C. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. National Science Board. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/
  • Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Geesa, R. L., Brown, R. D., & McConnell, K. R. (2020). Mentoring pathways program for first year education doctor of education students: Perspectives of a program redesigned for sustainability. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(2), 156–175. doi:10.1080/13611267.2020.1749346
  • Gray, M. A., & Crosta, L. (2019). New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: A systematic literature review. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(2), 173–190. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405
  • Gredler, J. J., & Harland, D. (2022). Online faculty’s use of technology when advising doctoral capstone writers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 36–49. doi:10.14742/ajet.6994
  • Hall, W. A., & Liva, S. (2021). Mentoring as a transformative experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(1), 6–22. doi:10.1080/13611267.2021.1899583
  • Holley, K. A., & Caldwell, M. L. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoral student mentoring program. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 253–253. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y
  • Holloway, E. L., & Alexandre, L. (2012). Crossing boundaries in doctoral education: Relational learning, cohort communities, and dissertation Committees. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 131(131), 85–97. doi:10.1002/tl.20029
  • Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532. doi:10.3102/00346543061004505
  • Jr, B. D., Uribe-Flórez, L. J., Trespalacios, J., & Chilson, J. (2019). Doctoral e-mentoring: Current practices and effective strategies. Online Learning, 23(1), 236–248. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1446
  • Kahlke, R. M. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 37–52. doi:10.1177/160940691401300119
  • Kehm, B. M. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America: A comparative analysis. In U. Teichler(Ed.), The formative years of scholars (Vol. 83, pp. 67–78). Wenner-Gren International SeriesPortland Press doi:10.14361/9783839404683-007
  • Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (revised ed.). Westchester, IL: Follett.
  • Kram, K. E. (1984). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. lLanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Kuipers, J. L. (2011). PhD and EdD degrees for mid-career professionals: Fielding Graduate University. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 129(129), 63–73. doi:10.1002/ace.401
  • Lovitts, B. W. (2001). Leaving the Ivory Tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
  • Lynn, L. K., Stadtlander, L., Inman, D., & Burkholder, G. J. (2023). Data-informed strategies to prepare and support online faculty as doctoral capstone mentors. New Directions in Teaching and Learning. Office of Research and Doctoral Services, Walden University.
  • Malen, B., & Brown, T. M. (2020). What matters to mentees: Centering their voices. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(4), 480–497. doi:10.1080/13611267.2020.1793086
  • Malina, K. S., Stander, M., & Nell, W. (2019). Positive leadership: Moving towards an integrated definition and interventions. In L. E. Van Zyl & S. Rothmann Sr.(Eds.), Theoretical Approaches to Multi-Cultural Positive Psychological Interventions (pp. 201–228). 10.1007/978-3-030-20583-6_9
  • Mason, A., & Hickman, J. (2019). Students supporting students on the PhD journey: An evaluation of a mentoring scheme for international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 88–98. doi:10.1080/14703297.2017.1392889
  • Miller, B. (2020). Graduate school debt: Ideas for reducing the $37 Billion in annual student loans that no one is talking about. Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-postsecondary/reports/2020/01/13/479220/graduate-school-debt/
  • Nasiri, F., & Mafekheri, F. (2015). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962–1969. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
  • National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2019. NSF, 21–308. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21308/
  • National Education Center for Statistics. (2020). Total postbaccalaureate fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by attendance status, sex of student, and control of institution: 1970 through 2029. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_303.80.asp
  • Percy, W. H., Kostere, K., & Kostere, S. (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 76–85. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2097
  • Pollard, R., & Kumar, S. (2021). Mentoring graduate students online: Strategies and challenges. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 22(2), 267–284. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5093
  • Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2020). Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Limited.
  • Rogers-Shaw, C., Carr-Chellman, D., & Choi, J. (2021). A trioethnography of organic Mentoring in the doctoral process. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(4), 389–411. doi:10.1080/13611267.2021.1952394
  • Russell, D. L. (2021). Design, development, implementation, and support (DDIS): Supporting online nontraditional doctoral candidates. Higher Learning Research Communications, 11(1), 14–26. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v11i1.1186
  • Salter, D. (2013). One university’s approach to defining and supporting professional doctorates. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1175–1184. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.833030
  • Schulz, W. C., & Morgan, A. M. (2022). Developing a learning model for caring, inclusion, and social change in an online environment. In McCune (Ed.), Advancing DEI and creating inclusive environments in the online space (pp. 1–23). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5146-5.ch001
  • Scott-Clayton, J., & Li, J. (2016). Black – White disparity in student loan debt more than triples after graduation. The Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/research/black-white-disparity-in-student-loan-debt-more-thantriples-after-graduation/
  • Spiekermann, L., Lawrence, E., Lyons, M., & Deutsch, N. (2021). A qualitative analysis of the utility of a competency framework for mentor training. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(5), 565–585. doi:10.1080/13611267.2021.1986793
  • Spillett, M. A., & Moisiewicz, K. A. (2004). Cheerleader, coach, counselor, critic: Support and challenge roles of the dissertation advisor. College Student Journal, 38(2), 246–256.
  • Stadtlander, L. (2021). Positive leadership theory for online dissertation mentoring. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(1), 425–438. doi:10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.1.30
  • Stadtlander, L., Ozcan, A., Johnson, L., Nicholson, B., & Hyder, N. (2022). Faculty and student online mentoring preferences. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), xx–xx. doi:10.5590/JERAP.2022.12.1.22
  • Taylor, M., Turk, J. M., Chessman, H. M., & Espinosa, L. L. (2020). Race and ethnicity in higher education: 2020 supplement. American Council on Education. http://1xfsu31b52d33idlp13twtos-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/REHE-2020-Chapter-3-individual.pdf
  • Templeton, N. R., Jeong, S., & Pugliese, E. (2021). Editorial overview: Mentoring for targeted growth in professional practice. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(4), 349–352. doi:10.1080/13611267.2021.1962589
  • Templeton, N. R., Jeong, S., Pugliese, E., & Villarreal, E. (2021). Editorial overview: Becoming a good, effective mentor in academia. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(5), 495–499. doi:10.1080/13611267.2021.1986798
  • Vlachopoulos, D. (2022). How the “Lessons Learned” from emergency remote teaching can enrich European higher education in the post-COVID-19 era. Higher Learning Research Communications, 12, 147–156. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v12i0.1357
  • Williams, P. E., Wall, N., & Fish, W. W. (2019). Mid-career adult learners in an online doctoral Program and the drivers of their academic self-regulation: The importance of social support and parent education level. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 20(1), 63–78. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3789
  • Yob, I. M., & Crawford, L. (2012). Conceptual framework for mentoring doctoral students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 2(3), 1–14. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.