Not in their name: re-interpreting discourses of STEM learning through the subjective experiences of minoritized girls

References

• Bang, M., and D. Medin. 2010. “Cultural Processes in Science Education: Supporting the Navigation of Multiple Epistemologies.” Science Education 94 (6): 1008–1026. doi:10.1002/sce.v94:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., and S. Vossoughi. 2016. “Participatory Design Research and Educational Justice: Studying Learning and Relations within Social Change Making.” 34 (3): 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., B. Warren, A. S. Rosebery, and D. Medin. 2012. “Desettling Expectations in Science Education.” Human Development 55 (5–6): 302–318. doi:10.1159/000345322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J., K. Au, A. F. Ball, P. Bell, E. Gordon, K. Gutiérrez, S. Brice-Heath et al. 2007. Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle: The LIFE Center and the Center for Multicultural Education, University of Washington doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., and E. Tan. 2009. “Funds of Knowledge and Discourses and Hybrid Space.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (1): 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.20269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., and K. Yang. 2000. “The Culture of Power and Science Education: Learning from Miguel.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (8): 871–889. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<871::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. 2013. “Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention.” FabLabs 4: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2008. “Promoting ‘Relational Equity’ and High Mathematics Achievement through an Innovative Mixed-Ability Approach.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (2): 167–194. doi:10.1080/01411920701532145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booker, A. 2010. “Framing Youth Civic Participation: Technical, Pragmatic, and Political Learning.” In Educating comprehensively: Varieties of educational experiences, ed. L. Lin, H. Varenne, and E. W. Gordon, 209–31. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brotman, J. S., and F. M. Moore. 2008. “Girls and Science: A Review of Four Themes in the Science Education Literature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (9): 971–1002. doi:10.1002/tea.20241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds “Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• C. Bullock, E. 2017. “Only STEM Can Save Us? Examining Race, Place, and STEM Education as Property.” Educational Studies 53 (6): 628–641. doi:10.1080/00131946.2017.1369082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes-Soon, C. G. 2016. “Mujeres Truchas: Urban Girls Redefining Smartness in a Dystopic Global South.” Race Ethnicity and Education 19 (6): 1209–1222. doi:10.1080/13613324.2016.1168543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., and R. A. Lotan. 2004. “Equity in Heterogeneous Classrooms.” Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education 2: 736–750.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., R. A. Lotan, B. A. Scarloss, and A. R. Arellano. 1999. “Complex Instruction: Equity in Cooperative Learning Classrooms.” Theory into Practice 38 (2): 80–86. doi:10.1080/00405849909543836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, C., and C. Hill. 2015. Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women’s Success in Engineering and Computing. American Association of University Women, Washington, DC: AAUW. www.aauw.org.
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. 1988. “The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children.” Harvard Educational Review 58 (3): 280–299. doi:10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denner, J., L. Werner, and E. Ortiz. 2012. “Computer Games Created by Middle School Girls: Can They be used to Measure Understanding of Computer Science Concepts?” Computers & Education 58 (1): 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 1986. “Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching.” In M. Wittrock (Ed.)Handbook of Research on Teaching 119–161.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., R. Bagrodia, A. Cook-Sather, M. Espinoza, S. Jurow, J. J. Shultz, and J. Spencer. 2008. “Students’ Experience of School Curriculum: The Everyday Circumstances of Granting and Withholding Assent to Learn.” In The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction, edited by F. Michael Connelly, M. F. He, and J. Phillion, 198–218. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza, M. L., and S. Vossoughi. 2014. “Perceiving Learning Anew: Social Interaction, Dignity, and Educational Rights.” Harvard Educational Review 84 (3): 285–313. doi:10.17763/haer.84.3.y4011442g71250q2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco, C. 2013. The Bodies that Were Not Ours: And Other Writings. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. 2017. Good Reception: Teens, Teachers, and Mobile Media in a Los Angeles High School. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gholson, M. L. 2016. “Clean Corners and Algebra: A Critical Examination of the Constructed Invisibility of Black Girls and Women in Mathematics.” The Journal of Negro Education 85 (3): 290–301. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.3.0290.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., and S. Vossoughi. 2010. “Lifting off the Ground to Return Anew: Mediated Praxis, Transformative Learning, and Social Design Experiments.” Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2): 100–117. doi:10.1177/0022487109347877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. 2017. “Living Mathematx: Towards a Vision for the Future.” Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32..
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. 2012. “Connecting Community, Critical, and Classical Knowledge in Teaching Mathematics for Social Justice.” In In B. Sriraman (Ed.) Alternative Forms of Knowing (In) Mathematics, 300–311. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2016. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives. Syracuse, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. 2002. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, E. B. 1993. Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber, eds. 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, A. M., M. Miles, and J. Saldaña. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardo, Z., and A. Broderick. 2011. “Smartness as Property: A Critical Exploration of Intersections between Whiteness and Disability Studies.” Teachers College Record 113 (10): 2206–2232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva, L. A. 2017. “Unpacking the Male Superiority Myth and Masculinization of Mathematics at the Intersections: A Review of Research on Gender in Mathematics Education.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 48 (4): 397–433. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. B. 2003. “Hidden Assumptions and Unaddressed Questions in Mathematics for All Rhetoric.” The Mathematics Educator 13 (2): 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., and J. Raley. 2011. “Looking Closely: Toward a Natural History of Human Ingenuty.” In In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, 372–391. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, E. O. 2013. “High-Achieving Black Students, Biculturalism, and Out-Of-School STEM Learning Experiences: Exploring Some Unintended Consequences.” Journal of Urban Mathematics Education 6 (2): 20–41.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., and M. Bang. 2014. Who’s Asking?: Native Science, Western Science, and Science Education. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melamed, J. 2011. Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing Violence in the New Racial Capitalism. Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, R., and C. E. Cobb. 2002. Radical Equations: Civil Rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S. 2002. “Identity, Goals, and Learning: Mathematics in Cultural Practice.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4 (2–3): 213–247. doi:10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., and S. Vakil. 2017. “STEM-focused Academies in Urban Schools: Tensions and Possibilities.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 26 (3): 376–406. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2001. “Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics, Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.” edited by J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell. Washington, DC:: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2012. “Science and Engineering Indicators 2012.” NS Foundation (Eds). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, S. 2009. “Multicultural Education in the United States: Historical Realities, Ongoing Challenges, and Transformative Possibilities.” In J.A. Banks (Ed.) The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education, 99–115. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, R. 2017. STEM Jobs: 2017 Update (ESA Issue Brief# 02–17). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Office of the Chief Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., and F. S. Azevedo. 2017. “Everyday Science Learning and Equity: Mapping the Contested Terrain.” Science Education 101 (4): 526–532. doi:10.1002/sce.21286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., A. Gupta, A. Elby, and C. Turpen. 2018. “Why Ideology Matters for Learning: A Case of Ideological Convergence in an Engineering Ethics Classroom Discussion on Drone Warfare.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 27 (2): 183–223. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1381964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkard, N., S. Erete, C. K. Martin, and M. McKinney de Royston. 2017. “Digital Youth Divas: Exploring Narrative-Driven Curriculum to Spark Middle School Girls’ Interest in Computational Activities.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 26 (3): 477–516. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (US). 2010. Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America’s Future: Executive Report. Executive Office of the President, President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. 2005. The Mind at Work: Valuing the Intelligence of the American Worker. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., M. Ogonowski, M. DiSchino, and B. Warren. 2010. “The Coat Traps All Your Body Heat”: Heterogeneity as Fundamental to Learning.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (3): 322–357. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scipio, D. 2017. “Pedagogies of Joy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the American Education Research Association, San Antonio, April 27-May1.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T. 2009. “Partnerships as Mathematical Practice: How Managing the Dual Dimensions of Collaboration Organize Community in a Low-Track Algebra Class.” PhD diss., Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T. 2014. “Affinity through Mathematical Activity: Cultivating Democratic Learning Communities.” Journal of Urban Mathematics Education 7 (2): 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T., E. Redman, and N. Enyedy. 2013. “Re-Storying Practice: Using Stories about Students to Advance Mathematics Education Reform.” Teaching and Teacher Education 31: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil, S. 2018. “Ethics, Identity, and Political Vision: Toward a Justice-Centered Approach to Equity in Computer Science Education.” Harvard Educational Review 88 (1): 26–52. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-88.1.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., and S. Vakil. 2018. “Towards What Ends? A Critical Analysis of Militarism, Equity and STEM Education.” In T. Buenavista & A. Ali (Eds.). At War: Challenging Racism, Materialism, and Militarism in Education. New York, NY: Fordham University Press
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., P. K. Hooper, and E. Meg. 2016. “Making through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity.” Harvard Educational Review 86 (2): 206–232. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Vol. 8. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar