References
- Alter, A., & Neuwirth, E. (2018). The need for a next-generation research repository. Ex Libris. Retrieved from http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Need-for-a-Next-Gen-Research-Repository-Ex-Libris-Nov2018.pdf.
- Binghamton University Libraries, State University of New York. (2021). The Open Repository @ Binghamton (ORB).Retrieved from https://www.binghamton.edu/libraries/services/digital-preservation/orb/index.html.
- Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059–1078. doi:10.1002/asi.22634
- Brown University Library. (2022). Digital object identifiers. Retrieved from https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/doi/.
- Carnegie Mellon University Libraries. (2021). About KiltHub. KiltHub Repository. Retrieved from https://library.cmu.edu/kilthub/about.
- Cornell University Library. (2021). Services, scholarly communication and open access, digital repositories. Retrieved from https://www.library.cornell.edu/services/scholarly.
- Cornell University, Research Data Management Service Group (RDMSG). (2022). Data storage finder. Retrieved from https://finder.research.cornell.edu/storage.
- Daoutis, C., & Rodriguez-Marquez, M. (2018). Library-mediated deposit: A gift to researchers or a curse on open access? Reflections from the case of Surrey. Open Access and the Library. MDPI, 6(2), 20–21. doi:10.3390/publications6020020
- Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4), 3. Retrieved from https://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.
- Diekema, A., Wesolek, A., & Walters, C. D. (2014). The NSF/NIH effect: Surveying the effect of data management requirements on faculty, sponsored programs, and institutional repositories. Library Faculty & Staff Publications, Utah State University, Paper 158. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/lib_pubs/158.
- Elster, J. (2009). Reason and Rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Fondren Library, Rice University. (2022). Rice digital scholarship archive FAQ home. Retrieved from https://digitalriceprojects.pbworks.com/w/page/93841001/Rice%20Digital%20Scholarship%20Archive%20FAQ%20home#WhatistheRiceDigitalScholarshipArchive.
- Givens, M., Macklin, L. A., & Mangiafico, P. (2017). Faculty profile systems: New services and roles for libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(2), 235–255. Retrieved from doi:10.1353/pla.2017.0014
- Homenda, N. (2021). Persistent URLs and citations offered for digital objects by digital libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 40(2), 1–12. Retrieved from doi:10.6017/ital.v40i2.12987
- Joo, S., & Peters, C. (2020). User needs assessment for research data services in a research university. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(3), 633–646. Retrieved from doi:10.1177/0961000619856073
- Kim, Y. (2018). Reputation, trust, and norms as mechanisms leading to academic reciprocity in data sharing: An empirical test of theory of collective action. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 244–253. Retrieved from doi:10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501027
- Kim, Y., & Oh, J. S. (2021). Researchers' article sharing through institutional repositories and ResearchGate: A comparison study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(3), 475–413. Retrieved from doi:10.1177/0961000620962840
- Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2015). 101 Innovations in scholarly communication – The changing research workflow. Poster presented at the Force 11 Conference, January 12–13, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Retrieved from 10.6084/m9.figshare.1286826.v1.
- Lee, D. J., & Stvilia, B. (2017). Practices of research data curation in institutional repositories: A qualitative view from repository staff. Plos One, 12(3)Retrieved from doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173987
- Levin, J., & Milgrom, P. (2004). Introduction to choice theory. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/∼jdlevin/Econ%20202/Choice%20Theory.pdf.
- McClure, A. (2008). Chief business officers speak out: Four campus business leaders discuss daily and long-term challenges, from breaking down silos across campus to controlling tuition. University Business, 11(10), 50–52.
- Montclair State University, Sprague Library. (2021). Data management. Retrieved from https://montclair.libguides.com/c.php?g=815572&p=6019594.
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rele, S., & Young, J. (2017). How automated workflows helped us ingest 600 faculty publications in three months in LMU's institutional repository! University of San Diego Digital Initiative Symposium. Retrieved from https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1099&context=symposium.
- Scherer, D. (2015). Incentivizing them to come: Strategies, tools, and opportunities for marketing an institutional repository. In B. B. Callicott, D. Scherer, & A. Wesolek (Eds.), Making institutional repositories work (pp. 159–174). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. Retrieved from doi:10.2307/j.ctt1wf4drg.17
- Scherer, D., Byrne, K., Hahnel, M., & Valen, D. (2020). Collaborative approaches to integrate repositories within the research information ecosystem: Creating bridges for common goals. The Serials Librarian, 78(1–4), 181–190. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2020.1728169
- Stanford University Libraries. (2022). Data services, DOI services. Retrieved from https://library.stanford.edu/data-services/doi-services.
- The Sheridan Libraries, Johns Hopkins University. (2021). Open access: Institutional repositories. Retrieved from https://guides.library.jhu.edu/open-access/repositories.
- The University of Oklahoma, University Libraries. (2022). Understand DOIs. Retrieved from https://libraries.ou.edu/content/understand-dois.
- Ukwoma, S. C., & Dike, V. W. (2017). Academics' attitudes toward the utilization of institutional repositories in Nigerian Universities. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(1), 17–32. doi:10.1353/pla.2017.0002
- University of Michigan, Office of Research and Sponsored Projects (ORSP). (2021). Data sharing resources and policies, University of Michigan resources. Retrieved from https://orsp.umich.edu/set-project/data-sharing-resources-and-policies.
- University of Missouri Libraries. (2018). Data management plans: Submitting data to MOspace institutional repository. Retrieved from https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=28117&p=173329.
- University of Tampa, MacDonald-Kelce Library. (2021). Institutional repository UoTIR: DOI service. Retrieved from https://utopia.ut.edu/repository/DOI#s-lg-box-25997720.
- University of Washington. Office of Research. (2021). My research lifecycle: Closeout, data sharing. Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/research/myresearch-lifecycle/closeout/data-sharing/.
- Van den Eynden, V., & Bishop, L. (2014). Sowing the seed: Incentives and motivations for sharing research data, a researcher's perspective. A Knowledge Exchange Report. Retrieved from https://arkivum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/KE_report-incentives-for-sharing-researchdata.pdf.