Ravi: A formal framework for authoring interactive narratives

References

• Aarseth, E. (2012). A narrative theory of games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 129–133). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2282338.2282365.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, B. C., & Young, R. M. (2008). A use of flashback and foreshadowing for surprise arousal in narrative using a plan-based approach. In U. Spierling & N. Szilas (Eds.), Interactive storytelling (pp. 156–167). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Barrenho, F., Romão, T., Martins, T., & Correia, N. (2006). In authoring environment: Interfaces for creating spatial stories and gaming activities. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 9–es). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178835.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(3), 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, K. M. (1999). Metalinear cinematic narrative: Theory, process, and tool [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Cavazza, M., Charles, F., & Mead, S. J. (2002). Planning characters' behaviour in interactive storytelling. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 13(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/vis.v13:2
   Google Scholar
• Cheong, Y. G., Kim, Y. J., Min, W. H., Shim, E. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2008). PRISM: A framework for authoring interactive narratives. In U. Spierling & N. Szilas (Eds.), Interactive storytelling (pp. 297–308). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donikian, S., & Portugal, J. N. (2004). Writing interactive fiction Scenarii with DraMachina. In S. Göbel et al. (Eds.), Technologies for interactive digital storytelling and entertainment (pp. 101–112). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, P., Kipp, M., Klesen, M., & Rist, T. (2003). Authoring scenes for adaptive, interactive performances. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 725–732). Association for Computing Machinery.https://doi.org/10.1145/860575.860692.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, A., & Kou, L. T. (1974). Multiple-entry finite automata. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0000(74)80034-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan, P., & Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2010). Second person: Role-playing and story in games and playable media. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Ian. (2014). A web-based editor for multiplayer choice games. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, P. (1996). Narrative structures for new media: Towards a new definition. Leonardo, 29(5), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/1576398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenitz, H. (2011). Extensible tools for practical experiments in IDN: The advanced stories authoring and presentation system. In Interactive storytelling (pp. 79–84). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Koenitz, H. (2015a). Design approaches for interactive digital narrative. In Interactive storytelling (pp. 50–57). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Koenitz, H. (2015b). Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. In Interactive digital narrative (pp. 107–121). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kybartas, B., & Bidarra, R. (2017). A survey on story generation techniques for authoring computational narratives. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 9(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2016.2546063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landow, G. (1997). Hypertext 2.0. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Laurel, B., & Strickland, R. (1994). PLACEHOLDER: Landscape and narrative in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 121–127). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/192593.192637.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Clinton, J. A., O'Brien, E. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2018). Detecting differences between adapted narratives: Implication of order of modality on exposure. In Empirical comics research (pp. 284–304). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, C. (2021, June). Ceptre: A language for modeling generative interactive systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 11(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v11i1.12784
   Google Scholar
• Martens, C., & Iqbal, O. (2019). Villanelle: An authoring tool for autonomous characters in interactive fiction. In R. E. Cardona-Rivera, A. Sullivanand, & R. M. Young (Eds.), Interactive storytelling (pp. 290–303). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, S. (2013). On games and links: Extending the vocabulary of agency and immersion in interactive narratives. In Interactive storytelling (pp. 25–34). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mateas, M., & Stern, A. (2021, September). Structuring content in the façade interactive drama architecture. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, 1(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v1i1.18722
   Google Scholar
• Medler, B., & Magerko, B. (2006). Scribe: A tool for authoring event driven interactive drama. In S. Göbel, R. Malkewitzand, & I. Iurgel (Eds.), Technologies for interactive digital storytelling and entertainment (pp. 139–150). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, N. (2003). Twisty little passages: An approach to interactive fiction. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porteous, J., Cavazza, M., & Charles, F. (2010). Narrative generation through characters' point of view. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 1297–1304). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, M. O., & Young, R. M. (2005). Open-world planning for story generation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1719–1720). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, C., van Nuenen, T., & Koenitz, H. (2018). Ludonarrative hermeneutics: A way out and the narrative paradox. In Interactive storytelling (pp. 93–106). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. L. (2006). Avatars of story. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, A., Mathur, K., Thukral, A., Singhal, N., & Parnami, A. (2019). Aesop: Authoring engaging digital storytelling experiences. In The Adjunct Publication of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 56–59). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332167.3357114.
   Google Scholar
• Shibolet, Y., Knoller, N., & Koenitz, H. (2018). A framework for classifying and describing authoring tools for interactive digital narrative. In Interactive storytelling (pp. 523–533). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skorupski, J., Jayapalan, L., Marquez, S., & Mateas, M. (2007). Wide ruled: A friendly interface to author-goal based story generation. In M. Cavazza & S. Donikian (Eds.), Virtual storytelling. using virtual reality technologies for storytelling (pp. 26–37). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Spierling, U., & Szilas, N. (2009). Authoring issues beyond tools. In Interactive storytelling (pp. 50–61). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Spierling, U., Weiß, S. A., & Müller, W. (2006). Towards accessible authoring tools for interactive storytelling. In S. Göbel, R. Malkewitzand, & I. Iurgel (Eds.), Technologies for interactive digital storytelling and entertainment (pp. 169–180). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Swartjes, I., & Theune, M. (2009). Iterative authoring using story generation feedback: Debugging or co-creation? In Interactive storytelling (pp. 62–73). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. M., & Riedl, M. O. (2005). Integrating plan-based behavior generation with game environments. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 370). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178477.1178553.
   Google Scholar
• Zagalo, N., Göbel, S., Torres, A., Malkewitz, R., & Branco, V. (2006). INSCAPE: Emotion expression and experience in an authoring environment. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (pp. 219–230). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11944577_23.
   Google Scholar