Sourcing public policy: organisation publishing in Wikipedia

References

• Arbuckle, A., Siemens, R., Bath, J., Crompton, C., Estill, L., Niemann, T., … Siemens, L. (2022). An open social scholarship path for the humanities. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 25(2), https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.1973
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo-Machado, W., Torres-Salinas, D., & Costas, R. (2022a). Wikinfometrics. Retrieved 1 August, 2023, from https://wenceslao-arroyo-machado.shinyapps.io/wikinformetrics/
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo-Machado, W., Torres-Salinas, D., & Costas, R. (2022b). Wikinformetrics: Construction and description of an open Wikipedia knowledge graph data set for informetric purposes. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00226
   Google Scholar
• Avieson, B. (2019). Breaking news on Wikipedia: Collaborating, collating and competing. First Monday, 24(5), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i5.9530
   Google Scholar
• Avieson, B. (2022). Editors, sources and the ‘go back’ button: Wikipedia’s framework for beating misinformation. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i11.12754
   Google Scholar
• Baltz, S. (2021, February 24). Wikipedia’s political science coverage is biased. I tried to fix it. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/24/wikipedias-political-science-coverage-is-biased-i-tried-fix-it/
   Google Scholar
• Bruckman, A. S. (2022). Should you believe Wikipedia?: Online communities and the construction of knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780704
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., Heikkila, T., & Wood, M. (2019). Making policy in a complex world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108679053
   Google Scholar
• Cantallops, M. M., Sánchez-Alonso, S., & Barriocanal, E. G. (2019). A systematic literature review on Wikidata. Data Technol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-12-2018-0110
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, C., Antranikian, L., Truong, R., & Maskell, P. (2020). Familiar wikidata: The case for building a data source We Can trust. Pop! Public Open. Participatory, 2. https://www.popjournal.ca/issue02/crompton
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H., Boaz, A., Nutley, S. M., & Fraser, A. (2019). Conclusion: Lessons from the past, prospects for future. In A. Boaz, H. Davies, A. Fraser, & S. Nutley (Eds.), What works now? Evidence-informed policy and practice (pp. 369–382). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehdarirad, T., Didegah, F., & Sotudeh, H. (2018). Which type of research is cited more often in Wikipedia? A case study of PubMed Research. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/65240
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H. (2022). Writing the revolution. MTI Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262046299/writing-the-revolution/
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H., & Graham, M. (2016). Provenance, power and place: Linked data and opaque digital geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 957–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816668857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, H., Sen, S., Musicant, D. R., & Miller, N. (2013). Getting to the source. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. (world). https://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491064
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2018). Influence seekers: The production of grey literature for policy and practice. Information Services and Use, 37, 389–403. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170857
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2022). Research use and publishing diversity: The role of organisation research publishing for policy and practice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewoniewski, W. (2022). Identification of important Web sources of information on Wikipedia across various topics and languages. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 3290–3299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.387
   Google Scholar
• Lewoniewski, W. (2024). BestRef. https://bestref.net
   Google Scholar
• Lewoniewski, W., Węcel, K., & Abramowicz, W. (2020). Modeling popularity and reliability of sources in multilingual Wikipedia. Information, 11(5), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11050263
   Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. A. (2013). Materiality and media in communication and technology studies: An unfinished project. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 21–51). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. A., & Loader, B. D. (Eds). (2020). Routledge handbook of digital media and communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616551
   Google Scholar
• Luyt, B. (2021). Representation and the problem of bibliographic imagination on Wikipedia. Journal of Documentation, 78(5), 1075–1091. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2021-0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyt, B., & Tan, D. (2010). Improving Wikipedia’s credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 715–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, B. H., Soomai, S. S., De Santo, E. M., & Wells, P. G. (Eds). (2016). Science, information, and policy interface for effective coastal and ocean management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21483
   Google Scholar
• Mahood, Q., Eerd, D. V., & Irvin, E. (2014). Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: Challenges and benefits. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, M., Oreskes, N., Jamieson, D., Brysse, K., O’Reilly, J., Shindell, M., & Wazeck, M. (2019). Discerning experts: The practices of scientific assessment for environmental policy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022, June 16). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01833
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, R. E., & Ross, R. (2020). Making grey literature discoverable and impactful on JSTOR through comprehensive search and rich metadata. The Serials Librarian, 79(3–4), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2020.1847740
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H., West, R., & Colavizza, G. (2021). Wikipedia citations: A comprehensive data set of citations with identifiers extracted from English Wikipedia. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00105
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Salinas, D., Romero-Frías, E., & Arroyo-Machado, W. (2019). Mapping the backbone of the Humanities through the eyes of Wikipedia. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellstead, A. M., & Howlett, M. (2022). (Re)Thinking think tanks in the age of policy labs: The rise of knowledge-based policy influence organisations. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(1), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., & Lewis, J. M. (2021). Understanding, measuring, and encouraging public policy research impact. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80(3), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMF. (2018, April 5). What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let’s ask the data. Retrieved 13 March, 2023, from Down the Rabbit Hole, Medium website: https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/what-are-the-ten-most-cited-sources-on-wikipedia-lets-ask-the-data-34071478785a
   Google Scholar
• WMF. (2023). Wikicite/Shared citations. Wikimedia Foundation. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiCite/Shared_Citations
   Google Scholar
• WMF. (2024). Assessing the child rights impacts of wikimedia free knowledge projects. Wikimedia Foundation, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ArticleOne_-_WMF_Child_Rights_Impact_Assessment_Report_2023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023a). Citing sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023b). Identifying reliable sources (medicine) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023c). Identifying reliable sources (science) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(science)
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023d). Neutral point of view. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023e). No original research. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023f). Policies and guidelines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023g). Reliable sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023h). Reliable sources noticeboard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023i). Reliable sources/Perennial sources. 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023j). Tiers of reliability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tiers_of_reliability
   Google Scholar
• WP. (2023k). Verifiability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
   Google Scholar
• Yang, P., & Colavizza, G. (2022a). A map of science in Wikipedia. Companion proceedings of the Web conference 2022 (WWW ‘22 companion), April 25–29, 2022, virtual event, Lyon, France. A.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, P., & Colavizza, G. (2022b, November 21). Polarization and reliability of news sources in Wikipedia. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.16065
   Google Scholar
• Zia, L., Johnson, I., Mansurov, B., Morgan, J., Redi, M., Saez-Trumper, D., & Taraborelli, D. (2019). Knowledge Integrity—Wikimedia Research 2030. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7704626.v2
   Google Scholar