How do people interpret the value concept? Development and evaluation of the value conceptualisation scale using a mixed method approach

References

• Altemeyer, B. 2002. “Dogmatic Behavior among Students: Testing a New Measure of Dogmatism.” The Journal of Social Psychology 142 (6): 713–721. doi:10.1080/00224540209603931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. H., and M. Kaase. 2014. “Konventionelle politische Partizipation.” Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen.
   Google Scholar
• Beierlein, C., F. Asbrock, M. Kauff, and P. Schmidt. 2014. “Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3). Ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritärer Einstellungen.” GESIS-Working Papers 35.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. 2010. “Documentary Method an Group Discussions.” In Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research, edited by R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, and W. Weller, 99–124. Opladen: B.Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. A., and H. G. Law. 1985. “Structure of Human Values: Testing the Adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1): 250–263. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson, C. M. 2004. “An Exploration of the Concept of Values-led Principalship.” Australian Cathlic University.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2006. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done?.” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 97–113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2015. Business Research Methods. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collani, G., and H. Blank. 2013. “Konsistenzstreben.” Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen ZIS Version 15.00.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Londin: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deth, J. W. 1983. “The Persistence of Materialist and Post‐Materialist Value Orientations.” European Journal of Political Research 11 (1): 63–79. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1983.tb00043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. 2017. “Scale Development: Theory and Applications.” Applied Social Research Methods Series. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Essen, L., and C. Giese. 2010. “Wertebildung in Familien.” In Wertebildung in Jugendarbeit, Schule und Kommune, edited by W. Schubarth, K. Speck, and H. von Berg, 315–327, Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., A. Heath, and M. Lalljee. 1996. “Measuring Left-right and Libertarian-authoritarian Values in the British Electorate.” British Journal of Sociology 47 (1): 93–112. doi:10.2307/591118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, T. D., J. N. Edwards, S. Vorakitphokatorn, and S. Sermsri. 1993. “Using focus groups to adapt survey instruments to new populations: Experience from a developing country.”In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, 89–104. SAGE Focus Editions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, D. R. 1969. “Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-retest Correlation.” American Sociological Review 34: 93–101. doi:10.2307/2092790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, H. 2013. Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Klages, H., H.-J. Hippler, and W. Herbert. 1992. Werte und Wandel: Ergebnisse und Methoden einer Forschungstradition. New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, T. 1991. “Zur Bedeutung von Alters-, Perioden-und Generationseinflüssen für den Wandel politischer Werte in der Bundesrepublik.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20 (2): 138–146. doi:10.1515/zfsoz-1991-0206.
   Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, C. 1951. “Values and Value-orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification.” In Towards a General Theory of Action, edited by T. Parsons and E. A. Shils, 388–439. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, K. D. 2000. “Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, Validity, and Applicability to Interpersonal Problems and Personality Disorders.” Journal of Personality Assessment 75 (2): 249–267. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lück, H., and E. Timaeus. 2014. “Soziale Erwünschtheit (SDS-CM).” Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen 15.
   Google Scholar
• Luyt, R. 2012. “A Framework for Mixing Methods in Quantitative Measurement Development, Validation, and Revision: A Case Study.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (4): 294–316. doi:10.1177/1558689811427912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, J. M., and D. J. Good. 2016. “The Moral Metacognition Scale: Development and Validation.” Ethics & Behavior 26 (5). doi:10.1080/10508422.2015.1028548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menold, N., and K. Bogner. 2015. “Gestaltung von Ratingskalen in Fragebögen.” SDM Survey Guidelines. GESIS - Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Vol. 16. Thousand Oaks, CA; SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Nassar-McMillan, S. C., M. Wyer, M. Oliver-Hoyo, and A. Ryder-Burge. 2010. “Using Focus Groups in Preliminary Instrument Development: Expected and Unexpected Lessons Learned.” The Qualitative Report 15 (6): 1621–1632.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. 1993. “Improving Survey Questionnaires through Focus Groups.” Paper presented at the An earlier version of these findings was presented at the conference on Focus Groups and Group Interviews: Advancing the State of the Art, Portland, Oregon, October 4–6 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., and C. Peterson. 2006. “Moral Competence and Character Strengths among Adolescents: The Development and Validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth.” Journal of Adolescence 29 (6): 891–909. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V., J. J. Clarkson, Z. L. Tormala, and K. S. Hendrix. 2010. “Perceiving Stability as a Means to Attitude Certainty: The Role of Implicit Theories of Attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 874–883. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, R. 2011. Zukunft, Werte, Europa: die Europäische Wertestudie 1990–2010: Österreich im Vergleich. Wien, Austria: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., C. J. Kemper, M. C. Klein, C. Beierlein, and A. Kovaleva. 2013. “A Short Scale for Assessing the Big Five Dimensions of Personality.” Metoden, Daten, Analysen 7 (2): 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel, U. 2009. “Was macht Menschen zu dem, was sie sind? Der Glaube an sozialen Determinismus als essentialistische Laientheorie in der sozialen Informationsverarbeitung.” Universität Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Rohan, M. J. 2000. “A Rose by Any Name? the Values Construct.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4 (3): 255–277. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 1983. “Biographieforschung und narratives Interview.” Neue Praxis 13 (3): 283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 2003. “A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations.” Questionnaire Package of the European Social Survey: 259–290.
   Google Scholar
• Spates, J. L. 1983. “The Sociology of Values.” Annual Review of Sociology 9: 27–49. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.000331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieß, E. 2000. “Berufliche Werte, Formen der Kooperation und Arbeitszufriedenheit.” Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung 31 (2): 185–196. doi:10.1007/s11612-000-0017-0.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2011. “Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis.” Qualitative Research Journal 11 (2): 63–75. doi:10.3316/QRJ1102063.
   Google Scholar
• Thome, H. 2003. “Soziologische Wertforschung: Ein von Niklas Luhmann inspirierter Vorschlag für die engere Verknüpfung von Theorie und Empirie.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32 (1): 4–28.
   Google Scholar
• Verwiebe, R., L. Seewann, and M. Wolf. 2018. “Zur Relevanz verschiedener Lebensbereiche für die Entstehung individueller Werthaltungen. Aktuelle Befunde für Österreich aus einer Mixed-Methods-Studie.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 43 (2): 179–201. doi:10.1007/s11614-018-0305-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, B., J. Knodel, and W. Sittitrai. 1993. “Focus Groups and Surveys as Complementary Research Methods.” Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art 156: 118–136.
   Google Scholar
• Zupan, K. A. 2012. “Values, Conflicts & Value Conflict Resolution: An Investigation of the Experience of Educational Administrators.” University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar