3,490
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Making political citizens? Migrants’ narratives of naturalization in the United KingdomFootnote*

, &
Pages 225-242 | Received 03 Mar 2017, Accepted 18 Feb 2018, Published online: 25 Apr 2018

References

  • Abraham, M., E. N. Chow, et al., eds. 2010. Contours of Citizenship. Women, Diversity and Practices of Citizenship. London: Ashgate.
  • Ahmed, S. 1998. Differences That Matter. Feminist Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511489389
  • Ahmed, S. 2000. Strange Encounters. Embodied Others in Post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
  • Ahmed, N. 2008. “Language, Gender and Citizenship: Obstacles in the Path to Learning English for Bangladeshi Women in London’s East End.” Sociological Research Online 13 (5): 12.
  • All Party Political Group on Social Integration. 2017. Interim Report into Integration of Immigrants. 5 January 2017. www.socialintegrationappg.org.uk
  • Althusser, L. 1977. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation), 121–173. Lenin and Philosophy and other essays. Surrey: Unwin Brothers Limited, The Gresham Press.
  • Anderson, B. 2013. Us and them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691593.001.0001
  • Anthias, F., and N. Yuval-Davis. 1989. Women, Nation, State. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Aptekar, S. 2015. The Road to Citizenship: What Naturalization Means for Immigrants in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • BBC. 2013. “UK Citizenship Test ‘to Cover Britain’s Greats’.” January 28. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21221773.
  • Bassel, L. 2016. “The Casey Review on Opportunity and Integration: Re-Inventing the Wheel.” Discover Society Accessed 9 December. http://discoversociety.org/2016/12/09/the-casey-review-on-opportunity-and-integration-re-inventing-the-wheel/
  • Bassel, L., P. Monforte, D. Bartram, K. Khan, and B. Misztal. 2017. The UK Citizenship Test Process: Exploring Migrants’ Experiences. Final Project Report. Leicester: University of Leicester. https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/sociology/research/uk-citizenship-process/final-report
  • Bishop, S. 2017. “Model Citizens: The Making of an American throughout the Naturalization Process.” Communication Culture & Critique 10: 479–498.10.1111/cccr.2017.10.issue-3
  • Blinder, S. 2016. Briefing: Naturalization as a British Citizen: Concepts and Trends. Fourth revision: The Migration Observatory University of Oxford.
  • Bloemraad, I. 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Brettell, C. 2006. “Political Belonging and Cultural Belonging: Immigration Status, Citizenship, and Identity among Four Immigrant Populations in a Southwestern City.” American Behavioral Scientist 50: 70–99.10.1177/0002764206289655
  • Brooks, T. 2013. The ‘Life in the United Kingdom’ Citizenship Test. is It Unfit for Purpose? Durham: Durham University.
  • Brown, W. 2003. “Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory and Event 7 (1): 10.
  • Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that Matter. on the Discursive Limits of 'Sex'. London: Routledge.
  • Byrne, B. 2014. Making Citizens. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137003218
  • Byrne, B. 2017. “Testing times: The Place of the Citizenship Test in the UK Immigration Regime and New Citizens.” Responses to It’ Sociology 51 (2): 323–338.
  • Casey, L. 2016. The Casey Review. A Review into Opportunity and Integration. London: Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. www.gov.uk/dclg.
  • Chauvin, S., and B. Garcés-Mascareñas. 2012. “Beyond Informal Citizenship: The New Moral Economy of Migrant Illegality.” International Political Sociology 6 (3): 241–259.10.1111/ips.2012.6.issue-3
  • Cooke, M. 2009. “Barrier or Entitlement? The Language and Citizenship Agenda in the United Kingdom.” Language Assessment Quarterly 6 (1): 71–77.10.1080/15434300802606580
  • Crick, B. 2010. “Civic Republicanism and Citizenship: The Challenge for Today.” In Active Citizenship: What could it Achieve and How? edited by B. Crick and A. Lockyer, 16–25. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Donato, K. M., D. Gabaccia, et al. 2006. “A Glass Half Full? Gender in Migration Studies.” International Migration Review 40 (1): 3–26.10.1111/imre.2006.40.issue-1
  • Fassin, D, and S. Mazouz. 2007. “Qu’est-Ce Que Devenir Français? La Naturalisation Comme Rite D'institution Républicain.” [What is it to become French? Naturalization as a rite of Republican Institution] Revue Française De Sociologie 48: 723–750.10.3917/rfs.484.0723
  • Fein, L. C., and J. B. Straughn. 2014. “How Citizenship Matters: Narratives of Stateless and Citizenship Choice in Estonia.” Citizenship Studies 18 (6–7): 690–706.10.1080/13621025.2014.944774
  • Fortier, A.-M. 2008. Multicultural Horizons: Diversity and the Limits of the Civil Nation. London: Routledge.
  • Fortier, A.-M. 2013. “What's the Big Deal? Naturalization and the Politics of Desire.” Citizenship Studies 17 (6–7).
  • Fortier, A.-M. 2017. “The Psychic Life of Policy: Desire, Anxiety and Citizenisation’ in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 37 (1): 3–21.10.1177/0261018316655934
  • Foucault, M. 1993. “About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth.” Political Theory 21 (2): 198–227.10.1177/0090591793021002004
  • Goodman, S. W. 2014. Immigration and Membership Politics in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107477865
  • Greenwood, J., and L. Robins. 2002. “Citizenship Tests and Education: Embedding a Concept.” Parliamentary Affairs 55: 505–522.10.1093/parlij/55.3.505
  • Home Office. 2015. Life in the United Kingdom. a Guide for New Residents. 3rd ed. London: The Stationary Office.
  • Independent Community Cohesion Review Team. 2001. Community Cohesion: Report of the Independent Review Team (the Cantle Report). London: Home Office.
  • Indra, D. 1999. “Not a ‘Room of One's Own’. Engendering Forced Migration Knowledge and Practice.” In Endgendering Forced Migration. Theory and Practice. edited by D. Indra, 1–22. Oxford, Berghahn Books.
  • Isin, E. F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 15–43. London: Zed Books.
  • Isin, E. F., and G. M. Nielsen. 2008. “Introduction.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 1–12. London: Zed Books.
  • Jones-Correa, M. 1998. Between Two Nations: The Political Predicament of Latinos in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Joppke, C. 2007. “Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe.” West European Politics 30 (1): 1–22.10.1080/01402380601019613
  • Khan, K. 2013. “Becoming British: A Migrant’s Journey.” PhD diss., University of Birmingham.
  • Kiwan, D. 2010. “Multiculturalism and Mutual Understanding.” In Active Citizenship: What Could it Achieve and How? edited by B. Crick and A. Lockyer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Kofman, E., A. Phizacklea, P. Raghuram, and R. Sales. 2000. Gender and International Migration in Europe: Employment, Welfare and Politics. London: Routledge.
  • Kostakopoulou, D. 2010. “Matters of Control: Integration Tests, Naturalization Reform and Probationary Citizenship in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (5): 829–846.
  • Löwenheim, O., and O. Gazit. 2009. “Power and Examination: A Critique of Citizenship Tests.” Security Dialogue 40 (2): 145–167.10.1177/0967010609103074
  • McNamara, T., and C. Roever. 2006. Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • McNay, L. 2008. Against Recognition. London: Policy Press.
  • McNevin, A. 2007. “Irregular Migrants, Neoliberal Geographies and Spatial Frontiers of ‘the Political’.” Review of International Studies 33 (4): 655–674.
  • Menjívar, C., and S. M. Lakhani. 2016. “Transformative Effects of Immigration Law: Immigrants’ Personal and Social Metamorphoses through Regularization.” American Journal of Sociology 121: 6.
  • Merolli, J. L. 2016. “Manufacturing Desire and Producing (Non-)Citizens: Integration Exams in Canada, the UK and Netherlands.” Citizenship Studies 20 (8): 957–72.10.1080/13621025.2016.1229192
  • Miller, P., and N. Rose. 2008. Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Miller-Idriss, C. 2006. “Everyday Understandings of Citizenship in Germany.” Citizenship Studies 10: 541–570.10.1080/13621020600954978
  • Monforte, P., L. Bassel, and K. Khan. 2018. “’Deserving Citizenship? Exploring Migrants’ Experiences of the ‘Citizenship Test’ Process in the United Kingdom’.” The British Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12351.
  • Morokvasic, M. 1984. “Birds of Passage are also Women.” International Migration Review 18 (4): 1–29.
  • Morokvasic, M., and C. Catarino 2007. “Une (in)Visibilité Multiforme.” Plein Droit: La Revue Du GISTI 75(décembre): 27–30.
  • Morrice, L. 2017. “Cultural Values, Moral Sentiments and the Fashioning of Gendered Migrant Identities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (3): 400–417.10.1080/1369183X.2016.1211005
  • Office for National Statistics. 2012. Ethnicity and National Identity in England and Wales 2011. 1–14. www.ons.gov.uk.
  • Pessar, P. 1999. “Engendering Migration Studies: The Case of New Immigrants in the United States.” American Behavioural Scientist 42 (2): 577–600.
  • Ryan, B. 2008. “Integration Requirements: A New Model in Migration Law.” Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law 22 (4): 303–316.
  • Ryan, B. (2010). “Country Report United Kingdom.” Integration and Naturalization Tests: The New Way to European Citizenship (INTEC). Centre for Migration Law, Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands. October.
  • Sasse, G. 2005. “Securitization or Securing Rights? Exploring the Conceptual Foundations of Policies towards Minorities and Migrants in Europe.” Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (4): 673–693.10.1111/jcms.2005.43.issue-4
  • Sayad, A. 1993. “Naturels et naturalisés.” [Natural and Naturalized]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 99: 26–35.10.3406/arss.1993.3059
  • Schinkel, W., and F. Van Houdt. 2010. “The Double Helix of Cultural Assimilationism and Neo-liberalism: Citizenship in Contemporary Governmentality.” The British Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 696–715.10.1111/bjos.2010.61.issue-4
  • Scott, J. W. 1992. “Experience.” In Feminists Theorise the Political, edited by J. Butler and J. W. Scott, 22–40. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Suvarierol, S., and K. Kirk. 2015. “Dutch Civic Integration Courses as Neoliberal Citizenship Rituals.” Citizenship Studies 19 (3–4): 248–266.10.1080/13621025.2015.1006578
  • Turner, J. 2014. “Testing the Liberal Subject: (in)Security, Responsibility and “Self-improvement” in the UK Citizenship Test.” Citizenship Studies 18 (3–4): 332–348.10.1080/13621025.2014.905273
  • Tyler, I. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
  • Van Houdt, F., S. Suvarierol, and W. Schinkel. 2011. “Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends towards “Earned Citizenship” in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands.” International Sociology 26 (3): 408–432.10.1177/0268580910393041
  • Van Oers, R. 2013. Deserving Citizenship. Citizenship Tests in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The Hague: Brill.
  • Vink, M. P., and G. de Groot. 2010. “Citizenship Attribution in Western Europe: International Framework and Domestic Trends.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (5): 713–734.10.1080/13691831003763914
  • Wonder Foundation. 2016. Empowerment through Education: Women Breaking the English Barrier. London: Wonder Foundation.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage.
  • Yuval-Davis, N., F. Anthias, and E. Kofman. 2005. “Secure Borders and Safe Haven and the Gendered Politics of Belonging: Beyond Social Cohesion.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (3): 513–535.