Discussing the human rights limits on loss of citizenship: a normative-legal perspective on egalitarian arguments regarding Dutch Nationality laws targeting Dutch-Moroccans

References

• A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Belmarsh case). 2004. 56 (UKHL).
   Google Scholar
• Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken. 2015. Advies Voorstel Wijziging Rijkswet Op Het Nederlanderschap i.v.m. Intrekken Van Het Nederlanderschap in Het Belang Van De Nationale Veiligheid. Den Haag: Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken.
   Google Scholar
• AIVD. 2017a. Jaarverslag. Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• AIVD. 2017b. Terugkeerders in Beeld. Den Haag: AIVD.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2017. Netherlands: Counter-Terrorism Bills Would Violate Human Rights and Undermine Rule of Law. Amnesty Interntional.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejeva v Latvia. 2009. App no 55707/00 (ECtHR, 18 February).
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, E., and D. B. Roel. 2016. “Belgian and Dutch Jihadist Foreign Fighters (2012–2015): Characteristics, Motivations, and Roles in the War in Syria and Iraq.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 27(5): 837.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2014. The Return of Banishment: Whose Bad Guys are Terrorists? Florence: EU Observatory on Citizenship.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R., and V. Paskelev. 2015. “Cutting Genuine Links: A Normative Analysis of Citizenship Deprivation.” Georgetown 30: 48.
   Google Scholar
• Biao v Denmark. 2016. App no 38590/10 (ECtHR, 24 May).
   Google Scholar
• Bill 31813 (R1873), nr. 6 nota naar aanleiding van het verslag. 2008. Wijziging van de Rijkswet op het Nederlanderschap met betrekking tot meervoudige nationaliteit en andere nationaliteitsrechtelijke kwesties.
   Google Scholar
• Bill 34356 (R2064), nr. 3 Memorie van Toelichting. 2015. Wijziging van de Rijkswet op het Nederlanderschap in verband met het intrekken van het Nederlanderschap in het belang van de nationale veiligheid.
   Google Scholar
• Boekestein, T. L. 2019. “Deprivation of Nationality as a Counter-Terrorism Tool: A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and Dutch Legislation.” Transnational Human Rights Review 5, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, R., and T. Silverman. 2014. Western Foreign Fighters: Innovations in Responding to the Threat. London: Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers. 2014. Bill C-24, an Act to Amend the Citizenship Act and to Make Consequential Amendments to Other Acts. Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Citizenship Act. 1985. version prior to amendment by Bill C-6
   Google Scholar
• Carey, B. 2018. “Against the Right to Revoke Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 22 (8): 897. doi:10.1080/13621025.2018.1538319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS. 2015. Aantal Nederlanders Met Dubbele Nationaliteit Gestegen Naar 1,3 Miljoen. 4 August. Accessed 22 October 2018. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2015/32/aantal-nederlanders-met-dubbele-nationaliteit-gestegen-naar-1-3-miljoen
   Google Scholar
• CBS. 2016. Bevolking Naar Migratieachtergrond. 21 November. Accessed 22 October 2018. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/achtergrond/2016/47/bevolking-naar-migratieachtergrond
   Google Scholar
• CoE Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016. Letter to Dutch Ministers of the Interior and Kingdom Relations and Security and Justice. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. 2015. Sharpening Contradictions: Why al-Qaeda Attacked Satirists in Paris. 1 July. Accessed 22 October 2018. https://www.juancole.com/2015/01/sharpening-contradictions-satirists.html
   Google Scholar
• College voor de Rechten van de Mens. 2015. Advies: Conceptwetsvoorstel tot Wijziging van de Rijkswet op het Nederlanderschap in Verband met het Intrekken van het Nederlanderschap in het Belang van de Nationale Veiligheid. College voor de Rechten van de Mens.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. “Explanatory Report to thProtocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.” Explanatory Report.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe Treaty Office. 2017. Chart of Signature and Ratifications of Treaty 177 – Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 3 May. Accessed 23 October 2018. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/177/signatures?p_auth=lVSIhhvv
   Google Scholar
• D.H. and Others v The Czech Republic. 2006. App no 57325/00 (ECtHR, 7 February).
   Google Scholar
• D.H. and Others v The Czech Republic. 2007. App no 57325/00 (ECtHR [GC], 13 November).
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, G. R. 2016. Towards a Toolbox for Nationality Legislation. Maastricht: Nexus Legal.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, G. R., and O. Vonk. 2015b. “Jihad En Ontneming Van Nationaliteit – Nederlandse Plannen in Vergelijkend Perspectief.” In Pauline Kruiniger (Ed.), Jihad, Islam en Recht: Jihadisme en reacties vanuit het Nederlandse en Belgische Recht: 35.Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, G.-R., and O. Vonk. 2015a. “De Ontneming Van Het Nederlanderschap Wegens Jihadistische Activiteiten.” Tijschrift Voor Religie, Recht En Beleid.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, R. 2016. Intrekken Nederlanderschap Uitgereisde Jihadisten: Toetsing Aan Internationale Mensenrechten: Recht Op Een Nationaliteit, Discriminatieverboden En Rechtsbescherming. Weert: Celsus.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Constitution. 1814. Grondwet.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Criminal Code. 1881. Wetboek Van Strafrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministers of the Interior and Kingdom Relations and Security and Justice. 2016. “Response to the CoE Commissioner for Human Rights’ Letter of 2 November 2016.” 25 November.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice; National Coordinator Counterterrorism and Security; Minister of Social Affairs and Employment. 2014. “Actieprogramma Integrale Aanpak Jihadisme.”
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Nationality Act. 1984. Rijkswet Op Het Nederlanderschap.
   Google Scholar
• Eerste Kamer. 2017b. “Verslag Van De Vergadering Van 7 Februari 2017.” Parliamentary Report 2016/2017 nr. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Eerste Kamer. 2017a. “Verslag Van De Vergadering Van 31 Januari 2017.” Parliamentary Report 2016/2017 nr. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Esbrook, L. 2016. “Citizenship Unmoored: Expatriation as Counter-Terrorism Tool.” Journal of International Law 37 (3): 1273.
   Google Scholar
• European Convention on Nationality. 1997. ”
   Google Scholar
• French Civil Code. 1804. Code Civil.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, N. C., and A. A. Said. 2004. “Islam and the West: Narratives of Conflict and Conflict Transformation.” International Journal of Peace Studies 9: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gaygusuz v Austria. 1996. App no 17371/90 (ECtHR, 16 September).
   Google Scholar
• Georgia v Russia (I). 2014. App no 13255/07 (ECtHR, 3 July).
   Google Scholar
• Ghoumid et al. v France. 2016. App nos 52273/16, 52285/16, 52290/16, 52294/16, 52302/16 (ECtHR, 2016 September).
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, M. J. 2013. “Should Citiznehsip Be Conditional? the Ethics of Denationalisation.” The Journal of Politics 75 (3): 646. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabenwarter, C. 2014. European Convention on Human Rights: Commentary. Munich: CH Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, J. 2016. “De Wetsvoorstellen Ter Uitvoering Van Het Actieprogramma Integrale Aanpak Jihadisme.” Tijdschrift Voor Constitutioneel Recht.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, J. 2017. Jihadgangers Zijn Relatief Vaak Bekeerlingen; 45 Procent Is Van Marokkaanse Komaf. 5 July. Accessed 22 October 2018. https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/jihadgangers-zijn-relatief-vaak-bekeerlingen-45-procent-is-van-marokkaanse-komaf~bb147bf6/
   Google Scholar
• Hegghammer, T., and P. Nesser. 2015. “Assessing the Islamic State’s Commitment to Attacking the West.” Perspectives on Terrorism 9 (4): 14.
   Google Scholar
• Immigratie- en Naturalisatiedienst. 2017. “Intrekking Nederlanderschap.” Staatscourant nr. 52440. 10 March.
   Google Scholar
• Immigratie- en Naturalisatiedienst. 2018. Monitor naturalisatie en optie 2014-2017. Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid.
   Google Scholar
• Jessurun D'Oliveira, Hans Ulrich. 2016. “Nationaliteitsrecht Als Wapen in De Strijd Tegen De Jihad.” NJB 2014/1908.
   Google Scholar
• Jessurun D'Oliveira. Hans Ulrich. 2017. “Geen Directe Werking Europees Nationaliteitsverdrag? so What?” NJB 2017/98.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2016. “Terror and the Loss of Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 20 (6–7): 728. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1191435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouwenhoven, A. 2019. Minister Neemt Tegen Advies in Jihadisten Nationaliteit Af. 7 January. Accessed 18 January 2019. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/01/07/minister-neemt-tegen-advies-in-jihadisten-nationaliteit-af-a3128215
   Google Scholar
• Lavi, S. 2011. “Citizenship Revocation as Punishment: On the Modern Duties of Citizens and Their Criminal Breach.” University of Toronto – Jean-Philippe Julien 61 (4): 783. doi:10.3138/utlj.61.4.783.
   Google Scholar
• Liechtenstein v Guatemala (Nottebohm). 1955. ICJ 1 (ICJ).
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, A. 2014. “Citizenship Revocation, the Privilege to Have Rights and the Production of Aliens.” Queen’s Law Journal 40 (1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, N. 2015. Charlie Hebdo: The “Them and Us” Narrative Is a Dangerous Downward Spiral. 8 January. Accessed 22 October 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/08/charlie-hebdo-them-and-us-clash-of-civilisations
   Google Scholar
• McBridge, M. K. 2011. “The Logic of Terrorism: Existential Anxiety, the Search for Meaning, and Terrorist Ideologies.” Terrorism and Political Violence 23 (4): 560. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.575486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minister of Security and Justice. 2017. “Besluit Van De Minister Van Veiligheid En Justitie Van 2 Maart 2017, Nr. 2050307.” Besluit tot vaststelling van de lijst met organisaties de een bedreiging vormen voor de nationale veiligheid.
   Google Scholar
• Nachova and Others v Bulgaria. 2005. App nos 43577/98 and 43579/98 (ECtHR, 6 July).
   Google Scholar
• Nationaal Coordinator Terrorismebestrijding en Veiligheid. March 2018a. “Dreigingsbeeld Terrorisme Nederland 47.”
   Google Scholar
• Nationaal Coordinator Terrorismebestrijding en Veiligheid. September 2018b. Dreigingsbeeld Terrorisme Nederland 48.
   Google Scholar
• NPO Radio 1. 2017. Bijna 300 Passportent Ingenomen Van Jihadgangers. February 1. Accessed 24 October 2018. https://www.nporadio1.nl/achtergrond/2959-bijna-300-paspoorten-ingenomen-van-jihadgangers
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2019a. “Recommendation 2145.” Withdrawing Nationalit as a Measuree to Combat Terrorism: A Human Rights-Compatible Approach?
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2019b. “Resolution 2263.” Withdrawing Nationalit as a Measuree to Combat Terrorism: A Human Rights-Compatible Approach?
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan v Malta. 2016. App no 76136/12 (ECtHR, 21 June).
   Google Scholar
• S.A.S. v France. 2014. App no 43835/11 (ECtHR, 1 July).
   Google Scholar
• Schabas, W. 2016. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• SGR 17/6834 and 17/15049. 2018. (Rechtbank den Haag, 26 June).
   Google Scholar
• Soering v The United Kingdom. 1989. App no 14038/88 (ECtHR, 7 July).
   Google Scholar
• Stec and Others v The United Kingdom. 2006. App nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01 (ECtHR, 12 April).
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, P. 2016. “Denaturalisation and Conceptions of Citizenship in the ‘War on Terror’.” Citizenship Studies, 749.
   Google Scholar
• Trop v. Dulles. 1985. 356 US 86, 101 (USSC).
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. 2016. “Intrekken Nederlanderschap in Beland Nationale Veiligheid.” Report of Plenary Discussion 18 May 2016.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. 2018. Amicus Brief, United Nationals Human Rights.
   Google Scholar