The linguistic boundary problem

References

• Afsahi, A. 2020. “Disabled Lives in Deliberative Systems.” Political Theory 48 (6): 751–776. early view. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591720913093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrhenius, G. 2005. “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory.” In Democracy Unbound: Basic Explorations I, edited by G. Arrhenius and F. Tersman, 14–29. Stockholm: Filosofika Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Arrhenius, G. 2018. “The Democratic Boundary Problem Reconsidered.” Ethics, Politics and Society 1: 89–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.1.1.52.
   Google Scholar
• Arrhenius, G. 2019. “Democracy for the 21st Century: Research Questions.” In Social Science at the Crossroads, edited by B. Wittrock, Björn, and S. Randeria, 165–186. London: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2017. “Political Membership and Democratic Boundaries.” In The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, and M. Vink, 60–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R., ed. 2018. Democratic Inclusion: Rainer Bauböck in Dialogue. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergo, B. 2008. “What Levinas Can and Cannot Teach Us about Mediating Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 57–71. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, B. 2020. “The Language of Public Reason.” Journal of Social Philosophy. early view. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12365
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 1970. After the Revolution? New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, S. D. 2009. “In Space No One Can See You Waving Your Hands: Making Citizenship Meaningful to Deaf Worlds.” Citizenship Studies 13 (1): 31–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020802586719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargues, É., E. Winter, and M. J. Gibney, eds. 2020. When States Take Rights Back Citizenship Revocation and Its Discontents. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fargues, E., E. Winter & M. Gibney. 2019. “When States Take Rights Back: Citizenship Revocation and Its Discontents.” Special issue of Citizenship Studies 23 (4): 295–405.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. 2000. “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4): 371–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00371.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzola, M., B.-A. Wickström, and M. Fettes 2020. “Towards an Index of Linguistic Justice.” Working Paper no. 20-1, Research Group “Economics and Language” (REAL). Ulster University.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998. “Some Further Clarifications on the Concept of Communicative Rationality.” In On the Pragmatics of Communication, edited by M. Cooke, 307–342. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 15–43. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., and G. M. Nielsen, eds. 2008. Acts of Citizenship. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. 2019. “’Deaf Spectators’ and Democratic Elitism: Participation, Democracy and Disability.” The Pluralist 14 (2): 30–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.5406/pluralist.14.2.0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmayer, L. 2008. “Empathy and Alterity in Cultural Psychiatry.” Ethos 36 (4): 457–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2008.00027.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumm, -J.-J. 2012. “Multilingualism, Heterogeneity and the Monolingual Policies of the Linguistic Integration of Migrants.” In Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by M. Messer, R. Schroeder, and R. Wodak, 43–54. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W., and S. Donaldson. 2016. “Locating Animals in Political Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 11 (11): 692–701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, J. 2016. “Conceptually Mapping the European Union: A Demoi-cratic Analysis.” Journal of European Integration 38 (1): 61–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2015.1081186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, M., and B. Zacka. 2019. “Letter: Political Theory in an Ethnographic Key.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 1066–1070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000431.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, R. S. 2011. “Les affres de l’accouchement.” In Bariolée, translated by I. Mavrodin, 54. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, R. F., S. A. Ercan, and H. Asenbaum. 2020. “More than Words: A Multidimensional Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 003232172095056. early view. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720950561.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, T. 2015. “Language and Citizenship: Broadening the Agenda.” Journal of Language and Politics 14 (3): 319–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.3.01mil.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T., S. Bauer, M. Carlson, A. Spehar, and K. von Brömssen. 2021. “Citizenship as Status, Habitus and Acts: Language Requirements and Civic Orientation in Sweden.” Citizenship Studies 25 (6): 756–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2020. “Reconceiving the Democratic Boundary Problem.” Philosophy Compass 15 (11): 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, L., and Y. Peled. 2018. Normative Language Policy: Ethics, Politics, Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, A. 2016. Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, A. I. 2019. “Communicating Citizenship.” Annual Review of Anthropology 48 (1): 77–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled, Y. 2018a. “Towards an Adaptive Approach to Linguistic Justice: Three Paradoxes.” In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice: Economic, Philosophical and Sociolinguistic Approaches, edited by M. Gazzola, T. Templin, and B.-A. Wickström, 173–188. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, Y. 2018b. “Language Barriers and Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare Settings.” Bioethics 32 (6): 360–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled, Y. 2020. “The Idea of Language Ethics as a Field of Inquiry.” In Language Ethics, edited by Y. Peled and D. Weinstock, 3-30. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, Y. 2021. “Komplexitätsbasierte Normative Ordnungen – Demokratische Verzweiflung Und Adaptive Hoffnung” (“complexity-based Normative Orders: Democratic Despair and Adaptive Hope”).” In Komplexität in Wissenschaft, Kultur und Gesellschaft, edited by H. Schwalbe and M. Lutz-Bachmann. Freiburg i.Br.: Karl Alber.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, Y., and M. Bonotti. 2016. “Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 798–811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled, Y., and M. Bonotti. 2019. “Sound Reasoning: Why Accent Bias Matters for Democratic Theory.” Journal of Politics 81 (2): 411–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/701725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printschitz, B. 2017. “All a Question of the ‘Right’ Capital? Subjectification – The Hidden Mechanism behind Language Tests for Residence Permit in Austria.” In The Linguistic Integration of Adult Migrants/L’intégration Linguistique Des Migrants Adultes, edited by J.-C. Beacco, H.-J. Krumm, D. Little, and P. Thalgott, 241–248, Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Puumala, E., and R. Shindo. 2021. “Introduction: Exploring the Links between Language, Everyday Citizenship, and Community.” Citizenship Studies 25 (6): 739–755.
   Google Scholar
• Raisio, H., K. Valkama, and E. Peltola. 2014. “Disability and Deliberative Democracy: Towards Involving the Whole Human Spectrum in Public Deliberation.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16 (1): 77–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2013.781957.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, G. 2020. “Abandoning Endangered Languages: Ethical Loneliness, Language Oppression, and Social Justice.” American Anthropologist 122 (1): 164–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2015. “Democratic Theory and the Challenge of Linguistic Diversity.” In Language Policy and Political Theory: Building Bridges, Assessing Breaches, edited by T. Ricento, Y. Peled, and P. Ives, 101–118. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scudder, M. F. 2020. “The Ideal of Uptake in Democratic Deliberation.” Political Studies 68 (2): 504–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719858270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senghas, R. J., and L. Monaghan. 2002. “Signs of Their Time: Deaf Communities and the Culture of Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1): 66–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.020402.101302.
   Google Scholar
• Sleat, M. 2013. “Hope and Disappointment in Politics.” Contemporary Politics 19 (2): 131–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.785826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strani, K. 2014. “The Impact of Socio-Political Change on Public Sphere Theory: Exploring the Relevance of Communicative Rationality.” International Journal of Cross-Cultural Studies and Environmental Communication 3 (1): 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Van Asseldonk, M. 2021. “‘Beyond Civil Bounds’: The Demos, Political Agency, Subjectivation and Democracy’s Boundary Problem.” Constellations. early view.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P. 2011. Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, F. 1983. “Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem.” In Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy, edited by J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman, 13–47. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2008. “Can an Act of Citizenship Be Creative?” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 44–56. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zacka, B., B. Ackerly, J. Elster, S. G. Allen, H. Iqtidar, M. Longo, and P. Sagar. 2021. “Critical Exchange: Political Theory with an Ethnographic Sensibility.” Contemporary Political Theory. early view 20 : 385–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar