Emerging digital citizenship regimes: Pandemic, algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan, and stateless citizenships

References

• Agnew, J. 2017. “The Tragedy of the Nation-state.” Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (4): 347–350. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1357257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aho, B., and R. Duffield. 2020. “Beyond Surveillance Capitalism: Privacy, Regulation and Big Data in Europe and China.” Economy and Society 49 (2): 187–212. doi:10.1080/03085147.2019.1690275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saqaf, W., and N. Seidler. 2017. “Blockchain Technology for Social Impact: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead.” Journal of Cyber Policy 2 (3): 338–354. doi:10.1080/23738871.2017.1400084.
   Google Scholar
• ALI (Ada Lovelace Institute), ANI (AI Now Institute), and OGP (Open Government Partnership. 2021. Algorithmic Accountability for Public Sector: Learning from the First Wave of Policy Implementation. Accessed 3 December 2021. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/documents/algorithmic-accountability-public-sector/
   Google Scholar
• ALI (Ada Lovelace Institute). 2021a. Checkpoints for Vaccine Passports: Requirements for Governments and Developers. London: Ada Lovelace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ALI (Ada Lovelace Institute). 2021b. What Place Should COVID-19 Vaccines Passports Have in Society? London: Ada Lovelace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ammann, O. 2020. “Passports for Sale: How (Un)meritocratic are Citizenship by Investment Programmes?” European Journal of Migration and Law 22 (3): 309–337. doi:10.1163/15718166-12340078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1949. “The Rights of Man: What are They?” Modern Review 3 (26): 4–37.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, J.-T., and D. Stjepanović. 2019. “Introduction: The Rescaling of Territory and Citizenship in Europe.” Ethnopolitics 1–8. doi:10.1080/17449057.2019.1585087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzori, M. 2017. “Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?” Journal of Governance and Regulation 6 (1): 45–62. doi:10.22495/jgr_v6_i1_p5.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera, F., and I.-R. Jones. 2020. The Foundational Economy and Citizenship: Comparative Perspectives on Civil Repair. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2019. “A Multilevel Theory of Democratic Secession.” Ethnopolitics 18 (3): 227–246. doi:10.1080/17449057.2019.1585088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, S. 2017. Liquid Nationalism and State Partitions in Europe. Chentelham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. 2020. “Global Nationalism in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Nationalities Paper 1–13. Accessed 3 December 2021. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/article/global-nationalism-in-times-of-the-covid19-pandemic/3A7F44AFDD6AC117AE05160F95738ED4
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., E. Isin, and E. Ruppert. 2019. Data Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birnie, R., and R. Bauböck. 2020. “Introduction: Expulsion and Citizenship in the 21st Century.” Citizenship Studies 24 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1080/13621025.2020.1733260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2009. “Open Questions on State Rescaling.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2 (1): 123–139. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsp002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, J., and J. Pierson. 2021. “The Right to the City and Data Protection for Developing Citizen-centric Digital Cities.” Information, Communication & Society 24 (6): 797–812. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1909095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridle, J. 2016. “Algorithmic Citizenship, Digital Statelessness.” GeoHumanities 2 (2): 377–381. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2016.1237858.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., J. Davidovic, and A. Hasan. 2021. “The Algorithm Audit: Scoring the Algorithms that Score Us.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1177/2053951720983865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burki, T. 2021. “Equitable Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 21 (1): 33–34. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30949-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I., and E. Almirall. 2020. “Data Ecosystems for Protecting European Citizens’ Digital Rights.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 14 (2): 133–147. doi:10.1108/TG-03-2020-0047.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I., M. Pérez-Batlle, and J. Batlle-Montserrat. 2021. “People-centered Smart Cities: An Exploratory Action Research on the Cities’ Coalition for Digital Rights.” Journal of Urban Affairs 1–26. doi:10.1080/07352166.2021.1994861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2015. “Benchmarking Future City-regions beyond Nation-states.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 351–362. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1046908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2018a. “‘Algorithmic Nations’: Seeing like a City-regional and Techno-political Conceptual Assemblage.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 5 (1): 267–289. doi:10.1080/21681376.2018.1507754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2018b. “(Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-makers? the Case Study of Barcelona.” Sustainability 10 (9): 3252. doi:10.3390/su10093252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2018c. “Metropolitanising Small European Stateless City-regionalised Nations.” Space and Polity 22 (3): 342–361. doi:10.1080/13562576.2018.1555958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2019. “Catalonia Rescaling Spain: Is It Feasible to Accommodate Its “Stateless Citizenship”?” Regional Science Policy & Practice 11 (5): 805–820. doi:10.1111/rsp3.12240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2020b. “Platform and Data Co-operatives Amidst European Pandemic Citizenship.” Sustainability 12 (20): 8309. doi:10.3390/su12208309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2020c. “Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework.” Smart Cities 3 (4): 1145–1172. doi:10.3390/smartcities3040057.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2021a. Smart City Citizenship. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Elsevier Science Publishing Co .
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2021b. Pandemic Citizenship Amidst Stateless Algorithmic Nations: Digital Rights and Technological Sovereignty at Stake. Brussels: Coppieters Foundation. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.36196.19849/3.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2021c. “Data Co-operatives through Data Sovereignty.” Smart Cities 4 (3): 1158–1172. doi:10.3390/smartcities4030062. Special Issue ‘ Feature Papers for Smart Cities.’
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2021d. “The Right to Have Digital Rights in Smart Cities.” Sustainability 13 (20): 11438. doi:10.3390/su132011438. Special Issue ‘ Social Innovation in Sustainable Urban Development.’
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2020a. “Emerging Citizenship Regimes and Rescaling (European) Nation-States: Algorithmic, Liquid, Metropolitan and Stateless Citizenship Ideal Types.” In Handbook on the Changing Geographies of the State: New Spaces of Geopolitics, edited by S. Moisio, N. Koch, A. E. G. Jonas, C. Lizotte, and J. Luukkonen, 368–383. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781788978057.00048.
   Google Scholar
• CCDR (Cities’ Coalition for Digital Rights). 2019. “Declaration of Cities Coalition for Digital Rights.” https://citiesfordigitalrights.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cetrà, D., and M. Harvey. 2018. “Explaining Accommodation and Resistance to Demands for Independence Referendums in the UK and Spain.” Nations and Nationalism. doi:10.1111/nana.12417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. 2011. “A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control.” Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6): 164–181. doi:10.1177/0263276411424420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. 2017. We are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., and M. Georgiou. 2022. The Digital Border: Migration, Technology, Power. NYC: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and U. A. Mejias. 2019a. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and U. A. Mejias. 2019b. “Making Data Colonialism Liveable: How Might Data’s Social Order Be Regulated?” Internet Policy Review 8 (2). doi:10.14763/2019.2.1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2020. “New States of Emergency: Normalizing Techno-surveillance in the Time of COVID-19.” Global Affairs 1–10. doi:10.1080/23340460.2020.1825108.
   Google Scholar
• CU (Cardiff University). 2018. Digital Technologies and Future Opportunities for the Foundational Economy in Wales. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Daskal, E. 2018. “Let’s Be Careful Out There …: How Digital Rights Advocates Educate Citizens in the Digital Age.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (2): 241–256. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Filippi, M. M., W. Reijers, and W. Reijers. 2020. “Blockchain as a Confidence Machine: The Problme of Trust & Challenge of Governance.” Technology in Society 62 (101284): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284.
   Google Scholar
• De Filippi, P., and X. Lavayssiére. 2020. Blockchain Technology: Toward a Decentralized Governance of Digital Platforms? the Great Awakening: New Modes of Life Amidst Capitalist Ruins. Goleta: Punctum Book.
   Google Scholar
• de Koning, A., R. Jaffe, and M. Koster. 2015. “Citizenship Agendas in and beyond the Nation-state: (En)countering Framings of the Good Citizen.” Citizenship Studies 19 (2): 121–127. doi:10.1080/13621025.2015.1005940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., J. Redden, A. Hintz, and H. Warne. 2019. “The Golden View: Data-driven Governance in the Scoring Society.” Internet Policy Review 8 (2): 2. doi:10.14763/2019.2.1413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desforges, L., R. Jones, and M. Woods. 2005. “New Geographies of Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 9 (5): 439–451. doi:10.1080/13621020500301213.
   Google Scholar
• Dijstelbloem, H., and D. Broeders. 2015. “Border Surveillance, Mobility Management and the Shaping of Non-publics in Europe.” European Journal of Social Theory 18 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1177/1368431014534353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbrava, C. 2017. “Citizenship and Technology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, edited by A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, and M. Vink, 767–788. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer-Witheford, N., M. Kjosen, and J. Steinhoff. 2019. Inhuman Power Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• e-Estonia. 2016. “Country as a Service: Estonia’s New Model.” https://e-Estonia.com/country-as-a-service-estonias-new-model/
   Google Scholar
• e-Residency 2.0. 2018. White Paper. Recommendations for Marking Estonia’s Ground-breaking e-Residency Initiative More Beneficial to Everyone Who Is Part of Our Digital Nation. Tallinn: e-Residency 2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, A., L. Basile, N. Franco-Guillén, and E. Szocsik. 2021. “The Framing Territorial Demands (Fraterr) Dataset: A Novel Approach to Conceptualizing and Measuring Regionalist Actors’ Territorial Strategies.” Regional & Federal Studies 1–16. doi:10.1080/13597566.2021.1964481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, D. Supply Chain Regulation in the Service of Geopolitics: What Is Happening in Semiconductors? CIGI Papers No. 256 – August 2021. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• FE (Foundational Economy). 2020. “2020 Manifesto for the Foundational Economy.” https://foundationaleconomy.com
   Google Scholar
• FEC (Foundational Economy Collective). 2020. What Comes after the Pandemic? A Ten-Point Platform for Foundational Renewal. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2020. “The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU.” Philosophy & Technology 33 (3): 369–378. doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003. ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-76. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. 2021. “Ordinary Citizenship.” British Journal of Sociology 72 (2): 154–173. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, S., and F. de Haro. 2020. “Buying Citizenship? Chinese Golden Visa Migrants in Portugal.” International Migration 58 (3): 58–72. doi:10.1111/imig.12621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gekker, A., and S. Hind. 2019. “Infrastructural Surveillance.” New Media & Society 22 (8): 1414–1436. doi:10.1177/1461444819879426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. N. 2018. 21 Lessons for the Century. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., C. Jefferey, and D. Wincott. 2013. Citizenship after the Nation-state: Regionalism, Nationalism and Public Attitudes in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., and R. W. Jones. 2021. Englishness: The Political Force Transforming Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., L. Dencik, and K. Wahl-Jorgensen. 2017. “Digital Citizenship and Surveillance Society.” International Journal of Communications 11: 731–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, P., M. Braun, M. Tretter, and P. Dabrock. 2021. “Data Sovereignty: A Review.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 2053951720982012. doi:10.1177/2053951720982012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, S. O., A. Franklin, and D. Roep. 2020. “The Political Imaginaries of Blockchain Projects: Discerning the Expressions of an Emerging Ecosystem.” Sustainability Science. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00786-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E., and E. Ruppert. 2015. Being Digital Citizens. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E., and E. Ruppert. 2020. “The Birth of Sensory Power: How a Pandemic Made It Visible?” Big Data & Society 7 (2): 1–15. doi:10.1177/2053951720969208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E. 2012. “Citizens without Nations.” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 30 (3): 450–467. doi:10.1068/d19210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G., and D. Wilson. 2018. “The Nation-state and the City: Introduction to a Debate.” Urban Geography 1–3. doi:10.1080/02723638.2018.1461991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, M. S. 2018. “Blockchain Government - a Next Form of Infrastructure for the Twenty-first Century.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 4 (7): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s40852-018-0086-3.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, K., and O. Puukko. 2020. “Four Discourses of Digital Rights: Promises and Problems of Rights-based Politics.” Journal of Information Policy 10 (2020): 304–328. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.0304.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B., and J. Bradley. 2013. The Metropolitan Revolution: How Cities and Metros are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, I. T., R. Weintraub, L.-G. Bekker, and A. M. Brandt. 2021. “From Vaccine Nationalism to Vaccine Equity — Finding a Path Forward.” New England Journal of Medicine 384 (14): 1281–1283. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2103614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 2013. Rescaling the European State: The Making of Territory and the Rise of the Meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, P. 2016. Connectography: Mapping the Global Network Revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2020. “Civil Liberties or Public Health, or Civil Liberties and Public Health? Using Surveillance Technologies to Tackle the Spread of COVID-19.” Space & Polity 24 (3): 362–381. doi:10.1080/13562575.2020.1770587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, M. 2016. “The Borders, They are A-changin’! the Emergence of Socio-digital Borders in the EU.” Internet Policy Review 5 (1): 1. doi:10.14763/2016.1.403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostka, G., and L. Antoine. 2020. “Fostering Model Citizenship: Behavioral Responses to China’s Emerging Social Credit Systems.” Policy & Internet 12 (3): 256–289. doi:10.1002/poi3.213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotka, T., C. I. Vargas Alvarez Del Castillo, and K. Korjus. 2015. Estonian e-Residency: Redefining the Nation-state in the Digital Era. Working Paper Series: Oxford. Cyber Studies Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., and J. Taylor. 2016. Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Australia: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Latonero, M., and P. Kift. 2018. “On Digital Passages and Borders: Refugees and the New Infrastructure for Movement and Control.” Social Media + Society 4 (1): 1. doi:10.1177/2056305118764432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, S. 2015. Data-ism: The Revolution Transforming Decision Making, Consumer Behavior, and Almost Everything Else. NYC: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Männiste, M., and A. Masso. 2020. “Three Drops of Blood for the Devil: Data Pioneers as Intermediaries of Algorithmic Governance Ideals.” Mediální Studia/Media Studies 14 (1): 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Masso, A., and T. Kasapoglu. 2020. “Understanding Power Positions in a New Digital Landscape: Perceptions of Syrian Refugees and Data Experts on Relocation Algorithm.” Information, Communication & Society 23 (8): 1203–1219. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1739731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, K. 2014. “Human Rights for the Digital Age.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 29 (1): 2–18. doi:10.1080/08900523.2014.863124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavelli, L. 2018. “Citizenship for Sale and the Neoliberal Political Economy of Belonging.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (3): 482–493. doi:10.1093/isq/sqy004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCosker, A., S. Vivienne, and A. Johns. 2016. Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest and Culture. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., A. E. G. Jonas, N. Koch, C. Lizotte, and J. Luukkonen. 2020. Handbook on the Changing Geographies of the State: New Spaces of Geopolitics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Cherry, N., A. Pike, and J. Tomaney. 2021. “City-regional and Metropolitan Governance.” In A Research Agenda for Regional and Local Government, edited by M. Callanan, and J. Loughlin, 63–77. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham .
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2019. “Digital Socialism?” In New Left Review, 116/117.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., C. J. Tolbert, and R. S. McNeal. 2007. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulle, E. D., and I. Serrano. 2018. “Between a Principled and a Consequentialist Logic: Theory and Practice of Secession in Catalonia and Scotland.” Nations and Nationalism 1–22. doi:10.1111/nana.12412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, G. F. 2013. “The Future of Non‐metropolitan Areas.” Regional Science Policy & Practice 5 (2): 219–224. doi:10.1111/rsp3.12005.
   Google Scholar
• NAW (National Assembly for Wales). 2016. Wales and the EU: What Does the Vote to Leave the EU Mean for Wales? Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Newlands, G., C. Lutz, A. Tamò-Larrieux, E. Fosch Villaronga, R. Harasgama, and G. Scheitlin. 2020. “Innovation under Pressure: Implications for Data Privacy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Big Data & Society 7 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951720976680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, J. 2017. “Identity, Rights and Surveillance in an Era of Transforming Citizenship.” Citizenship Studies 1–8. doi:10.1080/13621025.2017.1406456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyers, P. 2006. “The Accidental Citizen: Acts of Sovereignty and (Un)making Citizenship.” Economy and Society 35 (1): 22–41. doi:10.1080/03085140500465824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmae, K. 1995. The End of the Nation-State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: Simon and Schuster .
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L., and J. Sefton-Green. 2021. “Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference?” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 10 (1): 15–27. doi:10.7821/NAER.2021.1.616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., and J. Humphry. 2019. “Exclusion by Design: Intersections of Social, Digital and Data Exclusion.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (7): 934–953. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, A., and T. Hardjono. 2020. Data Cooperatives. Massachussets: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Reijers, W., F. O’Brolcháin, and P. Haynes. 2016. “Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories.” Ledger 1: 134–151. doi:10.5915/LEDGER.2016.62.
   Google Scholar
• RF (Radical Federalism). 2021. We, the People: The Case for Radical Federalism. Cardiff: Radical Federalism.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places that Don’t Matter (And What to Do about It).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadiq, K. 2008. Paper Citizens: How Illegal Immigrants Acquire Citizenship in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2002. “Towards Post-National and Denationalized Citizenship.” In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, edited by E. F. Isin and B. S. Turner, 277–291. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T., and I. Calzada. 2021. “Data Cooperatives for Pandemic Times.” Public Seminar. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.12320.51200/1.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. 2016. Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Schou, J., and M. Hjelholt. 2018. “Digital State Spaces: State Rescaling and Advanced Digitalization.” Territory, Politics, Governance 1–17. doi:10.1080/21622671.2018.1532809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shachar, A. 2018. “The Marketization of Citizenship in an Age of Restrictionism.” Ethics & International Affairs 32 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silm, S., V. Mooses, A. Puura, A. Masso, A. Tominga, and E. Saluveer. 2021. “The Relationship between Ethno-linguistic Composition of Social Networks and Activity Space: A Study Using Mobile Phone Data.” Social Inclusion 9 (2): 192–207. doi:10.17645/si.v9i2.3839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucke, M. E. 2018. “Should We Be Concerned about Data-opolies?” In Georgetown Law Technology Review. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/should-we-be-concerned-about-data-opolies/GLTR-07-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Tammpuu, P., and A. Masso. 2018. “‘Welcome to the Virtual State’: Estonian E-residency and the Digitalised State as a Commodity.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 21 (5): 543–560. doi:10.1177/1367549417751148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammpuu, P., and A. Masso. 2019. “Transnational Digital Identity as an Instrument for Global Digital Citizenship: The Case of Estonia’s e-Residency.” Information Systems Frontiers 21 (3): 621–634. doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09908-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 2017. “Contemporary Citizenship: Four Types.” Journal of Citizenship and Globalisation Studies 1 (1): 10–23. doi:10.1515/jcgs-2017-0002.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208. doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod, D. N., and S. R. S. Prabaharan. 2020. “Data Science and the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving the Fast Diagnosis of COVID-19.” Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals 140: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. 2021. “From Crisis to Nationalism? the Conditioned Effects of the COVID-19 Crisis on Neo-nationalism in Europe.” Chinese Political Science Review 6 (1): 20–39. doi:10.1007/s41111-020-00169-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. 2020. “City-state Britain: A Counter-narrative to ‘Brexit’.” Geopolitics 1–31. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1856087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WG (Welsh Government). 2021. Digital Strategy for Wales: How We Will Use Digital, Data and Technology to Improve the Lives of People in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. G. 2021. The Centenary Edition Raymond Williams: Who Speaks for Wales? Nation, Culture, Identity. Swansea: University of Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyn Jones, R., and J. Larner. 2020. “Progressive Home Rule?”. IPPR Progressive Review 27 (3): 235–245. doi:10.1111/newe.12221.
   Google Scholar
• YesCymru. 2021. Independence in Your Pocket. Cardiff: Yes Cymru.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar