The governance of vulnerable migrants: procedure, resources and affect in asylum reception

References

• Ahimbisibwe, F. 2019. “Ugandan and the Refugee Problem: Challenges and Opportunities.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 13 (5): 62–72. doi:10.5897/AJPSIR2018.1101.
   Google Scholar
• Akello, V. 2009. “Uganda’s Progressive Refugee Act Becomes Operational.” UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2009/6/4a3f9e076/ugandas-progressive-refugee-act-becomes-operational.html Accessed 14 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Anders, G. 2010. In the Shadow of Good Governance: An Ethnography of Civil Service Reform in Africa. London: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Andreetta, S. 2019. “Writing for Different Audiences Social Workers, Irregular Migrants and Fragmented Statehood in Belgian Welfare Bureaucracies.” Journal of Legal Anthropology 3 (2): 91–110. doi:10.3167/jla.2019.030206.
   Google Scholar
• Ayata, B. 2019. “Affective Citizenship.” In Affective Societies. Key Concepts, edited by J. Slaby and C. von Scheve, 330–339. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgärtel, M. 2020. “Facing the Challenge of Migratory Vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 38 (1): 12–29. doi:10.1177/0924051919898127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierschenk, T. 2014. “Sedimentation, Fragmentation and Normative Double-Binds in (West) African Public Services.” In States at Work, edited by B. Thomas and O. de Sardan Jean-Pierre, 221–249. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bierschenk, T., and Olivier de Sardan J. P., eds. 2014. States at Work. Dynamics of African Bureaucracies. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bierschenk, T., and Olivier de Sardan, J.P. 2019. “How to Study Bureaucracies Ethnographically?” Critique of Anthropology 39 (2): 243–257. doi:10.1177/0308275X19842918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundo, G., and P.-Y. Le Meur, eds. 2009. The Governance of Daily Life in Africa: Ethnographic Explorations of Public and Collective Services. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Borjas, G. J. 1999. “Immigration and Welfare Magnets.” Journal of Labor Economics 17 (4): 607–637. doi:10.1086/209933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrelli, L. M., and A. Lindberg. 2018. “The Creativity of Coping: Alternative Tales of Moral Dilemmas among Migration Control Officers.” International Journal of Migration and Border Studies 4 (3): 163–178. doi:10.1504/IJMBS.2018.093876.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., A. Z. Huq, J. Jackson, and B. Roberts. 2014. “What Price Fairness When Security Is at Stake? Police Legitimacy in South Africa.” Regulation and Governance 8 (2): 246–268. doi:10.1111/rego.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabot, H. 2012. “The Governance of Things: Documenting Limbo in the Greek Asylum Procedure.” Political and Legal Anthropology Review 35 (1): 11–29. doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2012.01177.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, G. 2020. “Discretion as Ethical Practice.” In Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom, edited by T. Evans and P. Hupe, 393–409. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Herdt, T., and Olivier de Sardan, J. P. 2015. Real Governance and Practical Norms in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Game of Rules. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Herdt, T., and K. Titeca. 2016. “Governance with Empty Pockets: The Education Sector in the Democratic Republic of Congo.” Development and Change 47 (3): 472–494. doi:10.1111/dech.12235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, V. 2010. The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Eule, T., L. M. Borrelli, A. Lindberg, and A. Wyss. 2019. Migrants before the Law: Contested Migration Control in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eule, T. G., D. Loher, and A. Wyss. 2017. “Contested Control at the Margins of the State.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (16): 2717–2729. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Council on Refugees and Exiles. 2017. “The Concept of Vulnerability in European Asylum Procedures.” Asylum Information Database. Accessed 4 March 2022 https://www.refworld.org/docid/59d227154.html
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2010. Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., and P. Hulpe. 2020. Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, A. M. 2008. “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition.” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 20 (1): 8–40. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6993
   Google Scholar
• Fortier, A.-M. 2010. “Proximity by Design? Affective Citizenship and the Management of Unease.” Citizenship Studies 14 (1): 17–30. doi:10.1080/13621020903466258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frésia, M. 2009. “Une Elite Transnationale: La Fabrique d’une Identité Professionnelle chez les Fonctionnaires du Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies aux Réfugiés.” Revue Européenne de Migrations Internationales 25 (3): 167–190. doi:10.4000/remi.4999.
   Google Scholar
• Gabarro, C. 2012. “Les Demandeurs de l’Aide Médicale d’État Pris entre Productivisme et Gestion Spécifique.” Revue Européenne de Migrations Internationales 28 (2): 35–56. doi:10.4000/remi.5870.
   Google Scholar
• Grear, A. 2007. “Challenging Corporate Humanity: Legal Embodiement and Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 7 (3): 511–543. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngm013.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffré, Y., and J.P. Olivier de Sardan (eds.). 2003. Une Médecine Inhospitalière. Les Difficiles Relations entre Soignants et Soignés dans Cinq Capitales d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Paris: Karthala.
   Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., and L. Trummers. 2018. “Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2): 226–238. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalm, S. 2019. “Affective Naturalization: Practices of Citizenship Conferment.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 44 (2–4): 138–154. doi:10.1177/0304375419847385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszczkowski, M., and M. Reeves. 2018. Affective States: Entanglements, Suspensions, Suspicions. London, New-York: Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne Delville, P. 2017. “Pour une Socio-Anthropologie de l’Action Publique dans les Pays ‘Sous Régime d’Aide’.” Anthropologie & développement 45 (45): 33–64. doi:10.4000/anthropodev.542.
   Google Scholar
• Leboeuf, L. 2021. “Humanitarianism and Juridification at Play: ‘Vulnerability’ as an Emerging Legal and Bureaucratic Concept in the Field of Asylum and Migration.” Vulner Research Report 1. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5722934.
   Google Scholar
• Lentz, C. 2014. “‘I Take an Oath to the State, Not the Government’: Career Trajectories and Professional Ethics of Ghanaian Public Servants.” In States at Work, Dynamics of African Bureaucracies, edited by T. Bierschenk and J.P. Olivier de Sardan, 175–204. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nakueira, S. 2021. “Protecting Vulnerable Refugees: An Empirical Examination of the Implementation Practises of Aid Workers and State Actors in Uganda.” Vulner Research Report 1. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5518521.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. 2010. “Développement, Modes de Gouvernance et Normes Pratiques (une Approche Socio-Anthropologique).” Revue canadienne d’études du développement 31 (1–2): 5–20. doi:10.1080/02255189.2010.9669327.
   Google Scholar
• Oumarou, H. 2014. “‘We Make Do and Keep Going!’ Inventive Practices of Ordered Informality in the Functioning of the District Courts in Niamey and Zinder (Niger).” In States at Work, edited by T. Bierschenk and J.-P. O. de Sardan, 145–175. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Perna, R. 2019. “Bound between Care and Control: Institutional Contradictions and Daily Practices of Healthcare for Migrants in an Irregular Situation in Italy.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (12): 2103–2122. doi:10.1080/01419870.2018.1533645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik, K. B. 2011. “Blurring Boundaries: Refugee Resettlement in Kampala—Between the Formal, the Informal, and the Illegal.” PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34 (1): 11–32. doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01136.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroléa, S., F. Raimondo, and Z. Crine. 2021. “Exploring Vulnerability‘s Challenges and Pitfalls in Belgian Ayslum System: Research Report on the Legal and Policy Framework and Implementing Practices in Belgium.” VULNER Research Report 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5508769.
   Google Scholar
• Sözer, H. 2019. “Categories that Blind Us, Categories that Bind Them: The Deployment of Vulnerability Notion for Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (3): 2775–2803. doi:10.1093/jrs/fez020/5396704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spire, A. 2008. Accueillir ou Reconduire. Enquête sur les Guichets de l’Immigration. Paris: Raisons d’agir.
   Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., and T. Tyler. 2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.” Law and Society Review 37 (3): 513–548. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titeca, K., and R. Flynn. 2014. “‘Hybrid Governance’, Legitimacy, and (Il)legality in the Informal Cross-Border Trade in Panyimur, Northwest Uganda.” African Studies Review 57 (1): 71–91. doi:10.1017/asr.2014.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virokannas, E., L. Suvi, and K. Marjo. 2018. “The Contested Concept of Vulnerability – A Literature Review.” European Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden, E. R., and J. S. McLean. 2017. “Procedural Justice and Management Accountability.” In Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy, edited by E. W. Robert and J. M. Sarah, 149–177. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar