Some effects of tool geometric features on friction stir weld response parameters

References

• Dawes C, Thomas W. Development of improved tool designs for friction stir welding of aluminium. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Friction Stir Welding; 1999. Thousand Oaks (CA). p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes C, Threadgill P, Spurgin E, et al. Development of the new friction stir technique for welding aluminum phase II. Cambridge: TWI Member Report; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas W. Friction stir welding-recent developments. Materials Science Forum; 2003: Trans Tech Pubication.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, et al. Friction stir butt welding international patent application no PCT/GB92/02203. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas WM. Friction stir welding and related friction process characteristics. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on ‘Joints in aluminium–INALCO; 1998, TWI, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas WM, Johnson KI, Wiesner CS. Friction stir welding–recent developments in tool and process technologies. Adv Eng Mater. 2003;5(7):485–490. doi: 10.1002/adem.200300355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler R, Lomolino S, Dos Santos J, et al., editors. A study on material flow in FSW of AA 2024-T351 and AA 6056-T4 alloys. 5th International FSW Symposium; Metz, France. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda R, Bingert J, Colligan K. Development of grain structure during friction stir welding. Scr Mater. 2004;51(3):243–248. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra RS, Ma Z. Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2005;50(1):1–78. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colligan K. Material flow behavior during friction welding of aluminum. Weld J. 1999;75(7):229s–237s.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider J, Nunes A. Characterization of plastic flow and resulting microtextures in a friction stir weld. Metall Mater Trans B. 2004;35(4):777–783. doi: 10.1007/s11663-004-0018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y-h, Lin S-b, Wu L, et al. The influence of pin geometry on bonding and mechanical properties in friction stir weld 2014 Al alloy. Mater Lett. 2005;59(23):2948–2952. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elangovan K, Balasubramanian V. Influences of pin profile and rotational speed of the tool on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007;459(1):7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorrain O, Favier V, Zahrouni H, et al. Understanding the material flow path of friction stir welding process using unthreaded tools. J Mater Process Technol. 2010;210(4):603–609. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud E, Takahashi M, Shibayanagi T, et al. Effect of friction stir processing tool probe on fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2009;14(5):413–425. doi: 10.1179/136217109X406974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Liu J, Xu KW, et al., editors. The influence of the stirrer’s shape and process parameter on friction stir welded MB3 magnesium joining. Materials Science Forum; 2005: Trans Tech Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Chen D, Bhole S, et al. Tensile properties of a friction stir welded magnesium alloy: effect of pin tool thread orientation and weld pitch. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527(21):6064–6075. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer S, Yeni Q. Influence of tool geometry on microstructure and mechanical properties of a friction stir welded 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Test. 2009;51(11-12):788–793. doi: 10.3139/120.110096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aissani M, Gachi S, Boubenider F, et al. Design and optimization of friction stir welding tool. Mater Manuf Process. 2010;25(11):1199–1205. doi: 10.1080/10426910903536733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattingh D, Blignault C, Van Niekerk T, et al. Characterization of the influences of FSW tool geometry on welding forces and weld tensile strength using an instrumented tool. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;203(1):46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidi Aval H, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi A, et al. Effect of tool geometry on mechanical and microstructural behaviours in dissimilar friction stir welding of AA 5086–AA 6061. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2011;16(7):597–604. doi: 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii H, Cui L, Maeda M, et al. Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;419(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanivel R, Mathews PK, Murugan N, et al. Effect of tool rotational speed and pin profile on microstructure and tensile strength of dissimilar friction stir welded AA5083-H111 and AA6351-T6 aluminum alloys. Mater Des. 2012;40:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aval HJ, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi A. The influence of tool geometry on the thermo-mechanical and microstructural behaviour in friction stir welding of AA5086. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2011;225(1):1–16. doi: 10.1243/09544062JMES2267
   Google Scholar
• Boz M, Kurt A. The influence of stirrer geometry on bonding and mechanical properties in friction stir welding process. Mater Des. 2004;25(4):343–347. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elangovan K, Balasubramanian V, Valliappan M. Influences of tool pin profile and axial force on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2008;38(3):285–295. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza-E-Rabby M. Quantification of the effect of tool geometric features on aspects of friction stir welding [dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Reza-E-Rabby M, Tang W, Reynolds A. Effect of tool pin features and geometries on quality of weld during friction stir welding. Friction Stir Welding and Processing VII: Springer; 2013. p. 163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Reza-E-Rabby M, Tang W, Reynolds A. Effect of tool pin features on process response variables during friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloys. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2015;20(5):425–432. doi: 10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long T, Tang W, Reynolds AP. Process response parameter relationships in aluminium alloy friction stir welds. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2007;12(4):311–317. doi: 10.1179/174329307X197566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang W, Guo X, McClure JC, et al. Heat input and temperature distribution in friction stir welding. J Mater Process Manuf Sci. 2008;7(2):163–172. doi: 10.1106/55TF-PF2G-JBH2-1Q2B
   Google Scholar
• Sato YS, Urata M, Kokawa H. Parameters controlling microstructure and hardness during friction-stir welding of precipitation-hardenable aluminum alloy 6063. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002;33(3):625–635. doi: 10.1007/s11661-002-0124-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldsaikhan E, McCoy M. Analysis of tool feedback forces and material flow during friction stir welding. Friction Stir Welding and Processing VII: Springer; 2013. p. 311–320.
   Google Scholar