Contraceptive counselling of women seeking abortion – a qualitative interview study of health professionals’ experiences

References

• Socialstyrelsen, National Board of Health and Welfare. Statistics on induced abortions 2014 [In Swedish: Abortstatistik 2014] [Internet]. [cited 2016 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2015/2015-9-4.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen S. Repeat abortion, repeat unintended pregnancy, repeated and misguided government policies. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2007;10:8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell C, Cameron S, Lawton J, et al. Contraceptive care at the time of medical abortion: experiences of women and health professionals in a hospital or community sexual and reproductive health context. Contraception. 2016;93:170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Krajewski C, Borrero S. Contraceptive counselling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:659–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman C, MacCannon S, Henderson T, et al. Contraceptive counseling in managed care: preventing unintended pregnancy in adults. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12:79–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie ML, Robson SC, May CR. Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Trussell J, Desfreres J, et al. Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France. Contraception. 2010;82:337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Diedrich J, Drey E, et al. Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobili MP, Piergrossi S, Brusati V, et al. The effect of patient-centered contraceptive counseling in women who undergo a voluntary termination of pregnancy. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:361–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, et al. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011;84:493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamaRao SLM, Costello M, Pangolibay B, et al. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003;29:76–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Läkemedelsverket, Medical Products Agency. Contraception – recommendation [In Swedish; Antikonception – behandlingsrekommendation] 2014 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Mar 8]. Available from: https://lakemedelsverket.se/upload/halso-och-sjukvard/behandlingsrekommendationer/Antikonception_rek.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen, National Board of Health and Welfare. National Board of Health regulations on abortion, In Swedish: Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter om abort; SOSFS 2009:15] 2009 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/sosfs/2009-15/allaversioner.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen, National Board of Health and Welfare. Medical abortions, distribution of tasks – practices and rules [In Swedish: Medicinska aborter, fördelning av arbetsuppgifter – praxis och regelverk] 2007 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/8599/2008-103-2_20081032.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson M, Berglund T, Forsberg M, et al. Sexual and reproductive health: health in Sweden: The National Public Health Report 2012. Chapter 9. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:176–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:a1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, et al. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28:117–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J, Freedman L, Speidel JJ, et al. Post-abortion contraception: qualitative interviews on counselling and provision of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;44:100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher WA, Singh SS, Shuper PA, et al. Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion. CMAJ. 2005;172:637–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makenzius M, Tyden T, Darj E, et al. Repeat induced abortion - a matter of individual behaviour or societal factors? A cross-sectional study among Swedish women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:369–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone P, Mehta YH, McGeechan K, et al. Factors predicting uptake of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among women presenting for abortion. Med J Aust. 2014;201:412–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:115 e1–115 e17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper CC, B B, Foster-Rosales A, Raine TR. Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Levy K, Kelley A, et al. Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception. 2013;88:250–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makenzius M, Tyden T, Darj E, et al. Autonomy and dependence-experiences of home abortion, contraception and prevention. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27:569–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikinheimo O, Gissler M, Suhonen S. Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion. Contraception. 2008;78:149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD004317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kero A, Lalos A. Increased contraceptive use one year post-abortion. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3085–3090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1998–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilander H, Alehagen S, Svedlund L, et al. Likelihood of repeat abortion in a Swedish cohort according to the choice of post-abortion contraception: a longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:565–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron ST, Glasier A, Chen ZE, et al. Effect of contraception provided at termination of pregnancy and incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2012;119:1074–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S14–S21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin MK, Edelman AB. The effect of long-acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: a review. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S47–S53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KM, Speidel JJ, Saporta V, et al. Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2011;83:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langston AM, Joslin-Roher SL, Westhoff CL. Immediate post-abortion access to IUDs, implants and DMPA reduces repeat pregnancy within 1 year in a New York City practice. Contraception. 2014;89:103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman S, Hendlish SK, Reeves MF, et al. Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion. Contraception. 2008;78:143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar