https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-2586
References
- Miller WB, Severy LJ, Pasta DJ. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Popul Stud (Camb). 2004;58:193–205.
- Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C, et al. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet. 2013;381:1642–1652.
- Becker S. Measuring unmet need: wives, husbands or couples? Int Family Plan Perspect. 1999;25:172–180.
- Marcell AV, Gibbs SE, Choiriyyah I, et al. National needs of family planning among US men aged 15 to 44 years. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:733–739.
- Park J, Nordstrom SK, Weber KM, et al. Reproductive coercion: uncloaking an imbalance of social power. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:74–78.
- Rosina A, Testa MR. Couples’ first child intentions and disagreement: an analysis of the Italian case. Eur J Population. 2009;25:487–502.
- Berrington A. Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behavior. Population Trends. 2004;117:9–19.
- Cha S, Chapman DA, Wan W, et al. Discordant pregnancy intentions in couples and rapid repeat pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:494e1–e12.
- MacQuarrie KLD, Edmeades J. Whose fertility preferences matter? Women, husbands, in-laws, and abortion in Madhya Pradesh, India. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2015;34:615–639.
- Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 1985.
- Moreau C, Hall K, Trussell J, et al. Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:642–650.
- Bartz D, Shew M, Ofner S, et al. Pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviors among adolescent women: a coital event level analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:271–276.
- Moreau C, Trussell J, Desfreres J, et al. Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France. Contraception. 2010;82:337–344.
- Sonfield A, Hasstedt K, Gold RB. Moving forward: family planning in the era of health reform. New York (UK): Guttmacher Institute; 2014.
- Thomson E, Hoem JM. Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography. 1998;35:315–322.
- Jansen M, Liefbroer AC. Couples’ attitudes, childbirth, and the division of labor. J Fam Issues. 2006;27:1487–1511.
- Bauer G, Kneip T. Fertility from a couple perspective: a test of competing decision rules on proceptive behaviour. Eur Sociol Rev. 2013;29:535–548.
- Stein P, Pavetic M. A nonlinear simultaneous probit-model for the investigation of decision-making processes: modelling the process of setting up a family in partnerships. Qual Quant. 2013;47:1717–1732.
- Bauer G, Kneip T. Dyadic fertility decisions in a life course perspective. Adv Life Course Res. 2014;21:87–100.
- Corijn M, Liefbroer AC, De Jong Gierveld J. It takes two to tango, doesn't it? The influence of couple characteristics on the timing of the birth of the first child. J Marriage Fam. 1996;58:117–126.
- Kraft JM, Harvey SM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, et al. Pregnancy motivations and contraceptive use: hers, his, or theirs? Womens Health Issues. 2010;20:234–241.
- Becker S. Couples and reproductive health: a review of couple studies. Stud Fam Plann. 1996;27:291–306.