A follow-up study of the long-term satisfaction, reproductive experiences, and self-reported health status of oocyte donors in Spain

References

• Lutjen P, Trounson A, Leeton J, et al. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature. 1984;307:174–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings G, de Mouzon J, Shenfield F, et al. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1076–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, Calhas-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al., The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Human Reproduction. 2018;33(9):1586–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Kupka M, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2318–2331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyboe AA, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1267–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, et al. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:29–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari FC, Liefbroer AC, Philipov D. The postponement of childbearing in Europe: driving forces and implications. Population Yearbook. 2006;4:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer MV. Defining the incidence of serious complications experienced by oocyte donors: a review of 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:277–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. Mishaps and misfortunes: complications that occur in oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:963–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodri D, Guillén JJ, Polo A, et al. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell KN, Cholst IN, Rosenwaks Z. The incidence of both serious and minor complications in young women undergoing oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2165–2171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez ER, Gomez-Palomares JL, Ricciarelli E. No room for cancellation, coasting, or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donation cycles. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1358–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg H, Epstein Y. Follow-up study of anonymous ovum donors. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2741–2747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding D, Handley S, Duqueno L, et al. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;8:273–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd LM, Sidebotham M, Lieberman B. Egg donation-the donor's view: an aid to future recruitment. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2002;5:175–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenney NJ, McGowan ML. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:455–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodriff M, Sauer MV, Klitzman R. Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:662–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila V. Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3073–3076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila V, Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, et al. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoop D, Vercammen L, Polyzos NP, et al. Effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval on reproductive outcome in oocyte donors. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1328–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer W, Schneider J, Schultz N. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3144–3149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, et al. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:450–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purewal S, van den Akker OB. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:499–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisol L, MR, Fertilidad e infertilidad humanas. En Libro Blanco Sociosanitario. “La infertilidad en España: Situación actual y perspectivas”. Las Matas (Madrid): Coordinación editorial Imago Concept & Image Development, S.L. 2011: p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Moorlock G, Ives J, Draper H. Altruism in organ donation: an unnecessary requirement? J Med Ethics. 2014;40:134–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling R. Why do you want to be a donor?’: gender and the production of altruism in egg and sperm donation. New Genet Soc. 2006;25(2):143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock SC, Braverman AM, Rausch DT. Predicting anonymous egg donor satisfaction: a preliminary study. J Womens Health. 1998;7:229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schover LR, Collins RL, Quigley MM, et al. Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1487–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan CB, Belar CD, Williams RS. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;25:145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar