Acceptability of the copper intrauterine device as a form of emergency contraception in New South Wales, Australia

References

• Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, et al. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e380–e389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe H, Holton S, Kirkman M, et al. Prevalence and distribution of unintended pregnancy: the Understanding Fertility Management in Australia National Survey. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2016;40:104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Godfrey EM, Wojdyla D, et al. Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception: a prospective, multicentre, cohort clinical trial. BJOG. 2010;117:1205–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. Emergency Contraception [Online]. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Clinical Guidance. 2011 [Aug 2011, update Jan 2012]. Available from: https: www.fsrh.org/documents/ceu-emergency-contraception-jan-2012/.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland K, Zhu H, Goldstuck N, et al. The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1994–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Gülmezoglu AM, Piaggio GGP, Ezcurra EE, Van Look PPFA. Interventions for emergency contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;CD001324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister L, Macve J, Pinkey B, et al. Is the faculty of family planning and reproductive health care guidance on emergency contraception being followed in general practice? An audit in the West Midlands, UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2007;33:195–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo T, Bleck J, Westley E. Knowledge and use of emergency contraception: a multicountry analysis. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;40:79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Jones J, Abma J. Use of emergency contraception among women aged 15–44: United States, 2006–2010. NCHS Data Brief 2013:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Richters J, Fitzadam S, Yeung A, et al. Contraceptive practices among women: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Contraception. 2016;94:548–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope LL, Hattingh H, King MA. Australian pharmacy students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours regarding emergency contraception. Pharm Educ. 2016;16:11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FSRH. Online survey of women aged 18–45 on emergency contraception Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health (FSRH): Poll of reproductive women aged 18–45: ComRes; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland K, Raymond EG, Westley E, et al. Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black KI. Developments and challenges in emergency contraception. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:221–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper CC, Speidel JJ, Drey EA, et al. Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:220–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz EB, Kavanaugh M, Douglas E, Dubowitz T, et al. Interest in intrauterine contraception among seekers of emergency contraception and pregnancy testing. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:833–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batur P, Cleland K, McNamara M, et al. Emergency contraception: a multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices. Contraception 2016;93:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. Contraception (NICE Quality Standard No 129): National Institute for Health Care and Excellence; 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs129
   Google Scholar
• Black KI, Hussainy SY. Emergency contraception: Oral and intrauterine options. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46:722–726.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron ST, Glasier A, Johnstone A, et al. Ongoing contraception after use of emergency contraception from a specialist contraceptive service. Contraception 2011;84:368–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lader D. Opinions Survey Report No.41. Contraception and Sexual Health 2008/09. London: NHS, Office for National Statistics; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman SR, El Ayadi AM, Rocca CH, et al. The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know? Contraception 2018;98:115–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baheiraei A, Khoori E, Foroushani AR, et al. What sources do adolescents turn to for information about their health concerns? Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2014;26:61–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marie Stopes Australia. Emergency Contraception. Available from: https://www.mariestopes.org.au/contraception/emergency-contraception/.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone P, Mehta YH, McGeechan K, et al. Factors predicting uptake of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among women presenting for abortion. Med J Aust. 2014;201:412–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D, McNicholas C, Peipert JF. Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:S59–S63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, et al. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:115 e1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonfield A, et al. The social and economic benefits of women’s ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, et al. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011;84:493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving G, Neves AL, Dambha-Miller H, et al. International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza D, Bateson D, Frearson M, et al. Current barriers and potential strategies to increase the use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) to reduce the rate of unintended pregnancies in Australia: An expert roundtable discussion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57:206–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Digiusto E, Bateson D, et al. Outcomes of intrauterine device insertion training for doctors working in primary care. Aust Fam Physician. 2016;45:837–841.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemeny F, Digiusto E, Bateson D. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices by registered nurses in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;56:92–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming KC, Botfield J, Sousa M, et al. Inclusion of intrauterine device insertion to registered nurses’ scope of clinical practice. Collegian. 2019;26(1)28–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg A, Griffin-Tomas M, Abu-Odeh D, et al. Evaluation of a mobile phone app for providing adolescents with sexual and reproductive health information, New York City, 2013–2016. Public Health Rep. 2018;133:234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar