2,724
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Evaluation of a patient-centred, needs-based approach to support shared decision making in contraceptive counselling: the COCO study

, &
Pages 326-333 | Received 23 Oct 2020, Accepted 20 Mar 2021, Published online: 19 Apr 2021

References

  • Bitzer J, Marin V, Lira J. Contraceptive counselling and care: a personalized interactive approach. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(6):418–423.
  • Dehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Steinauer J, et al. Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(7):1374–1381.
  • Donnelly KZ, Foster TC, Thompson R. What matters most? The content and concordance of patients’ and providers’ information priorities for contraceptive decision making. Contraception. 2014;90(3):280–287.
  • Oppelt PG, Baier F, Fahlbusch C, et al. What do patients want to know about contraception and which method would they prefer? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(6):1483–1491.
  • Oppelt PG, Fahlbusch C, Heusinger K, et al. Situation of adolescent contraceptive use in Germany. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018;78(10):999–1007.
  • Kopp Kallner H, Thunell L, Brynhildsen J, et al. Use of contraception and attitudes towards contraceptive use in Swedish Women-A Nationwide Survey. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125990.
  • Hellström A, Gemzell Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H. Trends in use and attitudes towards contraception in Sweden: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24(2):154–160.
  • Merki-Feld GS, Caetano C, Porz TC, et al. Are there unmet needs in contraceptive counselling and choice? Findings of the European TANCO study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018;23(3):183–193.
  • Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(5):1105–1113.
  • Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA). Contraceptive behavior in adults 2018 (in German); [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: www.bzga.de/infomaterialien/sexualaufklaerung/verhuetungsverhalten-erwachsener-2018.
  • Fiala C, Parzer E. 2019. Austrian contraception report 2019 (in German); [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: www.verhuetungsreport.at.
  • Birgisson NE, Zhao Q, Secura GM, et al. Preventing unintended pregnancy: the contraceptive CHOICE Project in review. J Womens Health. 2015;24(5):349–353.
  • Garbers S, Meserve A, Kottke M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a computer-based module to improve contraceptive method choice. Contraception. 2012;86(4):383–390.
  • Kottke M, Cwiak C, Goedken P, et al. Development of a contraceptive survey to be used in a computerized tool providing personalized output (meeting abstract). Contraception. 2007;76(2):174.
  • Garbers S, Meserve A, Kottke M, et al. Tailored health messaging improves contraceptive continuation and adherence: results from a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2012;86(5):536–542.
  • Holt K, Kimport K, Kuppermann M, et al. Patient-provider communication before and after implementation of the contraceptive decision support tool My Birth Control. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(2):315–320.
  • Dehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Fox E, et al. Cluster randomized trial of a patient-centered contraceptive decision support tool, My Birth Control. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(6):565.e1–565.e12.