Interference with and abuses of sexual and reproductive health and rights: a new proposal for classification and terminology

References

• Hayes P. Reproductive coercion and the Australian state: a new chapter? Aust Community Psychol. 2016;28(1):90–100.
   Google Scholar
• Dejoy G. State reproductive coercion as structural violence. Columbia Social Work Rev. 2019;17(1):36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Faso C. Contraceptive Pearl: understanding reproductive coercion. New York (NY): Reproductive Health Access Project; 2022. Available from: https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/contraeptive-pearl-understanding-reproductive-coercion/.
   Google Scholar
• NWHN Staff. Reproductive coercion and sterilization abuse. Washington (DC): National Women’s Health Network; 2020. Available from: https://nwhn.org/reproductive-coercion-and-sterilization-abuse/.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar G, Rhodes K, Davies M. Don’t you know that it’s toxic? #FreeBritney and the connection to reproductive oppression. Hartsdale (NY): Physicians for Reproductive Health; 2021. Available from: https://prh.org/updates/prh-in-action-6/.
   Google Scholar
• ESC. Position Paper on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights 2019. (The Madrid Declaration). Ternat (Belgium): European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; 2019. Available from: https://escrh.eu/position-paper-on-sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Network. Glossary of key terms in gender-based violence. London (Canada): Western Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children; 2022. Available from: https://www.vawlearningnetwork.ca/our-work/glossary/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine JH, Roberts KA, Korgen KO. Sociology, a unique way to view the world. Our social world: introduction to sociology. Los Angeles (CA): Sage publications; 2019. p. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Walker S. Reproductive control by others: means, perpetrators and effects. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019;45(1):61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monckton-Smith J. In control: dangerous relationships and how they end in murder. London: Bloomsbury; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Stark E. Coercive control: how men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow C, Walklate S. Coercive control. Abingdon: Routledge; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Holdsworth R, Sowemimo A. How to recognise and respond to reproductive coercion. BMJ. 2022; In press.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowlands S, Walker S. Reproductive coercion and abuse. In: Ali P, Rogers MM, editors. Comprehensive guide to gender-based violence. Cham: Springer; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Fleury-Steiner RE, Miller SL. Reproductive coercion and perceptions of future violence. Violence against Women. 2020;26(10):1228–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. File on 4: Controlling my birth control. Salford: BBC Radio 4; 2022. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00154bp.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fu Y, Ghazi P, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence against infertile women in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(6):E820–E830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarzia L, Srinivasan S, Marino J, et al. Exploring the gray areas between “stealthing” and reproductive coercion and abuse. Women Health. 2020;60(10):1174–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantler K, McCarry M. Forced marriage, coercive control, and conducive contexts: the experiences of women in Scotland. Violence against Women. 2020;26(1):89–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhamejan N, Zhakypbekova A. Bride kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan: a reflection of conservative values? Washington (DC): Central Asia Program, George Washington University, USA; 2022. Available from: https://centralasiaprogram.org/bride-kidnapping-kyrgyzstan-reflection-conservative-values.
   Google Scholar
• Bhanbhro S, Cronin de Chavez A, Lusambili A. Honour based violence as a global public health problem: a critical review of literature. IJHRH. 2016;9(3):198–215.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. Female genital mutilation (FGM) frequently asked questions. New York (NY): United Nations Population Fund; 2022. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-frequently-asked-questions.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. Female genital mutilation. New York (NY): UNICEF; 2021. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/protection/female-genital-mutilation.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. Puberty education & menstrual hygiene management. New York (NY): UNESCO; 2014. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000226792.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso LF, Clark CJ, Rivers K, et al. Menstrual restriction prevalence and association with intimate partner violence among Nepali women. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2019;45(1):38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E. What is human trafficking?: CPD Online College; 2022. Available from: https://cpdonline.co.uk/knowledge-base/safeguarding/human-trafficking/.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey J, Henry N, Flynn A. The Emerald international handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse. Bingley (UK): Emerald Publishing; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Black A, Bow M, Armson BA, et al. Committee opinion no. 419: coercion free contraceptive care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(9):1107–1111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowe P, Rowlands S. Long-acting reversible contraception: targeting those judged to be unfit for parenthood in the United States and the United Kingdom. Global Public Health. 2022;DOI:10.1080/17441692.2022.2048408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wale J, Rowlands S. The ethics of state-sponsored and clinical promotion of long-acting reversible contraception. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47(3):e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BPAS. Long-acting reversible contraception in the UK. Stratford-upon-Avon: British Pregnancy Advisory Service; Decolonising Contraception; Lancaster University; Shine Aloud UK; 2021. Available from: https://www.bpas.org/media/3477/larc-report-final-laid-up.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manzer JL, Bell AV. The limitations of patient-centred care: the case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caddy C, Williams H, Hocking J, et al. “I never went to see that doctor again”: a qualitative study examining Australian women’s experiences requesting removal of LARC within 12 months of insertion. Contraception. 2022;110:81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniz MH, Spector-Bagdady K, Perritt JB, et al. Balancing enhanced contraceptive access with risk of reproductive injustice: a United States comparative case study. Contraception. 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CR, Jerez C, Klein K, et al. Obstetric violence: a Latin American legal response to mistreatment during childbirth. BJOG. 2018;125(10):1208–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien E, Rich M. Obstetric violence in historical perspective. Lancet. 2022;399(10342):2183–2185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévesque S, Ferron-Parayre A. To use or not to use the term “obstetric violence”: commentary on the article by Swartz and Lappeman. Violence Against Women. 2021;27(8):1009–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampas C, Amin A, O'Hanlon L, et al. Operationalizing a human rights-based approach to address mistreatment against women during childbirth. Health Hum Rights. 2020;22(1):251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayra K, Matthews Z, Padmadas SS. Why do some health care providers disrespect and abuse women during childbirth in India? Women Birth. 2022;35:e49–e59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, et al. How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community surveys. Lancet. 2019;394(10210):1750–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimonović D. A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence A/74/137. New York (NY): United Nations; 2019. Available from: https://eipmh.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/UN_Res.71170.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick R. Breaking the frame: obstetric violence and epistemic rupture. Agenda. 2021;35(3):104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annborn A, Finnbogadóttir HR. Obstetric violence: a qualitative interview study. Midwifery. 2022;105:103212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson HL, Downe S. Discrimination against childbearing Romani women in maternity care in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birthrights. Systemic racism, not broken bodies. An inquiry into racial injustice and human rights in UK maternity care Coventry: Birthrights; 2022. Available from: https://www.birthrights.org.uk/campaigns-research/racial-injustice/.
   Google Scholar
• Nariño S, de Assis dos Santos JF. Tackling systemic racism in maternity care. Stanford (CA): Stanford Social Innovation Review; 2021. Available from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/tackling_systemic_racism_in_maternity_care.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz JT, Moreno CMR, Gil L, et al. Obstetric violence and abortion. Contributions to the debate in Colombia. Bogotá: Grupo Médico por el derecho a decidir; 2015. Available from: https://globaldoctorsforchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/Obstetric-Violence_and_Abortion_EN-final-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Larrea S, Assis MP, Mendoza CO. “Hospitals have some procedures that seem dehumanising to me”: experiences of abortion-related obstetric violence in Brazil, Chile and Ecuador. Agenda. 2021;35(3):54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele C, Chiarotti S. With everything exposed: cruelty in post-abortion care in Rosario, Argentina. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12(24 Suppl):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Wale J. Sterilisations at delivery or after childbirth: addressing continuing abuses in the consent process. Glob Public Health. 2019;14(8):1153–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amy J-J., Rowlands S. Legalised non-consensual sterilisation - Eugenics put into practice before 1945, and the aftermath. Part 1: USA, Japan, Canada and Mexico. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018;23(2):121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenheimer D, Huda Z, Yim ET, et al. Physician complicity in human rights violations: involuntary sterilization among women from North and Central America seeking asylum in the United States. J Forensic Legal Med. 2022;89:102358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Amy JJ. Non-consensual sterilization of women living with HIV. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(9):917–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn E. Belly of the beast. USA: 2020. Available from: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11454670/.
   Google Scholar
• PADS. Sharing the news: the maternity experience of parents of a baby with Down syndrome. Leamington Spa: Positive About Down Syndrome; 2019. Available from: https://downsyndromeuk.co.uk/flipbook.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; 2002. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laverty C, de Vos D. Reproductive violence as a category of analysis: disentangling the relationship between ‘the sexual’ and ‘the reproductive’ in transitional justice. Int J Transitional Justice. 2021;15(3):616–635.
   Google Scholar
• Carranza Ko NP. Making the case for genocide, the forced sterilization of indigenous peoples of Peru. GSP. 2020;14(2):90–103.
   Google Scholar
• UN. Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide. New York (NY): United Nations; 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen DK, Green AH, Wood EJ. Wartime sexual violence. Washington (DC): United States Institute of Peace; 2013. Available from: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/SR323.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nordås R, Cohen DK. Conflict-related sexual violence. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2021;24(1):193–211.
   Google Scholar
• Mannell J. Sexual violence in Ukraine. BMJ. 2022;377:o1016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom M. Rape by Russian soldiers in Ukraine is the latest example of a despicable wartime crime that spans the globe. The Conversation. 2022 April 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. Syria: fatal airstrike on maternity hospital a potential war crime. London: Amnesty International; 2016. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/07/syria-fatal-airstrike-on-maternity-hospital-a-potential-war-crime/.
   Google Scholar
• MSF. Afghanistan: one year after the massacre in a maternity ward. Geneva: Médecins Sans Frontières; 2021. Available from: https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/afghanistan-one-year-after-massacre-maternity-ward.
   Google Scholar
• Coynash H. Russia effectively admits it deliberately bombed the maternity hospital in Mariupol that killed three patients, including a child. Kharkiv, Ukraine: Kjarkiv Human Rights Protection Group; 2022. Available from: https://khpg.org/en/1608810176
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Regmi P. The use of forced sterilisation as a key component of population policy: comparative case studies of China, India, Puerto Rico and Singapore. Indian J Public Adm. 2022;68(2):271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Wale J, Rowlands S. Incentivised sterilisation: lessons from India and for the future. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020;25(4):314–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandagiri R. What’s so troubling about ‘voluntary’ family planning anyway? A feminist perspective. Popul Stud (Camb). 2021;75(sup1):221–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stejskalová M, Szilvási M. Coercive and cruel: sterilisation and its consequences for Romani women in the Czech Republic (1966–2016). Budapest: European Roma Rights Centre; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Amy JJ, Rowlands S. Legalised non-consensual sterilisation - Eugenics put into practice before 1945, and the aftermath. Part 2: Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018;23(3):194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch JD, Cedeño MA. Informed consent for family planning for poor women in Chiapas, Mexico. Lancet. 1999;354(9176):419–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergès F. The wombs of women: race, capital, feminism. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands S, Amy JJ. Sterilization of those with intellectual disability: evolution from non-consensual interventions to strict safeguards. J Intellect Disabil. 2019;23(2):233–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOJ. Eugenics and Health Protection Act Taipei: Ministry of Justice, Taiwan; 1984. Available from: https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070001.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson MM. Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(5):280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaliere G, Fletcher JR. Age-discriminated IVF access and evidence-based ageism: is there a better way? Sci Technol Human Values. DOI:10.1177/01622439211021914.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands S. Abortion law of jurisdictions around the world. Ternat, Belgium: FIAPAC; 2022. Available from: https://www.fiapac.org/media/uploads/abortion_laws_around_the_world_sam_rowlands_rev_2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Abortion care guideline. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/349316.
   Google Scholar
• Remez L, Mayall K, Singh S. Global developments in laws on induced abortion: 2008–2019. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46(Suppl 1):53–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doran F, Nancarrow S. Barriers and facilitators of access to first trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(3):170–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar