Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews

References

• UNICEF. The state of the World’s children 1992; [cited 2018 July16]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/about/history/files/sowc_1992.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. ADDING IT UP: investing in Contraception and Maternal and Newborn Health; [cited 2019 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/adding-it-up-contraception-mnh-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu L, et al. Maternal death averted by contraceptive use: an analysis of 172 countries. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):111–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton R. Reviving reproductive health. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton R, Peterson HB. The rebirth of family planning. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. Every woman every child. Family planning 2020; [cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.everywomaneverychild.org/commitment/family-planning-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Dockalova B, Lau K, Barclay H, et al. Sustainable development goals and family planning 2020. London (UK): International Planned Parenthood Federation; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Obare F, Kabiru C, Chandra-Mouli V, et al. Family planning evidence brief – reducing early and unintended pregnancies among adolescents: WHO/RHR/17.10. Geneva: World Heath Organisation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C, et al. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1642–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver S, Stephenson J, Bailey JFactors in contraception choice and use: a synthesis of systematic reviews. PROSPERO, et al. 2017. CRD42017081521. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017081521.
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an Umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-Reviewer 4: software for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre. Software. London: Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver S, Rees R, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect. 2008;11(1):72–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Tackling inequalities in health: what can we learn from what has been tried? Working paper prepared for the King’s Fund International Seminar on Tackling Inequalities in Health; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman NL, de Visser RO, Mercer CH, et al. Targeting sexual health services in primary care: a systematic review of the psychosocial correlates of adverse sexual health outcomes reported in probability surveys of women of reproductive age. Prevent Med. 2015;81:345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravilla JC, Betts KS, Couto e Cruz C, et al. Factors influencing repeated teenage pregnancy: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):527–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayanore MA, Pavlova M, Groot W. Unmet reproductive health needs among women in some West African countries: a systematic review of outcome measures and determinants. Reprod Health. 2016;13:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Blank L, Guillaume L, et al. Views regarding the use of contraception amongst young people in the UK: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16(3):149–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain AW, Williams JR, Zapata LB, et al. Confidentiality in family planning services for young people a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2 Suppl 1):S85–S92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoga LA, Rodolpho JR, Sato PM, et al. Adult men’s beliefs, values, attitudes and experiences regarding contraceptives: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(7-8):927–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James-Hawkins L, Peters C, VanderEnde K, et al. Women’s agency and its relationship to current contraceptive use in lower- and Middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(7):843–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas K, Crutzen R, van den Borne B, et al. Healthcare workers’ behaviors and personal determinants associated with providing adequate sexual and reproductive healthcare services in Sub-Saharan africa: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan R, Wynter K, Fisher J. Factors associated with pregnancy among adolescents in low-income and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(9):918–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt R, Stephenson J, Mann S. What influences contraceptive behaviour in women who experience unintended pregnancy? A systematic review of qualitative research. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(8):693–699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tessema GA, Streak Gomersall J, Mahmood MA, et al. Factors determining quality of care in family planning services in africa: a systematic review of mixed evidence. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson L, Parkes A, Wight D, et al. Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research. Reprod Health. 2009;6:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yakubu I, Salisu WJ. Determinants of adolescent pregnancy in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoola AB, Nettleman M, Brewer J. Reasons for unprotected intercourse in adult women. J Womens Health. 2007;16(3):302–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black K, Lotke P, Buhling KJ, et al. A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012;17(5):340–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone SR, Nwaozuru U, Iwelunmor J. Factors influencing contraceptive use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017;37(2):79–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombe J, Harris ML, Loxton D. What qualities of long-acting reversible contraception do women perceive as desirable or undesirable? A systematic review. Sex Health. 2016;13(5):404–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vouking MZ, Evina CD, Tadenfok CN. Male involvement in family planning decision making in Sub-Saharan Africa- what the evidence suggests. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyatt KD, Anderson RT, Creedon D, et al. Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ackerson K, Zielinski R. Factors influencing use of family planning in women living in crisis affected areas of Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of the literature. Midwifery. 2017;54:35–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askari F, Khadivzadeh T, Maleki-Saghooni N. Spousal relationship and childbearing: a review article. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2018;5(2):68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Huda FA, Robertson Y, Chowdhuri S, et al. Contraceptive practices among married women of reproductive age in Bangladesh: a review of the evidence. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mooney-Somers J, Lau A, Bateson D, et al. Enhancing use of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review of women’s attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and experiences in Australia. Health Care Women Int. 2019;40(2):174–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munakampe MN, Zulu JM, Michelo C. Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes and practices among adolescents from low and Middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):909.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira AL, Lemos A, Figueiroa JN, et al. Effectiveness of contraceptive counselling of women following an abortion: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009;14(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Nirantharakumar K, Truchanowicz EG, et al. Motivational interviews to improve contraceptive use in populations at high risk of unintended pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;191:72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(10):CD004317.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez LM, Grey TW, Chen M, et al. Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;27(11):CD011298.
   Google Scholar
• Dittus PJ, Michael SL, Becasen JS, et al. Parental monitoring and its associations with adolescent sexual risk behavior: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):e1587–e1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin LE, Williams JR, Rivera MI, et al. Programs to strengthen parent-adolescent communication about reproductive health: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2 Suppl 1):S65–S72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolli MV. Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention, adolescent pregnancy prevention and sexual health promotion for young people: a systematic review of European studies. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(5):904–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CR, Free C. Recent evaluations of the peer-led approach in adolescent sexual health education: a systematic review. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008;40(3):144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, et al. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD005215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar