Contraceptive methods in adolescence: a narrative review of guidelines

References

• Ott MA, Sucato GS, Committee on Adolescnence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):e1257–e1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Adolescent pregnancy, contraception and sexual activity. Committee opinion no. 699. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e142–e149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, et al. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(2):223–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Counseling adolescents about contraception. Committee opinion no. 710. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma JC, Martinez GM. Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the United States, 2011-2015. Natl Health Stat Report. 2017;2017:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Raidoo S, Kaneshiro B. Contraception counseling for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29(5):310–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Adolescent contraceptive use: glossary of terms. WHO; 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252536
   Google Scholar
• Hock-Long L, Herceg-Baron R, Cassidy AM, et al. Access to adolescent reproductive health services: financial and structural barriers to care. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35(3):144–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravilla JC, Betts KS, Couto e Cruz C, et al. Factors influencing repeated teenage pregnancy: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):527–545.e31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Meglio G, Crowther C, Simms J. Contraceptive care for Canadian youth. Paediatr Child Health. 2018;23(4):271–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(735):e130–e139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Contraceptive choices for young people. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020;32:100048.
   Google Scholar
• Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (part 1 of 4). J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2015;37(10):936–938.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (part 2 of 4). J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2015;37(11):1033–1035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (part 3 of 4): chapter 7 - intrauterine contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(2):182–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor KE, Khadr SN. Contraception for adolescents (American Academy of Pediatrics). Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016;101(2):61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis KM, Jatlaoui TC, Tepper NK, et al. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(4):1–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Contraceptive services with a focus on young people aged up to 25. Public Health Guideline (PH51) 2014;25:1–29. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph51
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Guidelines Review Committee. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: a WHO family planning cornerstone. Geneva: WHO; 2015. p. 210.
   Google Scholar
• Menon S, Alderman EM, Chung RJ, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception: specific issues for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;146(2):e2020007252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creinin M, Kohn JE, Tang JH, et al. Society of Family Planning Committee statement on IUD nomenclature. Contraception. 2022;106:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman LB, Monasterio E, Hwang LY. Adolescent contraception: review and guidance for pediatric clinicians. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2012;42(9):221–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxatto HB. Mechanisms that explain the contraceptive action of progestin implants for women. Contraception. 2002;65(1):21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaxton L, Lavelanet A. Systematic review of efficacy with extending contraceptive implant duration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(1):2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Akin A, Bahamondes L, et al. Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2491–2498. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/31/11/2491/2274325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholas C, Swor E, Wan L, et al. Prolonged use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device: 2 years beyond Food and Drug Administration-approved duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):586.e1–586.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(9):552–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SF, Strohsnitter W, Baecher-Lind L. Practices and perceptions among pediatricians regarding adolescent contraception with emphasis on intrauterine contraception. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(5):281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler AE, Campagnoli C, Druckmann R, et al. Reprint of classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas. 2008;61(1–2):171–180. http://www.maturitas.org/article/S0378512208003514/fulltext.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter D. International perspectives: IUDs and adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(5S):S36–S42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golden NH. Bones and birth control in adolescent girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020;33(3):249–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beerthuizen R, van Beek A, Massai R, et al. Bone mineral density during long-term use of the progestagen contraceptive implant implanon® compared to a non-hormonal method of contraception. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(1):118–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apter D. Contraception options: aspects unique to adolescent and young adult. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;48:115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeyemi-Fowode OA, Bercaw-Pratt JL. Intrauterine devices: effective contraception with noncontraceptive benefits for adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(5S):S2–S6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Improving knowledge about, access to, and utilization of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Heal. 2017;60:472–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, et al. Canadian contraception consensus part 4 of 4 chapter 9: combined hormonal contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(4):229–268.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranteau L. Contraception for adolescents. Med Ther Pediatr. 2018;21:101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Festin MPR. Overview of modern contraception. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;66:4–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromer BA, Blair JMA, Mahan JD, et al. A prospective comparison of bone density in adolescent girls receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), levonorgestrel (norplant), or oral contraceptives. J Pediatr. 1996;129(5):671–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone effects. Committee Opinion No. 602. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1396–1402.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley J, Hammond C. Combined oral contraceptives: a comprehensive review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(4):868–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J. Oral contraceptives. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311(3):321.
   Google Scholar
• Howard B, Trussell J, Grubb E, et al. Comparison of pregnancy rates in users of extended and cyclic combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimens in the United States: a brief report. Contraception. 2014;89(1):25–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD004317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata LB, Steenland MW, Brahmi D, et al. Patient understanding of oral contraceptive pill instructions related to missed pills: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013;87(5):674–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabbert-Buffet N, Jamin C, Lete I, et al. Missed pills: frequency, reasons, consequences and solutions. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(3):165–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagshaw S. The combined oral contraceptive: risks and adverse effects in perspective. Drug Saf. 1995;12(2):91–96. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L25070370%5Cnhttp://sfx.library.uu.nl/utrecht?sid=EMBASE&issn=01145916&id=doi:&atitle=The+combined+oral+contraceptive%3A+Risks+and+adverse+effects+in+perspective&stitle=DRUG+SAF.&tit.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenor CC, Chung RJ, Michelson AD, et al. Hormonal contraception and thrombotic risk: a multidisciplinary approach. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick SS, Hagberg KW, Kaye JA, et al. The risk of unintended pregnancies in users of the contraceptive patch compared to users of oral contraceptives in the UK General Practice Research Database. Contraception. 2009;80(2):142–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner MS, Black A. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring: an update. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2016;5(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Galzote R, Rafie S, Teal R, et al. Transdermal delivery of combined hormonal contraception: a review of the current literature. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien RF, Warner L, Blythe MJ, et al. Condom use by adolescents. Pediatrics. 2013;132(5):973–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen JM, Adler N, Gurvey JE, et al. Adolescent condom use and perceptions of risk for sexually transmitted diseases: a prospective study. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(12):756–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manlove J, Ikramullah E, Terry-Humen E. Condom use and consistency among male adolescents in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43(4):325–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown LK, DiClemente R, Crosby R, et al. Condom use among high-risk adolescents: anticipation of partner disapproval and less pleasure associated with not using condoms. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(5):601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearinger LH, Resnick MD. Dual method use in adolescents: a review and framework for research on use of STD and pregnancy protection. J Adolesc Heal. 2003;32(5):340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhoff C, Kerns J, Morroni C, et al. Quick start: a novel oral contraceptive initiation method. Contraception. 2002;66(3):141–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs (CCP). Knowledge for health project. Family planning: a global handbook for providers (2018 update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Westhoff C, Heartwell S, Edwards S, et al. Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1270–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara-Torre E, Schroeder B. Adolescent compliance and side effects with quick start initiation of oral contraceptive pills. Contraception. 2002;66(2):81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Health Education In Family Medicine, Department of Family and Social Medicine - Montefiore Medical Center. Quick start algorithm. https://www.rhedi.org/quick-start-algorithms/.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhya KK, Breuner CC, Alderman EM, et al. Emergency contraception. Pediatrics. 2019;144(6):e20193149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland K, Raymond EG, Westley E, et al. Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(4):741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour D, Inki P, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15(1):4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles MS, Urbach K, Conard LAE, et al. Emergency contraception for adolescents and young adults: guidance for health care professionals the society for adolescent health and medicine. J Adolesc Heal. 2016;58:245–248. Available from:
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman AB, Cherala G, Blue SW, et al. Impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel based emergency contraception: single and double dosing. Contraception. 2016;94(1):52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond EWE, Blithe D, et al. Safety and effectiveness data for emergency contraceptive pills among women with obesity: a systematic review. Int Consort Emerg Contracept Int Fed Gynecol Obstet. 2012;63:16.
   Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Krajewski C, Borrero S. Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(4):659–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer J, Abalos V, Apter D, et al. Targeting factors for change: contraceptive counselling and care of female adolescents. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(6):417–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merki-Feld GS, Bitzer J. Contraception in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Is there evidence for a negative impact of combined hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density and the course of the disease? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020;25(3):213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes FRP, Das Neves FA, Geraldes F, et al. Contraception in adolescents with intellectual disability. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(6):401–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savioja H, Helminen M, Fröjd S, et al. Delinquency and sexual experiences across adolescence: does depression play a role? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(4):298–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sober S, Shea J, Shaber A, et al. Postpartum adolescents’ contraceptive counselling preferences. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(2):83–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrense-Dias Y, Stadelmann S, Suris JC, et al. From request to dispensation: how adolescent and young adult females experience access to emergency contraception in pharmacies. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;22:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ragnar ME, Grandahl M, Stern J, et al. Important but far away: adolescents’ beliefs, awareness and experiences of fertility and preconception health. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018;23(4):265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekine K, Khadka N, Carandang RR, et al. Mulitlevel factors influencing contraceptive use and childbearing among adolescent girls in Bara district of Nepal: a qualitative study using the socioecological model. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e046156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claringbold L, Sanci L, Temple-Smith M. Factors influencing young women’s contraceptive choices. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(6):389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes Reis Y, Vilela AL, de Souza Costa A, et al. Factors associated with adolescents’ choice to use long acting reversible contraceptives: a systematic review. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2018;7(4):153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar