A theory of gender’s effect on vote shift with a test based on Turkish elections

References

• Abdullah, A., Tuna, T., & Kadir Yildirim, A. (2019). Ideological congruence and social media text as data. Representation, 55(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1592012
   Google Scholar
• Aksoy, H. A. (2015). Invigorating democracy in turkey: the agency of organized islamist women. Politics & Gender, 11(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1500001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arat, Y. (2005). Rethinking Islam and liberal democracy: islamist women in turkish politics. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayan, P. (2010). Authoritarian party structures in turkey: a comparison of the republican people’s party and the justice and development party. Turkish Studies, 11(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2010.483859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayata, A. G., & Tütüncü, F. (2008). Party Politics of the AKP (2002–2007) and the predicaments of women at the intersection of the westernist, islamist and feminist discourses in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 35(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530190802525130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, N. M. (2015). Emotional, Sensitive, and unfit for office? gender stereotype activation and support female candidates. Political Psychology, 36(6), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayulgen, O., Arbatli, E., & Canbolat, S. (2018). Elite survival strategies and authoritarian reversal in Turkey. Polity, 50(3), 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1086/698203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bektas, E., & Issever-Ekinci, E. (2019). Who represents women in turkey? an analysis of gender difference in private bill sponsorship in the 2011–15 turkish parliament. Politics & Gender, 15(4), 851–881. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bligh, M. C., Schlehofer, M. M., Casad, B. J., & Gaffney, A. M. (2012). Competent enough, but would you vote for her? gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(3), 560–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugay, A., Delevi, R., & Mullet, E. (2021). Attitude toward women in turkey: combined effect of sex, place, and culture. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3284–3292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00273-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caner, A., Guven, C., Okten, C., & Orcan Sakalli, S. (2016). Gender roles and the education gender gap in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1163-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. (2012). Economic evaluations vs. ideology: diagnosing the sources of electoral change in Turkey, 2002-2011. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., & Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2007). Turkish democracy today: elections, protest and stability in an islamic society. IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., & Holman, M. R. (2018). Party and gender stereotypes in campaign attacks. Political Behavior, 40(3), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., & Lovenduski, J. (2018). Power struggles: Gender equality in political representation. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1–2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15272520831085
   Google Scholar
• Cindoglu, D., & Unal, D. (2017). Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of ‘New Turkey’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816679003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coşar, S., & Yeğenoğlu, M. (2011). New Grounds for Patriarchy in Turkey? Gender Policy in the Age of AKP. South European Society & Politics, 16(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.571919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmofal, D. (2015). Spatial analysis for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diner, Ç. (2018). Gender Politics and GONGOs in Turkey. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 16(4), 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal Communication in Small Groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzese, J., Robert, J., & Jude, C. H. (2008). Interdependence in comparative politics: Substance, Theory, empirics, substance. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 742–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007313122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, S. J., & Hillard, A. L. (2011). A role congruity perspective on prejudice toward hillary clinton and sarah palin. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11(1), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L. (1992). The Political Consequences of Intolerance: Cultural Conformity and Political Freedom. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. The American Psychologist, 56(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneş-Ayata, A., & Doğangün, G. (2017). Gender Politics of the AKP: Restoration of a Religio- Conservative Gender Climate. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(6), 610–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2017.1328887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilkkaracan, I. (2019). Economic and political gender gaps and the rise of populism. Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (2010). Gender and women’s studies in turkey: a moment for reflection? New Perspectives on Turkey, 43, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089663460000580X
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konda. 2019. Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyet Raporu: Hayat Tarzları 2018 Araştırması. Technical report Konda.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnarella, P. J. (1967). Regional Voting in Turkey. The Muslim World, 57(3), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1967.tb01261.x
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., Harell, A., Thomas, M., & Gosselin, T. (2022). Competitive loss, gendered backlash and sexism in politics. Political Behavior, 44(1), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09724-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics? Daedalus, 102(1), 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., & Taylor, M. M. (1997). Electoral System Effects on Women’s Representation: Theoretical Arguments and Evidence from Costa Rica. Comparative Political Studies, 30(2), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, S. A., & DiMaria, M. G. (2019). Not “With Her”: How Gendered Political Slogans Affect Conservative Women’s Perceptions of Female Leaders. Sex Roles, 80(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0910-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D., & Smith, J. L. (2008). Subtle Sexism? Examining Vote Preferences When Women Run Against Men for the Presidency. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 29(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770802092576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2009). The ideological congruence controversy: the impact of alternative measures, data, and time periods on the effects of election rules. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1475–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2013). Representation in context: election laws and ideological congruence between citizens and governments. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712003635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2018). Ideological congruence: illusion or imperfection? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2007). Representation in new democracies: party stances on european integration in post-communist Eastern Europe. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1133–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2012). Institutional context and representational strain in party–voter agreement in western and eastern europe. West European Politics, 35(6), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S. (1977). Political Patronage in Turkey. In E. Gelner & J. Waterbury (Eds.), Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies (pp. 103–113). Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Seeberg, M. B. (2018). State capacity, economic control, and authoritarian elections. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sumbas, A. (2020). Gendered Local Politics: The Barriers to Women’s Representation in Turkey. Democratization, 27(4), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1706166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdal, H. (2006). A clash of generations? youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, M. D., & Skrede Gleditsch, K. (2018). Spatial Regression Models (Vol. 155). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthrich, F. M. (2021). The AKP, party system change, and political representation by women in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 48(5), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2020.1719035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, M. H. (2003). Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar