References
- Beck, C. J. (2017). The comparative method in practice: Case selection and the social science of revolution. Social Science History, 41(3), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2017.15
- De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2021). Who is responsible for disinformation? European approaches to social platforms’ accountability in the post-truth era. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(6), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989784
- European Digital Media Observatory. (2024). Mapping the media literacy sector: France. https://edmo.eu/resources/repositories/mapping-the-media-literacy-sector/france/
- Government of Spain. (2023, September 1). Componente 19: Plan Nacional de Competencias digitales. https://planderecuperacion.gob.es/sites/default/files/2023-10/0310203_adenda_plan_de_recuperacion_componente19.pdf
- Gracián, B. (2015). How to use your enemies. Penguin Books.
- Jansen, S., & Martin, B. (2015). The Streisand effect and censorship backfire. International Journal of Communication, 9, 656–671. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2498
- Keeley, L. B. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659
- Lamberty, K., Hellmann, J. H., & Oeberst, A. (2018). The winner knew it all? Conspiracy beliefs and hindsight perspective after the 2016 US general election. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.033
- Levendusky, M. S., & Stecula, D. A. (2021). We need to talk: How cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization. Cambridge University Press.
- Nefes, T. S. (2017). The impacts of the Turkish government’s conspiratorial framing about the Gezi Park protests. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1319269
- Nefes, T. S., & Aksoy, O. (2023). The impact of partisanship and religiosity on conspiracy-theory beliefs in Turkey. Sociology Compass, 18(1), e13152. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13152
- Peters, U. (2021). How (many) descriptive claims about political polarization exacerbate polarization. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5543
- Roberts, R., & Risen, J. L. (2022). Introducing conspiracy intuitions to better understand conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101395
- Saglam, E. (2020). What to do with conspiracy theories? Insights from contemporary Turkey. Anthropology Today, 36(5), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12606
- Torcal, M., & Thomson, Z. A. (2023). Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014-2019). Electoral Studies, 81, 102582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102582
- Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915621621
- Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.
- Van Prooijen, J. W., Spadaro, G., & Wang, H. (2022). Suspicion of institutions: How distrust and conspiracy theories deteriorate social relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.013
- Yee, A. (2022, January 31). The country inoculating against disinformation. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220128-the-country-inoculating-against-disinformation