Insights gained by schools and emotional consequences of school inspections. A review of evidence

References

• van Amelsvoort, G. H. W. C. H., K. T. Bos, F. J. G. Janssens, L. Klaver, J. Lelyveld, and M. Pol. 2006. Proportional Supervision and School Improvement from an International Perspective. Utrecht: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. 1998. “The Dark Side of the Moon: Imagining an End to Failure in Urban Education.” In No Quick Fixes. Perspectives on Schools in Difficulty, edited by Louise Stoll and K. Myers, 17–33. Bristol: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. A., and J. Clarke. 2013. “Farewell to the Tick Box Inspector? Ofsted and the Changing Regime of School Inspection in England.” In Oxford Review of Education, 39: 702–718. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.846852.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., P. Day, and R. Walker. 2002. “The Evaluation of Public Service Inspection: A Theoretical Framework.” Urban Studies 39: 1197–1212. doi: 10.1080/00420980220135563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimblecombe, N., and M. Ormston. 1995. “Teachers’ Perceptions of School Inspection: A Stressful Experience.” Cambridge Journal of Education 25: 53–61. (*) doi: 10.1080/0305764950250106
   Google Scholar
• Brimblecombe, N., Marian Shaw, and Michael Ormston. 1996. “Teachers’ Intention to Change Practice as a Result of OFSTED School Inspections.” Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 24 (4): 339–354. (*) doi: 10.1177/0263211X9602400401
   Google Scholar
• Brunsden, Vivienne, Mark Davies, and Mark Shevlin. 2006. “Anxiety and Stress in Educational Professionals in Relation to Ofsted.” Education Today 56: 24–31. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Case, P., S. Case, and S. Catling. 2000. “Please Show You're Working; A Critical Assessment of the Impact of Ofsted Inspection on Primary Teachers.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (4): 605–621. (*) doi: 10.1080/713655370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. 2001a. “Changing Classrooms Through Inspections.” School Leadership and Management 21: 59–73. (*) doi: 10.1080/13632430120033045
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. 2001b. “Unlocking the Potential: Inspection as a Mechanism for School Improvement.” Improving Schools 4 (Nov.): 41–50. doi: 10.1177/136548020100400306
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. 2002. “Ofsted and School Improvement: Teachers’ Perceptions of the Inspection Process in Schools Facing Challenging Circumstances.” School Leadership & Management 22: 257–272. (*) doi: 10.1080/1363243022000020390
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., and P. Earley. 2010. “School Inspection/External School Evaluation.” In International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed.), edited by P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw, 719–725. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. 1988. Organizing Knowledge Syntheses: A Taxonomy of Literature Reviews. Knowledge in Society 1 (1): 104–126. doi:10.1007/BF03177550.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Dionne I., and Ji Y. Hong. 2012. “An Ecological Examination of Teachers’ Emotions in the School Context.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (7): 957–967. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuckle, P., and P. Broadhead. 1999. “Effects of Ofsted Inspection on School Development and Staff Morale.” In An inspector Calls: Ofsted and its Effects on School Standards, edited by C. Cullingford, 176–187. London: Kogan Page. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Cuckle, P., J. Hodgson, and Pat Broadhead. 1998. “Investigating the Relationship Between OfSTED Inspections and School Development Planning.” School Leadership & Management 18: 271–283. (*) doi: 10.1080/13632439869691
   Google Scholar
• Dedering, K., and S. Müller. 2011. “School Improvement Through Inspections? First Empirical Insights from Germany.” Journal of Educational Change 12: 301–322. (*) doi: 10.1007/s10833-010-9151-9
   Google Scholar
• Denison, Patricia. 2005. “Beat Those Ofsted Blues.” Times Educational Supplement 4635: 30–30.
   Google Scholar
• DFES. 2005. Schools Causing Concern. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Döbert, H., and K. Dedering. 2008. “Externe Evaluation Von Schulen in Vergleichender Perspektive - Eine Einführung [External School Evaluation in Comparative Perspective – An Introduction].” In Externe Evaluation Von Schulen, edited by H. Döbert and K. Dedering, 11–22. Waxmann: Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P. 1998. “School Improvement and OFSTED Inspection: The Research Evidence.” In Improvement Through Inspection? Complementary Approaches to School Development, edited by P. Earley, B. Fidler, and J. Ouston, 11–22. London: David Fulton. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P., B. Fidler, and J. Ouston, eds. 1998. Improvement Through Inspection? Complementary Approaches to School Development. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M. 2010. “Effecten van toezicht op het basisonderwijs [Effects of inspection on primary education].” Pedagogische Studieën 87: 165–182.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., H. Altrichter, G. McNamara, and J. O'Hara. 2013. “Impact of School Inspections on Improvement of Schools—Describing Assumptions on Causal Mechanisms in Six European Countries.” Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability 25: 3–43. doi: 10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., F. L. Leeuw, and J. Scheerens. 2005. “On the Impact of the Dutch Educational Supervision Act: Analyzing Assumptions Concerning the Inspection of Primary Education.” American Journal of Evaluation 26: 60–76. doi: 10.1177/1098214004273182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M., J. Perryman, and N. Shackleton. 2014. “Setting Expectations for Good Education: How Dutch School Inspections Drive Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (2): 296–327. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.936472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., and A. J. Visscher. 2006. “Towards a Theory on the Impact of School Inspections.” British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (1): 51–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., and A. J. Visscher. 2008. “The Relationship Between School Inspections, School Characteristics and School Improvement.” British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (2): 205–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmelot, Y., S. Karsten, G. Ledoux, and A. Vermeulen. 2004. Ervaringen met het vernieuwde onderwijstoezicht. Amsterdam: SCO/Kohnstamminstituut. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Faubert, V. 2009. “School Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries.” In OECD Working Papers. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, N., P. Earley, J. Ouston, and P. Fidler. 1999. “New Heads, OFSTED Inspections and the Prospects for School Improvement.” Educational Research 41: 241–249. (*) doi: 10.1080/0013188990410301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, B., P. Earley, J. Ouston, and J. Davies. 1998. “Teacher Gradings and OFSTED Inspections: Help or Hindrance as a Management Tool?” School Leadership and Management 18: 257–270. doi: 10.1080/13632439869682
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, H., D. Hüsemann, and H. A. Pant. 2009. “Wirkungen von Schulinspektion aus Sicht betroffener Schulleitungen. Die Brandenburger Schulleiterbefragung.” Empirische Pädagogik 23 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, H., and H. A. Pant. 2011. “How Valid are School Inspections? Problems and Strategies for Validating Processes and Results.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37: 85–93. (*) doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P., and B. Wilcox. 1997. “OFSTED, Criteria and the Nature of Social Understanding: A Wittgensteinian Critique of the Practice of Educational Judgement.” British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (1): 22–38. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., B. McGaw, and Mary Lee Smith. 1981. Meta-analysis in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., and J. Gardner. 1999. “The Impact of School Inspections.” Oxford Review of Education 25: 455–468. (*) doi: 10.1080/030549899103928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J., and B. Wilcox. 1995. Good School, Bad School: Evaluating Performance and Encouraging Improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, L., and A. Gomersall. 2003. A Difficult Business: Finding the Evidence for Social Science Reviews. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. 2013. ”‘Living the Talk’? Inspecting as a Learning Act.” Paper presented at the European Conference of Educational Research, Istanbul, September 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. 1995. “School Culture, School Effectiveness and School Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 6: 23–46. doi: 10.1080/0924345950060102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., C. Chapman, Daniel Muijs, Jennifer Russ, and Louise Stoll. 2006. “Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts: Exploring the Possible.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17 (4): 409–424. doi: 10.1080/09243450600743483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., A. Harris, Rob Watling, and J. Beresford. 1999. “From Inspection to School Improvement? Evaluating the Accelerated Inspection Programme in Waltham Forest.” British Educational Research Association Journal 25: 679–690. (*) doi: 10.1080/0141192990250508
   Google Scholar
• Hosker, H., and S. Robb. 1998. “Raising Standards and Raising Morale: A Case Study of Change.” In School Improvement after Inspection? School and LEA Responses, edited by P. Earley, 86–96. London: Paul Chapman. (*)
   Google Scholar
• IIEP. 2011. Supervision: A Key Component of a Quality Monitoring System. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, F. J. G., and G. H. W. C. H. Van Amelsvoort. 2008. “School Self-Evaluations and School Inspections in Europe: An Exploratory Study.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 34: 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and P. Woods. 1996. “Feeling Deprofessionalized: The Social Construction of Emotions During an Ofsted Inspection.” Cambridge Journal of Education 26: 325–343. (*) doi: 10.1080/0305764960260303
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and P. Woods. 1998. Testing Teachers: The Effect of School Inspection on Primary Teachers. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., V. Beale, M. Kogan, and M. Maden. 1999. The Ofsted System of School Inspection: An Independent Evaluation. Uxbridge: Brunel University. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., and P. Tymms. 2014. “Ofsted's Role in Promoting School Improvement: The Mechanisms of the School Inspection System in England.” Oxford Review of Education 40 (3): 315–330. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.911726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G., and R. Vandenberghe. 1998. “ Internal Use of External Control and Support for Quality Improvement. The Response to a National Policy by Primary Schools.” Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 13–17, 1998. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, Maurice, and Margaret Maden. 1999. “An Evaluation of Evaluators: The Ofsted System of School Inspection.” In An Inspector Calls: Ofsted and its Effect on School Standards, edited by C. Cullingford, 9–32. London: Kogan Page. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, N. 2011. “Thesen zur Wirkung und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation [Theses on the Impact and Effectiveness of the External School Evaluation].” In Wirkungen und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation [Effects and Effectiveness of the External Evaluation of Schools], edited by C. Quesel, V. Husfeldt, N. Landwehr, and N. Steiner, 35–70. Bern: hep.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrenz, F., N. Keiser, and B. Lavoie. 2003. “Evaluative Site Visits: A Methodological Review.” American Journal of Evaluation 24: 341–352. doi: 10.1177/109821400302400304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth, J. 2000. Inspection. What's in it for Schools? London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, P., and C. Parsons. 1998. “Inspection and the School Improvement Hoax.” In School Improvement After Inspection? School and LEA Responses, edited by P. Earley, 110–125. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Macbeath, J. 2008. The Impact Study on the Effectiveness of External School Review in Enhancing School Improvement Through School Self-Evaluation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Education Bureau. (*)
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, N. 2011. “The Urgent Need for New Approaches in School Evaluation to Enable Scotland's Curriculum for Excellence.” Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability 23: 89–106. doi: 10.1007/s11092-011-9116-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnab, D. 2004. “Hearts, Minds and External Supervision of Schools: Direction and Development.” Educational Review 56: 53–64. doi: 10.1080/0013191032000152273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2005. “Evaluation, Inspection and the Improvement Agenda Contrasting Fortunes in an Era of Evidence-Based Policy-Making.” Evaluation 11: 496–504. doi: 10.1177/1356389005059385
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P., and P. Sammons. 2004. Improvement Through Inspection. An Evaluation of the Impact of Ofsted's Work. London: Ofsted. (*)
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, T., M. Coghlan, P. Wade, and P. Rudd. 2009. Evaluation of the Impact of Section 5 Inspections - Strand 3. Final report for Ofsted. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. (*)
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, T., P. Rudd, S. Blenkinsop, and P. Wade. 2006. Impact of Section 5 Inspections: Maintained Schools in England. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. (*)
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, T., P. Rudd, S. Blenkinsop, P. Wade, S. Rudd, and T. Yeshanew. 2007. Evaluation of the Impact of Section 5 Inspections. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. (*)
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, A. 2003. “Future Perfect.” Education Review 16 (2): 65–69.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., and J. O'Hara. 2006. “Workable Compromise or Pointless Exercise? School-based Evaluation in the Irish Context.” Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 34: 564–582. (*) doi: 10.1177/1741143206068218
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., J. O'Hara, P. L. Lisi, and S. Davidsdottir. 2011. “Operationalising Self-Evaluation in Schools: Experiences from Ireland and Iceland.” Irish Educational Studies 30: 63–82. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2011.535977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Foundation for Educational Research. 2009. New Inquiry into School Accountability. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, D. 2001. “School Evaluation: Internal or External?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 27 (2): 95–106. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00016-5
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaidou, M., and M. Ainscow. 2005. “Understanding Failing Schools: Perspectives from the Inside.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16 (3): 229–248. (*) doi: 10.1080/09243450500113647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. “Synergies for Better Learning. An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment.” In OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, G. 2007. “School Inspections - Experiences in Sweden.” In Schulinspektion: Evaluation, Rechenschaftslegung und Qualitätsentwicklung, edited by W. Böttcher and H. G. Kotthoff, 43–54. Münster: Waxmann. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Ouston, J., and J. Davies. 1998. “OFSTED and Afterwards? Schools’ Responses to Inspection.” In School Improvement After Inspection? School and LEA Responses, edited by P. Earley, 13–24. London: Paul Chapman. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Ouston, J., B. Fidler, and P. Earley. 1995. “ School Improvement through School Inspection?” AERA Conference, San Francisco. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Ouston, J., B. Fidler, and P. Earley. 1997. “What do Schools do After Ofsted School Inspections – or Before?” School Leadership and Management 17: 95–104. (*) doi: 10.1080/13632439770195
   Google Scholar
• Penzer, G. 2011. School Inspections: What Happens Next? Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2005. “School Leadership and Management after Special Measures: Discipline Without the Gaze?” School Leadership and Management 25: 281–297. (*) doi: 10.1080/13634230500116355
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2006. “Panoptic Performativity and School Inspection Regimes: Disciplinary Mechanisms and Life Under Special Measures.” Journal of Education Policy 21: 147–161. (*) doi: 10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2007. “Inspection and Emotion.” Cambridge Journal of Education 37: 173–190. (*) doi: 10.1080/03057640701372418
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. 2009. “Inspection and the Fabrication of Professional and Performative Processes.” Journal of Education Policy 24: 611–631. (*) doi: 10.1080/02680930903125129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, M. 2010. “Head's Suicide was ‘inextricably linked’ to Damning School Inspection.” The Times, January 20. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6994581.ece.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C. 2001. “School Inspection: A Re-appraisal.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (4): 655–665. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.00251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. 2008. “Zero Tolerance of Failure and New Labour Approaches to School Improvement in England.” Oxford Review of Education 34: 651–664. doi: 10.1080/03054980802518847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, I. 1996. Making Sense of Primary Inspection. Buckingham: Open University Press. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, M. 1999. The Impact of Ofsted Inspections. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Schagen, S., and C. Wylie. 2009. “School Resources, Culture and Connections.” In NZCER National Survey Thematic Report. Wellington: NZCER. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, P. A., J. Y. Hong, D. I. Cross, and J. N. Osbon. 2006. “Reflections on Investigating Emotion in Educational Activity Settings.” Educational Psychology Review 18 (4): 343–360. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9030-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., D. C. Gottfredson, D. L. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, and S. D. Bushwa. 1998. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, N., and E. Schwank. 2011. Evaluationsbefragung zur Nachinspektion. Erste Ergebnisse 2011. Hildesheim: Niedersächsisches Landesinstitut für schulische Qualitätsentwicklung. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 1998. “A Brief History of the Genesis of the New Schools’ Inspection System.” British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (4): 415–427. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., W. C. Yee, and J. Lee. 2000. “'Failing’ Special Schools - Action Planning and Recovery from Special Measures Assessments.” Research Papers in Education 15 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1080/026715200362925. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Troman, G. 1997. “Self-management and School Inspection: Complementary Forms of Surveillance and Control in the Primary School.” Oxford Review of Education 23: 345–364. (*) doi: 10.1080/0305498970230306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troman, G., and P. Woods. 2009. “Careers Under Stress: Teacher Adaptations at a Time of Intensive Reform.” In Teachers' Careers Trajectories and Work Lives, edited by Martin Bayer, Ulf Brinkkjær, Helle Plauborg and Simon Rolls, 117–135. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bruggen, J. C. 2010. Inspectorates of Education in Europe; Some Comparative Remarks about their Tasks and Work. Brussels: SICI.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, R., and A. M. Huberman. 1999. Understanding and Preventing Teacher Burnout. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldegrave, H., and J. Simons. 2014. Watching the Watchmen. The Future of School Inspections in England. London: Policy Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Watling, R., D. Hopkins, A. Harris, and J. Beresford. 1998. “Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea? Implication for School and LEA Development Following an Accelerated Inspection Programme.” In No Quick Fixes. Perspectives on Schools in Difficulty, edited by Louise Stoll and K. Myers, 47–63. Bristol: Falmer Press. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Webb, R., G. Vulliamy, K. Hakkinen, and S. Hamalainen. 1998. “External Inspection or School Self-Evaluation? A Comparison Analysis of Policy and Practice in Primary Schools in England and Finland.” British Educational Research Journal 24: 539–556. (*) doi: 10.1080/0141192980240504
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B., and J. Gray. 1995. “Reactions to Inspection: A Study of Three Variants.” In Good School, Bad School: Evaluating Performance and Encouraging Improvement, edited by J. Gray and B. Wilcox, 149–166. Buckingham: Open University Press. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B., and J. Gray. 1996. Inspecting Schools: Holding Schools to Account and Helping Schools to Improve. Buckingham: Open University Press. (*)
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C. 2001. “Towards a Non-Punitive School Inspection Regime.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (4): 683–694. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wolf, I. F., and F. J. G. Janssens. 2007. “Effects and Side Effects of Inspections and Accountability in Education: An Overview of Empirical Studies.” Oxford Review of Education 33: 379–396. doi: 10.1080/03054980701366207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar