Novice principals setting goals for school improvement in New Zealand

References

• Bandura, A. 2009. “Cultivate Self-efficacy for Personal and Organizational Effectiveness.” In Handbook of Principles of Organization Behavior, edited by E. A. Locke, Vol. 2, 179–200. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., and E. A. Locke. 2003. “Negative Self-efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (1): 87–99. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerema, A. J. 2011. “Challenging and Supporting New Leader Development.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39 (5): 554–567. doi:10.1177/1741143211408451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutus, S., J. W. Fleenor, and J. Tisak. 1999. “Exploring the Link between Rating Congruence and Managerial Effectiveness.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 16 (4): 308–322. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00691.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., L. M. Gomez, A. Grunow, and P. G. LeMahieu. 2015. Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante, R. M., J. A. Nelson, and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2009. “Assessing Schoolwide Cultural Competence: Implications for School Leadership Preparation.” Educational Administration Quarterly 45 (5): 793–827. doi:10.1177/0013161x09347277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. 2011. “Assessment for Learning in the Accountability Era: New Zealand.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Daresh, J., and T. Male. 2000. “Crossing the Border into Leadership: Experiences of Newly Appointed British Headteachers and American Principals.” Educational Management & Administration 28 (1): 89–101. doi:10.1177/0263211x000281013.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., M. LaPointe, D. Meyerson, and M. T. Orr. 2007. Preparing School Leaders for a Changing World: Lessons from Exemplary Leadership Development Programs School Leadership Study. Stanford, CA: Educational Leadership Institute.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., and M. Mattos. 2013. “How Do Principals Really Improve Schools?” The Principalship 70 (7): 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, G. 1996. “Management Problems of New Primary Headteachers.” School Organisation 16 (1): 111–128. doi:10.1080/0260136960160110.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, M. B., D. Liu, T. R. Mitchell, and T. W. Lee. 2013. “Attributions and Emotions as Mediators and/or Moderators in the Goal-striving Process.” In New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance, edited by E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, 35–50. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Y. 2014. “The Timeline of Self-efficacy: Changes During the Professional Life Cycle of School Principals.” Journal of Educational Administration 52 (1): 58–83. doi:10.1108/JEA-09-2012-0103.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, D. C., and J. E. Singer. 1972. “Behavioral Aftereffects of Unpredictable and Uncontrollable Aversive Events.” American Scientist 60 (4): 457–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E. B., and R. Pasternak. 1994. “Principals’ Coordinating Strategies and School Effectiveness.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 5: 239–253. doi: 10.1080/0924345940050303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., L. Curtayne, and G. Burton. 2009. “Executive Coaching Enhances Goal Attainment, Resilience and Workplace Well-being: A Randomised Controlled Study.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 4 (5): 396–407. doi:10.1080/17439760902992456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grogan, M., and R. Andrews. 2002. “Defining Preparation and Professional Development for the Future.” Educational Administration Quarterly 38 (2): 233–256. doi:10.1177/0013161X02382007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and R. H. Heck. 1996. “Reassessing the Principal’s Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980–1995.” Educational Administration Quarterly 32 (1): 5–44. doi:10.1177/0013161X96032001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and R. H. Heck. 2002. “What Do You Call People with Visions? The Role of Vision, Mission and Goals in School Leadership and Improvement.” In Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, edited by K. Leithwood, and P. Hallinger, 9–40. Dodrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1): 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G., and D. Muijs. 2010. “School Leadership Effectiveness: The Growing Insight in the Importance of School Leadership for the Quality and Development of Schools and their Pupils.” In School Leadership-international Perspectives, edited by Huber Stephan G., 57–77. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J. 1975. “The Illusion of Control.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (2): 311. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2008. “Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership.” School Leadership and Management 28 (1): 27–42. doi: 10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B., A. Glaze, and M. Fullan. 2007. “Results without Rancor or Ranking Ontario's Success Story.” Phi Delta Kappan 90 (4): 273–280. doi: 10.1177/003172170809000408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. 2001. “Motivation by Goal Setting.” In Handbook of Organizational Behavior, edited by R. T. Golembiewski, 43–56. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2013a. “Goal Setting Theory, 1990.” In New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance, edited by E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, 3–15. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2013b. New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., K. M. Shaw, L. M. Saari, and G. P. Latham. 1981. “Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980.” Psychological Bulletin 90: 125–152. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, M. J. 2001. “Self-efficacy and Leadership Effectiveness: Applying Social Cognitive Theory to Leadership.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 8 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1177/107179190100800102.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. 2013. “The Architecture of School Improvement.” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (3): 252–263. doi: 10.1108/09578231311311465
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. W., and P. L. Guerra. 2013. “Educator Beliefs and Cultural Knowledge: Implications for School Improvement Efforts.” Educational Administration Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/0013161x13488595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. 2012. “Towards a Conceptualization of the Early Career Stage of Principalship: Current Research, Idiosyncrasies and Future Directions.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 15 (2): 129–151. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2011.640943
   Google Scholar
• Osterman, K., and S. Sullivan. 1996. “New Principals in an Urban Bureaucracy: A Sense of Efficacy.” Journal of School Leadership 6: 661–690. doi: 10.1177/105268469600600605
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff, C., L. E. Atwater, and B. J. Feinberg. 2004. “Understanding Self Other Agreement: A Look at Rater and Ratee Characteristics, Context, and Outcomes.” Personnel Psychology 57: 333–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. 2011. Student-centered Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., C. Lloyd, and K. J. Rowe. 2008. “The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types.” Educational Administration Quarterly 44 (5): 635–674. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnema, C. E. L., and V. M. J. Robinson. 2012. “Goal Setting in Principal Evaluation: Goal Quality and Predictors of Achievement.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 11 (2): 1–33. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2011.629767
   Google Scholar
• St. Germain, L., and D. M. Quinn. 2006. “Investigation of Tacit Knowledge in Principal Leadership.” The Educational Forum 70 (1): 75–90. doi: 10.1080/00131720508984873
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., and K. Leithwood. 2015. “Direction-setting School Leadership Practices: A Meta-analytical Review of Evidence about their Influence.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (4): 499–523. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and C. R. Gareis. 2004. “Principals’ Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a Promising Construct.” Journal of Educational Administration 42 (5): 573–585. doi: 10.1108/09578230410554070
   Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R. P., and R. J. Anderson. 2009. “Agreement in Self–Other Ratings of Leader Effectiveness: The Role of Demographics and Personality.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment 17: 165–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, S. 2006. Mentoring and Induction Programs That Support New Principals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A., and H. Qian. 2006. “Beginning Principals: Balancing at the Top of the Greasy Pole.” Journal of Educational Administration 44 (4): 297–309. doi: 10.1108/09578230610674921
   Google Scholar
• Winters, D. C., and G. P. Latham. 1996. “The Effect of Learning Versus Outcome Goals on a Simple Versus a Complex Task.” Group & Organization Management 21 (2): 236–250. doi: 10.1177/1059601196212007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar