What information do principals consider when evaluating teachers?

References

• Blasé, R., J. Blasé, and D. Y. Phillips. 2010. Handbook of School Improvement: How High-Performing Principals Create High-Performing Schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., P. Grossman, M. Ing, H. Lankford, and J. Wyckoff. 2011. “The Influence of School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (2): 303–333. doi: 10.3102/0002831210380788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Educational Leadership. 2017. 5 Dimensions of Teaching and Learning. University of Washington. https://www.k-12leadership.org/content/service/5-dimensions-of-teaching-and-learning.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2005. “Shaping Teacher Sensemaking: School Leaders and the Enactment of Reading Policy.” Educational Policy 19 (3): 476–509. doi: 10.1177/0895904805276143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubberley, E. 1929. Public School Administration. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. 2007. Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., A. E. Wise, and S. R. Pease. 1983. “Teacher Evaluation in the Organizational Context: A Review of the Literature.” Review of Educational Research 53 (3): 285–328. doi: 10.3102/00346543053003285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L. 2009. So long, Lake Wobegon? Using teacher evaluation to raise teacher quality. https://www.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/issues/2009/06/pdf/teacher_evaluation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L., and R. J. Stiggins. 1986. Teacher Evaluation: Five Keys to Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Educational Association.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L., and R. J. Stiggins. 1990. “Beyond Minimum Competence: Evaluation for Professional Development.” In The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Techers, edited by J. Millman, and L. Darling-Hammond, 116–132. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganon-Shilon, S., and C. Schechter. 2017. “Making Sense of School Leaders’ Sense-Making.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45 (4): 682–698. doi: 10.1177/1741143216628536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., J. A. Grissom, M. Ruben, C. M. Neumerski, M. Cannata, T. Drake, and P. Schuermann. 2015. “Make Room Value Added: Principals’ Human Capital Decisions and the Emergence of Teacher Observation Data.” Educational Researcher 44 (2): 96–104. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15575031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 105–117. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., C. Kelley, and S. Kimball. 2004. “Implementing Teacher Evaluation Systems: How Principals Make Sense of Complex Artifacts to Shape Local Instructional Practice.” In Theory and Research in Educational Administration, edited by C. Miskel, and W. Hoy, 66–90. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., and L. Lefgren. 2008. “Can Principals Identify Effective Teachers? Evidence on Subjective Performance Evaluation in Education.” Journal of Labor Economics 26 (1): 101–136. doi: 10.1086/522974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesler, V. A., and C. Howe. 2015. “Teacher Evaluation in Michigan.” In Improving Teacher Evaluation Systems, edited by J. A. Grissom, and P. Youngs, 156–168. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koyama, J. 2014. “Principals as Bricoleurs: Making Sense and Making do in an era of Accountability.” Educational Administration Quarterly 50 (2): 279–304. doi: 10.1177/0013161X13492796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., and A. F. Gilmour. 2016. “Can Principals Promote Teacher Development as Evaluators? A Case Study of Principals’ Views and Experiences.” Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (5): 711–753. doi: 10.1177/0013161X16653445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. 2011. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Working Conditions: How Predictive of Planned and Actual Teacher Movement?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33 (2): 235–261. doi: 10.3102/0162373711398128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2008. “Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership.” School Leadership & Management 28 (1): 27–42. doi: 10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1971. “Street-level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 6 (4): 391–409. doi: 10.1177/107808747100600401
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., S. Bush-Mecenas, K. O. Strunk, J. A. Lincove, and A. Huguet. 2017. “Evaluating Teachers in the Big Easy: How Organizational Context Shapes Policy Responses in New Orleans.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 39 (4): 539–570. doi: 10.3102/0162373717698221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Marzano Center. 2017. The Marzano Focused Teacher Evaluation Model. White Paper. http://www.marzanocenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/MC06-14-Focus-Eval-Model-White-Paper-NEW-CUST-080817.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. 2015. Educator Evaluations. http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,4615,7-140-5683_75438—,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Teachers for the 21st Century: Using Evaluation to Improve Teaching. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P., and S. M. Johnson. 2012. “Is PAR a Good Investment? Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Teacher Peer Assistance and Review Programs.” Educational Policy 26 (5): 696–729. doi: 10.1177/0895904811417584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A., P. Youngs, and A. Odden. 2001. Advances in Teacher Assessments and Their Uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching 4th ed., 259–297, Washington, D.C.: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. 2015. “Principals’ Sensemaking and Enactment of Teacher Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Administration 53 (3): 374–392. doi: 10.1108/JEA-04-2014-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver Strong & Associates. 2014. The Thoughtful Classroom Teacher Effectiveness Framework. Thoughtful Education Press. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtfulclassroom.com/PDFs/TCTEF/TCTEF_Basic_Rubric.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., L. M. Parise, and J. Z. Sherer. 2011. “Organizational Routines as Coupling Mechanisms: Policy, School Administration, and the Technical Core.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (3): 586–619. doi: 10.3102/0002831210385102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. P., and M. L. Donaldson. 2016. “The new Educational Accountability: Understanding the Landscape of Teacher Evaluation in the Post-NCLB era.” Education Finance and Policy 11 (3): 340–359. doi: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. 2009. Race to the Top Program Executive Summary. http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherley, R., and M. Lipsky. 1977. “Street-level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special Education Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 47 (2): 171–197. doi: 10.17763/haer.47.2.v870r1v16786270x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. E., L. Darling-Hammond, M. W. McLaughlin, and H. T. Bernstein. 1985. “Teacher Evaluation: A Study of Effective Practices.” The Elementary School Journal 86 (1): 60–121. doi: 10.1086/461437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2013. Case Study Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar