Incorporating time demands into studies of principal time use

References

• Barnes, C. A., E. Camburn, B. R. Sanders, and J. Sebastian. 2010. “Developing Instructional Leaders: Using Mixed Methods to Explore the Black Box of Planned Change in Principals’ Professional Practice.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (2): 241–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, G. 1925. “Functions of the Elementary School Principal.” Journal of Educational Method 4: 178–184.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., B. Rowan, and J. E. Taylor. 2003. “Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25 (4): 347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., J. P. Spillane, and J. Sebastian. 2010. “Assessing the Utility of a Daily Log for Measuring Principal Leadership Practice.” Educational Administration Quarterly 46 (5): 707–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, V., and J. B. Jimerson. 2017. “Managing Digital Identity on Twitter.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45 (5): 884–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowson, R. L., and C. Porter-Gehrie. 1980. “The Discretionary Behavior of Principals in Large-City Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 16 (1): 45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. O. 1921. “The Duties of High-School Principals.” The School Review 29 (5): 337–350.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L. 2015. Leadership for Low-Performing Schools: A Step-by-Step Guide to the School Turnaround Process. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Eargle, J. C. 2013. “I’m Not a Bystander: Developing Teacher Leadership in a Rural School-University Collaboration.” Rural Educator 35 (1): 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, I. V. 1927. “The Duties of the Elementary-School Principal.” The Elementary School Journal 27 (6): 414–422.
   Google Scholar
• Gaziel, H. 1995. “Managerial Work Patterns of Principals at High- and Average-Performing Israeli Elementary Schools.” The Elementary School Journal 96 (2): 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., J. Grissom, C. M. Neumerski, J. Murphy, and R. Blissett. 2015. Making Time for Instructional Leadership. Volume: 1: The Evolution of the SAM Process. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., J. Huff, H. May, and E. Camburn. 2008. “School Context and Individual Characteristics: What Influences Principal Practice?” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (3): 332–352.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., S. Loeb, and B. Master. 2013. “Effective Instructional Time Use for School Leaders: Longitudinal Evidence from Observations of Principals.” Educational Researcher 42 (8): 433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., S. Loeb, and H. Mitani. 2015. “Principal Time Management Skills: Explaining Patterns in Principals’ Time Use, Job Stress, and Perceived Effectiveness.” Journal of Educational Administration 53 (6): 773–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. 2000. “Distributed Properties: A New Architecture for Leadership.” Educational Management & Administration 28 (3): 317–338.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D. 2000. “The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on the Work of School Principals.” Leading & Managing 6 (1): 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and R. H. Heck. 1998. “Exploring the Principal’s Contribution to School Effectiveness: 1980–1995.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 9: 157–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and J. Murphy. 1985. “Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals.” The Elementary School Journal 86 (2): 217–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2008. “Distributed Leadership: According to the Evidence.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (2): 172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., W. K. Ingle, and S. A. Rutledge. 2014. “How Teacher Evaluation Methods Matter for Accountability: A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings by Principals and Teacher Value-Added Measures.” American Educational Research Journal 51 (1): 73–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, M. F., and W. A. Firestone. 1995. “Who’s in Charge Here? Sources of Leadership for Change in Eight Schools.” The Elementary School Journal 96 (1): 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, D. H., and P. D. Tucker. 2016. “Systematic Review of Key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement: A Unified Framework.” Review of Educational Research 86 (2): 531–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochbein, C. 2020. “You’ve Got Email.” Educational Leadership 77: 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hochbein, C., B. V. Dever, G. White, L. Mayger, and E. Gallagher. 2018. “Confronting Methodological Challenges in Studying School Leader Time Use Through Technological Advancements: A Pilot Study.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (4): 659–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, E. L., D. Klasik, and S. Loeb. 2010. “Principal’s Time Use and School Effectiveness.” American Journal of Education 116 (4): 491–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., C. Hochbein, and J. Simons. 2020. “The Relationship among School Contexts, Principal Time Use, School Climate, and Student Achievement.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 48 (2): 305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., H. Gehlbach, M. Greenberg, D. Quinn, and D. Thal. 2015. The Best Foot Forward Project: Substituting Teacher-Collected Video for in-Person Classroom Observations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for Educational Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, M., M. A. Gooden, and J. E. Davis. 2016. “Culturally Responsive School Leadership: A Synthesis of the Literature.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 1272–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmetz, J. T., and D. J. Willower. 1982. “Elementary School Principals’ Work Behavior.” Educational Administration Quarterly 18 (4): 62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehny, M. S. 1925. “The Effect of Daily Schedules or Programs.” Bulletin, Department of Elementary School Principals 5 (1): 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne, H. J., K. Shakman, J. Zweig, and S. L. Greller. 2016. Principals’ Time, Tasks, and Professional Development: An Analysis of Schools and Staffing Survey Data (REL 2017-201). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. A., and A. Datnow. 2012. “The Principal Role in Data Driven Decision Making: Using Case Study Data to Develop Multi-Mediator Models of Educational Reform.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (2): 179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, W. J., and D. J. Willower. 1981. “The Managerial Behavior of High School Principals.” Educational Administration Quarterly 17 (1): 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., and W. L. Gardner. 1983. An Executive Summary of the Behavior of High Performing Educational Managers: An Observational Study. Tallahasse, FL: Department of Management, College of Business, Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• May, H., J. Huff, and E. Goldring. 2012. “A Longitudinal Study of Principals’ Activities and Student Performance.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23 (4): 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, H., and J. A. Supovitz. 2011. “The Scope of Principal Efforts to Improve Instruction.” Educational Administration Quarterly 47 (2): 332–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurry, F. M. 1913. Elementary School Standards. New York, NY: World Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H., and A. M. MacLellan. 2002. “School Improvement Plans in Elementary and Middle Schools on Probation.” The Elementary School Journal 102 (4): 275–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H., A. M. MacLellan, and M. F. Quintero. 2001. “School Improvement Plans in Schools on Probation: A Comparative Content Analysis Across Three Accountability Systems.” Educational Administration Quarterly 37 (2): 197–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, V. C., R. Crowson, E. Hurwitz, and C. Porter-Gehrie. 1982. “The Urban Principal: Middle Manager in the Educational Bureaucracy.” Phi Delta Kappan 63 (10): 689–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. 2010. The Educator’s Handbook for Understanding and Closing Achievement Gaps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. M. 2013. “Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review: What Do We Know about Principal, Teacher, and Coach Instructional Leadership, and Where Should We Go from Here?” Educational Administration Quarterly 49 (2): 310–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P., and M. A. Kraft. 2016. “The Productivity Costs of Inefficient Hiring Practices: Evidence from Late Teacher Hiring.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 35 (4): 791–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D. 1977. “The Principal’s Tasks.” Administrator’s Notebook 26 (8): 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, K. 2014. Principals’ Work in Contemporary Times: Final Report. London: The University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, K., and D. C. Hauseman. 2019. “The Use of Email and Principals’ Work: A Double-Edged Sword.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 18 (3): 382–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousmaniere, K. 2013. The Principal’s Office: A Social History of the American School Principal. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, P. S. 2007. “The Professional Development Needs of Rural High School Principals: A Seven-State Study.” Rural Educator 28 (3): 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., C. Poortman, H. Luyten, and J. Ebbeler. 2017. “Factors Promoting and Hindering Data-Based Decision Making in Schools.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 28 (2): 242–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C., S. Ahadi, and S. Krug. 1990. An Experience Sampling Approach to the Study of Principal Instructional Leadership II: A Comparison of Activities and Beliefs as Basis for Understanding Effective School Leadership. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign University High Laboratory School.
   Google Scholar
• Sebstian, J., E. M. Camburn, and J. P. Spillane. 2018. “Portraits of Principal Practice: Time Allocation and School Principal Work.” Educational Administration Quarterly 54 (1): 47–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review 63 (2): 129–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., E. M. Camburn, J. Pustejovsky, A. S. Pareja, and G. Lewis. 2008. “Taking a Distributed Perspective: Epistemological and Methodological Tradeoffs in Operationalizing the Leader-Plus Aspect.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (2): 189–213.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., E. M. Camburn, and A. Stitziel Pareja. 2007. “Taking a Distributed Perspective to the School Principal's Workday.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 6 (1): 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., and A. Zuberi. 2009. “Designing and Piloting a Leadership Daily Practice Log: Using Logs to Study the Practice of Leadership.” Educational Administration Quarterly 45: 375–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller, N., and W. Graves. 1953. “Principals Study Their Jobs.” National Elementary Principal 33 (2): 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O., J. A. Marsh, S. C. Bush-Mecenas, and M. R. Duque. 2016. “The Best Laid Plans: An Examination of School Plan Quality and Implementation in a School Improvement Initiative.” Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (2): 259–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, M., M. Risku, and K. Collin. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of Distributed Leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory Development, Empirical Evidence and Future Research Focus.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 44 (1): 146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wethayanugoon, A. 1996. “A Qualitative Study of the Managerial Behavior of K-12 Attendance Center Principals.” Unpublished Dissertation. Mississippi State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wimpelberg, R. K., C. Teddlie, and S. Stringfield. 1989. “Sensitivity to Context: The Past and Future of Effective Schools Research.” Educational Administration Quarterly 25 (1): 82–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. 1973. The Man in the Principal’s Office: An Ethnography. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar