Ready for reform? Narratives of accountability from teachers and education leaders in Wales

References

• Altrichter, H., and D. Kemethofer. 2015. “Does Accountability Pressure Through School Inspections Promote School Improvement?” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (1): 32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdur, L., and I. Mero-Jaffe. 2017. “Interrelations Between Policymakers’ Intentions and School Agents’ Interpretation of Accountability Policy in Israel.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3016. (Accessed July 20 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., and V. Phillips. 2000. “Big Change Questions. “Should Large-Scale Assessment be Used for Accountability?”–The Fusion of Pressure and Support.” Journal of Educational Change 1 (3): 277–281.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2010. Good Education in an Age of Measurement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bold, C. 2012. Using Narrative in Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., and D. Zhang. 2017. “Accounting for Discrepancies in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Evidence use and Actual Instances of Evidence use in Schools.” Cambridge Journal of Education 47 (2): 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, K., and L. Sadeghi. 2015. “Teacher Perceptions of the Value of Teacher Evaluations: New Jersey’s ACHIEVE NJ.” International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation 10 (21): 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J. 2016. Engaging in Narrative Inquiry. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Close, P. 2016. “‘System Leader’ Consultancy Development in English Schools: A Long-Term Agenda for a Democratic Future?” School Leadership & Management 36 (1): 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close, P., A. Kendrick, and D. Outhwaite. 2018. “Developing System Leaders: A Research Engagement approach.” Management in Education 32 (2): 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. 2002. Narratives and Fictions in Educational Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., M. Cummings Carney, E. Stringer Keefe, S. Burton, W. Chang, M. Fernandez, A. Miller, J. Sanchez, and M. Baker. 2018. Reclaiming Accountability in Teacher Education. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Counsell, S., and B. Wright. 2018. “High-Stakes Accountability Systems: Creating Cultures of Fear.” Global Education Review 5 (2): 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cribb, A., and S. Gewirtz. 2007. “Unpacking Autonomy and Control in Education: Some Conceptual and Normative Groundwork for a Comparative analysis.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (3): 203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2004. Narratives in Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, P. 2016. Testing Times: Success, Failure and Fiasco in Education Policy in Wales Since Devolution. Cardiff: Welsh Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. 2015. Successful Futures. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. 2018. A Learning Inspectorate. Cardiff: Estyn.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, K., D. Fries, M. Martin-Glenn, and B. Douglas. 2007. “Accountability Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Superintendent, Principal and Teacher perceptions.” International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership 2 (4): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Estyn. 2015. Improving schools through regional educational consortia. Cardiff: Estyn.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, D. 2016. Trust and Verify: The Real Keys to School Improvement. London: UCL, IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2014. The Principal: Three Keys to Maximising Impact. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grinshtain, Y., and D. Gibton. 2018. “Responsibility, Authority, and Accountability in School-Based and non-School Based Management: Principals’ Coping Strategies.” Journal of Educational Administration 56 (1): 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J., and J. Holstein. 2009. Analyzing Narrative Reality. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and D. Shirley. 2012. The Global Fourth Way: The Quest for Educational Excellence. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hazle-Bussey, L., J. Welch, and M. Mohammed. 2014. “Effective Consultants: A Conceptual Framework for Helping School Systems Achieve Systemic reform.” School Leadership & Management 34 (2): 156–178.
   Google Scholar
• Heystek, J. 2014. “Principals' perceptions about performance agreements as motivational action: Evidence from South Africa.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 42 (6): 889–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2018. “Conceptions of Responsibility Within and Beyond Neoliberal Frames: A Story of Leadership in an English Primary school.” Educational Management and Leadership 46 (1): 124–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J., and B. Algozzine. 2006. “Perceptions of the Impact of Accountability on the Role of Principals.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 14. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n16.2006. (Accessed July 31 2018).
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., J. O’Brien, and P. Gronn. 2012. “Drowning or Waving? Coping Strategies among Scottish Head teachers.” School Leadership and Management 32 (5): 421–437.
   Google Scholar
• Matteucci, M., D. Guglielmi, and F. Lauermann. 2017. “Teachers’ Sense of Responsibility for Educational Outcomes and its Associations with Teachers’ Instructional Approaches and Professional Wellbeing.” Social Psychology of Education 20: 275–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. “The Welsh Education Reform Journey: A Rapid Policy Assessment. [Online].” Accessed April 12 2019. http://www.oecd.org/education/The-Welsh-Education-Reform-Journey-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pizmony-Levy, O., and A. Woolsey. 2017. “‘Politics of Education and Teachers’ Support for High-Stakes Teacher Accountability Policies.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25 (87). doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2892. Accessed July 18 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, K., and S. Winton. 2015. “Juggling Multiple Accountability Systems: how Three Principals Manage These Tensions in Ontario, Canada.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 28 (4): 323–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S. 2000. “Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in an era of reform.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 66 (1): 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki, E., N. Segool, L. Pendergast, and N. Von der Embse. 2018. “The Influence of Test-Based Accountability Policies on Early Elementary Teachers: School Climate, Environmental Stress, and Teacher stress.” Psychology in the Schools 55: 391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2015. Finnish Lessons 2.0. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Shirrel, M. 2016. “New Principals, Accountability, and Commitment in low-Performing schools.” Journal of Educational Administration 54 (5): 558–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stosich, E. 2018. “Principals and Teachers ‘Craft Coherence’ among Accountability policies.” Journal of Educational Administration 56 (2): 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedberg, L. 2016. “Sweden: A Postmodern Cocktail.” In Trust and Verify: The Real Keys to School Improvement, edited by D. Fink. London: UCL, IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, C., S. Schweizer, and J. Bellmann. 2017. “Rethinking Side Effects of Accountability in Education: Insights from a Multiple Methods Study in Four German School systems.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25 (93). doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2662. (Accessed July 31 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. 2013. “NAPLAN, MySchool and Accountability: Teacher Perceptions of the Effects of testing.” The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 12 (2): 62–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, Department for Education and Skills. 2014. National Standards for Challenge Advisers. Accessed July 17 2019. https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2018-03/national-standards-for-challenge-advisers.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Wales, The Education Directorate. 2017. Our National Mission. Accessed April 12 2019. https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2018-03/education-in-wales-our-national-mission.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, The Education Directorate. 2018. Developing Robust Evaluation and Accountability Arrangements to Support a Self-Improving System. [Welsh Government one-day Conference for Head Teachers]. 18 March 18.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, The Education Directorate. 2020. The National Evaluation and Improvement Resource (NEIR): Update and Guidance. Accessed March 3 2021. https://hwb.gov.wales/api/storage/cf4361b8-bb36-47ac-ab41-7f0f2d081d0a/update-and-action-plan-english.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A., and J. Ko. 2011. “Principal Leadership in an era of Accountability: A Perspective from the Hong Kong context.” School Leadership and Management 31 (4): 369–392.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M., M. Jones, and A. MacDonald. 2018. Teaching: A Valued Profession. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, W., and P. Mertova. 2007. Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• West, D., C. Peck, U. Reitzug, and E. Crane. 2014. “Accountability, Autonomy and Stress: Principal Responses to Superintendent Change in a Large US Urban School district.” School Leadership and Management 34 (4): 372–391.
   Google Scholar