Dutch boards governing multiple schools: navigating between autonomy and expectations

References

• Alsbury, T. L. 2008. “School Board Member and Superintendent Turnover and the Influence on Student Achievement: An Application of the Dissatisfaction Theory.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 7 (2): 202–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bannink, D., and W. Trommel. 2019. “Intelligent Modes of Imperfect Governance.” Policy and Society 38 (2): 198–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, J. 2006. Boards That Make a Difference: A New Design for Leadership in Nonprofit and Public Organizations. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2001. “Collective Sensemaking About Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23 (2): 145–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2004. “Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the Relationship Between the Institutional Environment and the Classroom.” Sociology of Education 77 (July): 211–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2014. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2008. De bestuurlijke ontwikkeling van het Nederlandse onderwijs [Development of Governing Practices in Dutch Education]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2009. Minimum leerresultaten, interventie en intern toezicht [Minimum Standards, Intervention and Internal Supervision]. Onderwijsraad: Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2010a. Verzelfstandiging in het Onderwijs I [Privatization in Education I]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2010b. Verzelfstandiging in het Onderwijs II [Privatization in Education II]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2012. Geregelde Ruimte [Regulated Space]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2015. Kwaliteit in het Hoger Onderwijs [Quality in Higher Education]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2017. Decentraal onderwijsbeleid bij de tijd [Bringing Local and Regional Policies Up-to-Date]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2018. Een krachtige rol voor de schoolleider [Empowering School Heads]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. 2019. Onderwijsvrijheid en overheidszorg. Spanning in artikel 23 [Freedom of Education and Government Responsibility. Tensions within Article 23]. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C., M. Honingh, E. Hooge, and J. O’Hara. 2016. “Changing School Board Governance in Primary Education Through School Inspections.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 44 (2): 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2007. School Autonomy in Europe. Policies and Measures. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• French, P. E., G. L. Peevely, and R. E. Stanley. 2008. “Measuring Perceived School Board Effectiveness in Tennessee: The Latest Survey Results.” International Journal of Public Administration 31 (2): 211–243.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2001. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 1994. Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teacher’s Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. and M.S. Jones. 2017.“Observations on the ‘Dutch Way’ Observations and Future Directions.” In The Dutch Way in Education. Teach, Learn, and Lead the Dutch Way, edited by E. Hooge, 229–237. Helmond: Onderwijs maak je samen.
   Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, K. 2020. “The Multidimensionality of Conflict in Supervisory Boards in Education in the Netherlands.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 48 (3): 549–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijsters, L., S. Van der Ploeg, and S. Weijers. 2020. Dorpschool of Leerfabriek? [Village School or Learning Factory]. Oberon: Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M., and O. Meeks. 2010. School Boards Circa 2010: Governance in the Accountability Era. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., M. Ehren, and C. Van Montfort. 2018. “Het vernieuwde toezicht in het onderwijs. Hooggespannen verwachtingen van kwaliteitszorg, bestuurskracht en maatwerk [The Renewed Inspection in Education. High Expectations of Quality Assurances, Administrative Power and Customization].” Bestuurskunde 27 (4): 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., M. Ehren, C. Van Montfort, R. Blom, M. Van Genugten, and V. De Gooyert. 2020a. Effectstudie van het Vernieuwde Onderwijstoezicht [Study into the Effect of the Renewed Approach of the Inspectorate]. Nijmegen: Institute for Management Research.
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., M. Ruiter, and S. Van Thiel. 2020. “Are School Boards and Educational Quality Related? Results of an International Literature Review.” Educational Review 72 (2): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honingh, M. and L. Stevenson. 2020. Besturen van onderwijs. Acquis over besturen van onderwijs in opdracht van de Onderwijsraad [Governing Education. Acquis on the Governance of Education for the Education Council]. Nijmegen: Institute of Management Research.
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., and M. Van Genugten. 2014. Monitorstudie Goed Onderwijsbestuur in het VO [Study Good Educational Governance in Secondary Education]. Nijmegen: Institute of Management Research.
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., M. Van Genugten, S. Van Thiel, and R. Blom. 2020b. “Do Boards Matter? Studying the Relation Between School Boards and Educational Quality.” Public Policy and Administration 35 (1): 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, E. 2013. Besturing van Autonomie. Over de mythe van bestuurbare onderwijsorganisaties. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Hooge, E. 2017. Freedom of Education as an Interplay of Forces. The Dutch Way in Education. Teach, Learn, and Lead the Dutch Way (pp. 29–40). Helmond: Onderwijs maak je samen.
   Google Scholar
• Hooge, E., and M. Honingh. 2014. “Are School Boards Aware of the Educational Quality of Their Schools?” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 42 (4S): 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, S. 1999. “Neoliberal Education Reform in the Netherlands.” Comparative Education 35 (3): 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, D. 2002. “Local School Boards Under Review: Their Role and Effectiveness in Relation to Students’ Academic Achievement.” Review of Educational Research 72 (2): 229–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2008. “Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership.” School Leadership and Management 28 (1): 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2019. “Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership Revisited.” School Leadership and Management 40 (1): 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey and Company. 2020. Een verstevigd fundament voor iedereen. Een onderzoek naar de doelmatigheid en toereikendheid van het funderend onderwijs [A Strengthened Base for Everyone. A Research into the Efficiency and Adequacy of Primary and Secondary Education]. McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mentink, D., and B.P, Vermeulen. 2001. Artikel 23 grondwet: Tekst en toelichting op het onderwijsartikel in de grondwet [Section 23 Constitution: Text and Explanation of the Education Section of the Constitution]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. D., and B. Rowan. 2012. The New Institutionalism in Education. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neeleman, A. 2019a. School Autonomy in Practice. School Intervention Decision-Making by Dutch Secondary School Leaders. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Neeleman, A. 2019b. “The Scope of School Autonomy in Practice: An Empirically Based Classification of School Interventions.” Journal of Educational Change 20 (1): 31–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9332-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, M., M. Honingh, and F. Geijsel. 2020. “De juridische positie van de schoolleider nader beschouwd [Considerations on the Legal Position of School Leaders].” Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijsrecht en Onderwijsbeleid 2: 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. Education Policy Outlook Netherlands. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Foundations for the Future. Reviews of National Policies for Education. The Netherlands. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Indicator D6 Who Makes Key Decisions in Education Systems? In Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Onderwijs in cijfers. 2019. Besturen in primair onderwijs. Kengetallen in het primair onderwijs [Boards in Primary Education. Core Numbers on Primary Education]. https://www.onderwijsincijfers.nl/kengetallen/po/instellingen/aantallen-instellingen-po.
   Google Scholar
• Orton, J. D., and K. E. Weick. 1990. “Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization.” Academy of Management Review 15 (2): 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piot, L., and G. Kelchtermans. 2015. “The Micropolitics of Distributed Leadership: Four Case Studies of School Federations.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 44 (4): 632–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plough, B. L. 2011. “School Board Governance and Student Achievement: School Board Members’ Perceptions of Their Behaviors and Beliefs.” Dissertation. San Diego State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pont, B., D. Nusche, and H. Moorman. 2008. Improving School Leadership, Volume 1: Policy and Practice. Australia: OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ranson, C., C. Farrell, N. Peim, and And P. Smith. 2005. “Does Governance Matter for School Improvement?” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16 (3): 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, D., M. Delagardelle, M. Buckton, C. Jons, W. Lueders, M. J. Vens, B. Joyce, J. Wolf, and J. Weathersby. 2001. The Lighthouse Inquiry: School Board/ Superintendent Team Behaviors in School Districts with Extreme Differences in Student Achievement. Des Moines: Iowa Association of Boards.
   Google Scholar
• Saatcioglu, A., S. Moores, G. Sarkut, and A. Bajaj. 2011. “The Role of School Board Social Capital in District Governance: Effects on Financial and Academic Outcomes.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 10 (1): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. 2015. “Theories on Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 (1): 10–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. 2002. “Issues in Conducting and Studying Large-Scale Educational Reform.” Journal of Educational Change 3 (1): 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Bruggencate, G. 2009. Maken schoolleiders het verschil? Onderzoek naar de invloed van schoolleiders op de schoolresultaten [Do School Leaders Make the Difference? Research into the Influence of School Leaders on School Outcomes]. Enschede: Twente University.
   Google Scholar
• Turkenburg, M. 2008. De school bestuurd [The School Governed]. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., and J. Verheij. 2013. Verzelfstandiging in het openbaar basisonderwijs in Nederland: respondentenrapport van een onderzoek onder 157 gemeenten en 621 scholen. Nijmegen: Radboud University: Institute for Management reserach.
   Google Scholar
• Van Twist, M., M. Van der Steen, M. Kleiboer, J. Scherpenisse, and H. Theissens. 2013. Coping with Very Weak Primary Schools: Towards Smart Interventions in Dutch Education Policy. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• VO Raad. n.d. Besturen naar aantal vestigingen [Boards and the Number of Schools Governed]. Accessed December 16, 2020. https://www.vo-raad.nl/vo-in-cijfers-scholen.
   Google Scholar
• Waslander, S. 2010. “Government, School Autonomy, and Legitimacy: Why the Dutch Government is Adopting an Unprecedented Level of Interference with Independent Schools.” Journal of School Choice 4 (4): 398–417.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations [Foundations for Organizational Science]. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. 2015. “Professionalizing School Governance: The Disciplinary Effects of School Autonomy and Inspection on the Changing Role of School Governors.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (2): 182–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.941414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar