‘Intersectional collaboration’: a new form of leadership from the WomenEd movement

References

• Acker, J. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4 (2): 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. 2006. “Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations.” Gender & Society 20 (4): 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. 2012. “Gendered Organizations and Intersectionality: Problems and Possibilities.” An International Journal 31 (3): 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151211209072.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A. 2009. “Gender and Power.” In The SAGE Handbook of Power. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom, edited by S. Clegg and M. Haugaard, 293–309. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021014.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. L. Ashcraft. 2010. “Critical Methodology in Management and Organisational Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by D. A. Buchanan and A. Bryman, 61–77. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and Hugh Willmott, eds. 1992. Critical Management Studies, 230. Newbury Park, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 2002. “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual.” Journal of Management Studies 39 (5): 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amis, J. M., J. Mair, and K. A. Munir. 2020. “The Organizational Reproduction of Inequality.” Academy of Management Annals 14 (1): 195–230. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., Susan Meriläinen, Scott Taylor, and Janne Tienari. 2019. “‘Time’s up! Feminist Theory and Activism Meets Organization Studies’.” Human Relations 72 (1): 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., and E. Wray-Bliss. 2009. “Research Ethics: Regulations and Responsibilities.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by D. A. Buchanan and A. Bryman, 77–92. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. 2013. “A Feminist Critical Perspective on Educational Leadership.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 16 (2): 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2012.754057.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2021. “One Size Fits all? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 (3): 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. International Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge (Routledge classics).
   Google Scholar
• Calas, M., and L. Smircich. 2010. “Feminist Perspectives on Gender in Organizational Research: What is and is Yet to be.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by D. A. Buchanan and A. Bryman, 246–269. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creed, W. E. D., R. Dejordy, and J. Lok. 2010. “Being the Change: Resolving Institutional Contradiction Through Identity Work.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1336–1364. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creed, W. E. D., Barbara Gray, Markus A. Höllerer, Charlotte M. Karam, and Trish Reay. 2022. “Organizing for Social and Institutional Change in Response to Disruption, Division, and Displacement: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Organization Studies 43 (10): 1535–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221122237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, K., and V. Porritt. (eds) 2021. Being 10% Braver. London: CORWIN, a Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T., and H. M. Gunter. 2008. “Contesting the Orthodoxy of Teacher Leadership.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 11 (4): 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120802317883.
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M., and A. Pullen. 2023. “Feminist Theories and Activist Practices in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 45 (4): 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231209861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2019. “Theorizing Affective Ethnography for Organization Studies.” Organization 26 (6): 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418805285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B. 2023. “A Call for Activist Scholarship in Organizational Theorizing.” Journal of Management Inquiry 32 (3): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231169160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., and M. J. Ventresca. 2006. “Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s ‘Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy.” Theory and Society 35 (2): 213–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2013. “Distributed Leadership: Friend or Foe?” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 41 (5): 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., M. Jones, and N. Ismail. 2022. “Distributed Leadership: Taking a Retrospective and Contemporary View of the Evidence Base.” School Leadership & Management 42 (5): 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heucher, K., Elisa Alt, Sara Soderstrom, Maureen Scully, and Ante Glavas. 2024. “Catalyzing Action on Social and Environmental Challenges: An Integrative Review of Insider Social Change Agents.” Academy of Management Annals 18 (1): 295–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2022.0205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. X., Margaret Bearman, David Boud, and Flemming Konradsen. 2022. “Digital Ethnography in Higher Education Teaching and Learning—A Methodological Review.” Higher Education 84 (5): 1143–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00838-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardner, Y. 2022. “Leadership, Race and Positive Professional Identity: Exploring the Black Experience.” In Tell me Something Good: Enabling Conditions for Positive Individual Outcomes Symposium, Creating a Better World Together, 82nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM). Seattle, Washington, USA, 5-9 August 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., and S. Buchanan. 2017. “Power, Institutions and Organizations.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. 55 City Road, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, and R. Meyer, 477–506. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526415066.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., and N. Phillips. 2019. Constructing Organizational Life: How Social-Symbolic Work Shapes Selves, Organizations, and Institutions. 1st ed., 1–394. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lok, J., W. E. D. Creed, R. DeJordy, M. Voronov. 2017. “Living Institutions: Bringing Emotions Into Organizational Institutionalism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, 591–620. London: SAGE publications..
   Google Scholar
• Lund, R. 2012. “Publishing to Become an ‘Ideal Academic’: An Institutional Ethnography and a Feminist Critique.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 28 (3): 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, F., M. Kenny, and L. Chappell. 2010. “New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?” International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110388788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluney, C. L., and V. C. Rabelo. 2019. “‘Conditions of Visibility: An Intersectional Examination of Black Women’s Belongingness and Distinctiveness at Work’.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 113:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mifsud, D. 2017. “Distribution Dilemmas: Exploring the Presence of a Tension Between Democracy and Autocracy Within a Distributed Leadership Scenario.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45 (6): 978–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216653974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulholland, M, Natalie Arnett, Emma Knights, and Vivienne Porritt. 2021. Closing the Gender Pay Gap in Education: A Leadership Imperative. White Paper. https://www.nga.org.uk/Knowledge-Centre/research/Closing-the-gender-pay-gap-in-education.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Novicevic, Milorad M., John H. Humphreys, Ifeoluwa T. Popoola, Stephen Poor, Robert Gigliotti, Brandon Randolph-Seng. 2017. Collective Leadership as Institutional Work: Interpreting Evidence from Mound Bayou.” Leadership 13: 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715016642510.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., and E. G. Foldy. 2016. “Collective Dimensions of Leadership.” In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, edited by A. Farazmand, 1–6. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2202-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., Erica Gabrielle Foldy, Gail T Fairhurst, and Brad Jackson. 2020. “Collective Dimensions of Leadership: Connecting Theory and Method.” Human Relations 73 (4): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719899714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyakawa, M., E. McKenna, and H. Han. 2021. “Habits of Courage: Reconceptualizing Risk in Social Movement Organizing.” Journal of Community Psychology 49 (8): 3101–3121. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porritt, V., and K. Featherstone (eds). 2019. 10% Braver: Inspiring Women to Lead Education. 1st edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, P., and A. Prasad. 2000. “Stretching the Iron Cage: The Constitution and Implications of Routine Workplace Resistance.” Organization Science 11 (4): 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.387.14597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. K., Evangelina Holvino, Joyce K. Fletcher, and Stella M. Nkomo. 2016. “The Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go from Here?.” Gender, Work & Organization 23 (3): 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., T. Morris, and R. Greenwood. 2012. “From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change.” Academy of Management Journal 55 (4): 877–904. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolović Jones, S., N. Winchester, and C. Clarke. 2021. “‘Feminist Solidarity Building as Embodied Agonism: An Ethnographic Account of a Protest Movement.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (3): 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. 2005. “Distributed Leadership.” The Educational Forum 69 (2): 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., R. Halverson, and J. B. Diamond. 2001. “Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective.” Educational Researcher 30 (3): 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, N., and M. Fava. 2019. “Challenging Racialized Institutions: A History of Black and Minority Ethnic Housing Associations in England Between 1948 and 2018.” Journal of Management History 26 (3): 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-08-2019-0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. 2014. “‘Gender Equality as Institutional Work: The Case of the Church of Sweden: Gender Equality as Institutional Work.” Gender, Work & Organization 21 (2): 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., and A. Davies. 2005. “What Have the Feminists Done for Us? Feminist Theory and Organizational Resistance.” Organization 12 (5): 711–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. 2009. “Craving for Generality and Small-N Studies: A Wittgensteinian Approach Towards the Epistemology of the Particular in Organization and Management Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by D. A. Buchanan and A. Bryman, 285–301. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., and D. H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WomenEd. 2020. WomenEd - About us, WomenED. Accessed December 5, 2020. https://www.womened.org/aboutus.
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, E., and K. Johnston. 2022. “Athena SWAN: “Institutional Peacocking” in the Neoliberal University.” Gender, Work & Organization 30 (3): 757–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. 2002. “Institutionization as an Interplay Between Actions, Meanings and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 234–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar