Fragility Curves Evaluation for Broken-Back Block Quay Walls

References

• Amirabadi, R., Bargi, K., Dolatshahi Piroz, M., Heidary Torkamani, H., and Mccullough, N. [2014 ] “Determination of optimal probabilistic seismic demand models for pile-supported wharves,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance 10(9), 1119–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S. and Kaynia, A. M. [2015 ] “Analytical seismic fragility functions for highway and railway embankments and cuts,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44(11), 1863–1879.
   Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S. and Pitilakis, K. [2012 ] “Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 35, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S., Kaynia, A. M., and Pitilakis, K. [2013 ] “Development of fragility functions for geotechnical constructions: application to cantilever retaining walls,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 50, 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC) [1985 ] “Earthquake damage evaluation data for California,” ATC-13, Redwood City, California.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A. and Lai, C. G. [2013 ] “Fragility functions of block work wharves using artificial neural networks,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 52, 88–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, J.-Sh., Chiang, Ch.-H., Yang, H.-H. and Hsu, Sh.-Y. [2011 ] “Developing fragility curves for a pile-supported wharf,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31, 830–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EAU [2004 ] “Recommendations of the committee for waterfront structures harbours and waterways,” 8th ed., Translation of the 10th German Edition, Issued by the Committee for Waterfront Structures of the Society for Harbour Engineering and the German Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• CEN Eurocode 8 [2006 ] “Design of structures for earthquake resistance,” prEN 1998-5, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Gijt, J. G. de and Broeken, M. L. [2014 ] “Quay walls,” 2nd ed.; SBRCURnet Municipality Rotterdam Port of Rotterdam, SBRCURnet, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Heidary-Torkamani, H., Bargi, K., Amirabadi, R., and Mccllough, N. J. [2014 ] “Fragility estimation and sensitivity analysis of an idealized pile-supported wharf with batter piles,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 61-62, 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichii, K. [2003 ] “Application of performance-based seismic design concept for caisson-type quay walls,” Ph.D. dissertation, Kyoto University.
   Google Scholar
• Ichii, K. [2004 ] “Fragility curves for gravity-type quay walls based on effective stress analyses,” 13th WCEE, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Itasca [2014 ] FLAC Version 7.0: Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua-User’s Guide, Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Kakderi, K. and Pitilakis, K. [2010 ] “Seismic analysis and fragility curves of gravity waterfront structures,” Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics and Symposium in Honour of Prof. I. M. Idriss, 6.04a.
   Google Scholar
• Karakus, H. [2007 ] “New seismic design approaches for block type quay walls,” Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, K. R. and Yamazaki, F. A. [2003 ] “Simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 32, 1603–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagaros, N. D., Tsompanakis, Y., Psarropoulos, P. N., and Georgopoulos, E. C. [2009 ] “Computationally efficient seismic fragility analysis of geostructures,” Journal of Computers and Structures 87, 1195–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama, Y., Yamazaki, F., Mizuno, K., Tsuchiya, Y., and Yogai, H. [2010 ] “Fragility curves for expressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30, 1158–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, K. [1991 ] “Generic seismic ruggedness of power plant equipment,” EPRI NP-5223-SL Revision 1, Electric Power Research Institute, Oakland, California.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) [2004 ] HAZUS-MH: Users’s Manual and Technical Manuals, Report prepared for the FEMA.
   Google Scholar
• OCDI [2002 ] “Technical standards and commentaries for port and harbour facilities in Japan,” The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquali, R., Lai, C. G., and Corigliano, M. [2010 ] “Some issues in seismic analysis and design of blockwork wharves,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 14, 102–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEER [2010] “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; PEER Strong Motion Database,” University of California, Berkeley, California; http://peer.berkeleyedu/ngawest/databases.html.
   Google Scholar
• PIANC [2001 ] Seismic Design Guidelines for Port Structures, Permanent International Navigation Association, A.A. Balkema Publishers, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, K., Crowley, H., and Kaynia, A. [2014 ] “SYNER-G: Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk,” Vol 27, Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering (Springer Editions, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. [2015 ] A Beginner’s Guide to Fragility, Vulnerability, and Risk, University of Colorado Boulder and SPA Risk LLC, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Sadrekarimi, A. [2010 ] “Pseudo-static lateral earth pressures on broken-back retaining walls,” Canadian. Geotechnical Journal 47, 1247–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadrekarimi, A. [2011 ] “Seismic displacement of broken-back gravity quay walls,” Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering ASCE 137(2), 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadrekarimi, A. [2013 ] “Dynamic behavior of granular soils at shallow depths from 1 g shaking table tests,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17(2), 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadrekarimi, A., Ghalandarzadeh, A., and Sadrekarimi, J. [2008 ] “Static and dynamic behavior of hunchbacked gravity quay walls,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28, 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seismosoft [2013] “SeismoMatch v2.1.0: an application capable of adjusting earthquake accelerograms to match a specific target response spectrum,” http://www.seismosoft.com/seismomatch-v21.
   Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, C. and Lai, C. G. [2012 ] “Preliminary definition of fragility curves for pile-supported wharves,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16(S1), 83–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uwabe, T. [1983 ] “Estimation of earthquake damage deformation and cost of quay walls based on earthquake damage records,” Technical Note of Port and Harbour Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, S. D., Taylor, C. E., and Ferritto, J. M. [1999 ] “Seismic risk reduction planning for ports lifelines,” 5th U.S. Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, TCLEE, Monograph No. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Ch.-Sh. W., DesRoches, R., and Rix, G. J. [2012 ] “Numerical fragility analysis of vertical-pile-supported wharves in the western united states,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16, 579–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar