A Data-based Probabilistic Approach for the Generation of Spectra-Compatible Time-History Records

References

• Ahmadi, G. [1979]. “Generation of artificial time-histories compatible with given response spectra — a review.” Solid Mechanics Archives, 4(3), 207–239.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, K. and Bommer, J. J. [2007]. “Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: A review of current practice and code provisions.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11(S1), 13–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bycroft, G. [1960]. “White noise representation of earthquakes.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 88, 75–106.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciola, P. [2010]. “A stochastic approach for generating spectrum compatible fully nonstationary earthquakes.” Computers and Structures, 88, 889–901.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciola, P. and Deodatis, G. [2011]. “A method for generating fully non-stationary and spectrum-compatible ground motion vector processes.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciola, P. and Zentner, I. [2012]. “Generation of response-spectrum-compatible artificial earthquake accelograms with random joint time-frequency distributions.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 28, 52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte, J. and Peng, B. [1997]. “Fully nonstationary analytical earthquake ground-motion model.” ASCE, 123(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Deodatis, G. [1996a]. “Non-stationary stochastic vector processes: seismic ground motion applications.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 11, 149–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deodatis, G. [1996b]. “Simulation of ergodic multi-variate stochastic processes.” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122, 778–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. and Cakmak, A. [1991]. “Time series modelling of strong ground motion from multiple event earthquakes.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10(1), 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization [2003]. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Beligum.
   Google Scholar
• Fardis, M., Carvalho, E., Elnashai, A., Faccioli, E., Pinto, P., and A. Plumier, A. [2005]. Designers Guide to EN 1998-1 and EN 1998-5, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance., General rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures. Thomas Telford Ltd., London.
   Google Scholar
• Giaralis, A. and Spanos, P. [2009]. “Wavelet-based response spectrum compatible synthesis of accelograms — Eurocode application (EC8).” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 219–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J., Abrahamson, N., Bommer, J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E., and Mendis, R. [2006]. “An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10, 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housner, G. [1955]. “Properties of strong ground motion earthquakes.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 45, 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Housner, G. [1959]. “Behavior of structures during earthquakes.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, EM4, 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Housner, G. and Jennings, P. [1964]. “Generation of artificial earthquakes.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 90, 113–150.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE Standards Association [2005]. 693-2005 - IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations. Piscataway, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., and Cosenza, E. [2008]. “Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(1), 54–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G., and Cosenza, E. [2009]. “A note on selection of time-histories for seismic analysis of bridges in Eurocode 8.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 13(8), 1125–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, K. [1957]. “Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground.” Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 35, 309–324.
   Google Scholar
• Katsanos, E., Sextos, A., and Manolis, G. [2010]. “Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30, 157–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. and Kareem, A. [1993]. “Simulation of multi-variate random processes: hybrid DFT and digital filtering approach.” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119, 1078–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Chaudhuri, S., and Shinozuka, M. [2007]. “Simulation of nonstationary stochastic processes by spectral representation.” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 133, 616–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri, S., Bekey, G., and Safford, F. [1980]. “A global optimization algorithm using adaptive random search.” Applied Mathematics and Computation, 7(4), 353–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri, S., Miller, R., and Traina, M. [1990]. “Probabilistic representation and transmission of earthquake ground motion records.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19, 1025–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolet, M. and Spanos, P. [1987a]. “Recursive simulation of stationary multi-variate random processes, Part I.” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 54, 674–680.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolet, M. and Spanos, P. [1987b]. “Recursive simulation of stationary multi-variate random processes, Part II.” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 54, 681–687.
   Google Scholar
• Preumont, A. [1980]. “A method for the generation of artificial earthquake accelerograms.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 59(2), 357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, O. and Novak, M. [1993]. “Simulation of spatially incoherent random ground motion.” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119(5), 997–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, O. and Novak, M. [1994]. “Simulation of multidimensional anisotropic ground motions.” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 120(8), 1773–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaeian, S. and Der Kiureghian, A. [2008]. “A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities.“ Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 1565–1584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaeian, S. and Der Kiureghian, A. [2010]. “Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39, 1155–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shama, A. [2007]. “Simplified procedure for simulating spatially correlated earthquake ground motions.” Engineering Structures, 2(9), 248–258.
   Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M. [1971]. “Simulation of multivariate and multidimensional random processes.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M. and Deodatis, G. [1988]. “Stochastic process models of earthquake ground motion.” Journal of Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 3(3), 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, P. and Vargas Loli, L. M. [1985]. “A statistical approach to generation of design spectrum compatible earthquake time histories.” International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 4(1), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, W. [1959]. Spectral aspect of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 49(1):91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Traina, M., Miller, R., and Masri, S. [1986]. “Orthogonal decomposition and transmission of nonstationary random processes.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1(3), 136–149.
   Google Scholar
• Vanmarcke, E. and Gasparini, D. [1977]. “Simulated earthquake ground motions.” In SMIRT-4, Paper K1/9, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Vanmarcke, E., Heredia-Zavoni, E., and Fenton, G. [1993]. “Conditional simulation of spatially correlated earthquake ground motion.” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 119(11), 2333–2352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, Y. and Baker, J. [2013]. “Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(6), 3044–3056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner, I. [2007]. “Simulation of spatially incoherent, non-stationary seismic free field motion and its impact on response in SSI analysis.” In ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Zentner, I. [2013]. “Simulation of non-stationary conditional ground motion fields in the time domain.” Georisk, 7(1), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zerva, A. [1992]. “Seismic ground motion simulations from a class of spatial variability models.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7, 217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Zerva, A. and Shinozuka, M. [1991]. “Stochastic differential ground motion.” Structural Safety, 10, 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar