Application of the Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences in Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures

References

• Abdelnaby, A. E. [2012] “Multiple earthquake effects on degrading reinforced concrete structures,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Abdollahzadeh, G. R., Vahedian, V. and Omranian, E. [2018] A new method for generating aftershock records using artificial neural network, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (revised), Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Boore, D. M. [2003] “Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method,” Pure Applied Geophysics 160(3–4), 635–676. doi: 10.1007/PL00012553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, D. E. and Longuet-Higgins, M. S. [1956] “The statistical distribution of the maxima of a random function,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 237(1209), 212–232. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1956.0173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craifaleanu, I. G. [2011] “Investigation of the frequency content of ground motions recorded during strong Vrancea earthquakes, based on deterministic and stochastic indices,” Eighth International Conference on Structural Dynamics EURODYN 2011(1), 2893–2898.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, K. and Moehle, J. [2003] “Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames,” PEER 2003/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• EQE Engineering. [1990] “The July 16, 1990 Philippines earthquake,” A quick look report.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R. [2012] “Mainshock–aftershock ground motion features and their influence in building’s seismic response,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16(5), 719–737. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2012.663154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Marin, M. V. and Gilmore, A. T. [2014] “Effect of seismic sequences in reinforced concrete frame buildings located in soft-soil sites,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 63, 56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goda, K. and Taylor, C. A. [2012] “Effects of aftershocks on peak ductility demand due to strong ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41(15), 2311–2330. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, R. and Chopra, A. K. [1994] “Seismic response study of the US 101/painter street overpass using strong motion records,” in Procs. Of SMIP94 Seminar on Seismological and Engineering Implications of Recent Strong-Motion Data, ed. M. Huang (California Seismic Safety Commission, Los Angeles, California), pp. 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, F. and Abdelnaby, A. E. [2017] “Effect of different aspects of multiple earthquakes on the nonlinear behavior of RC structures,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 92, 706–725. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, F. and Abdelnaby, A. E. [2017] “Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 98, 222–234. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, J. and Khanmohammadi, M. [2015] “New approach for selection of real input ground motion records for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA),” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 19(4), 592 623. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2014.997901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, J. and Pezeshk, S. [2017] “Sensitivity analysis of the seismic demands of RC moment resisting frames to different aspects of ground motions,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. L. [1995] Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, John Wiley and Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Zuo, Z., Zhai, C., Xu, S. and Xie, L. [2016] “Shaking table test on the collapse process of a three-story reinforced concrete frame structure,” Engineering Structures 118, 156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H. and Fenves, G. L. [2009] “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual,” University of California, Berkeley, CA. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, E. [1993] “Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra,” Journal of Structural Engineering 119(5), 1319–1338. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1319).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, E. and Taghavi, S. [2005] “Approximate floor acceleration demands in multistory buildings. I: formulation,” Journal of Structural Engineering 131(2), 203–211. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:2(203).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshref, M., Khammohammadi, M. and Tehranizadeh, M. [2017] “Assessment of the seismic capacity of mainshockdamaged reinforced concrete columns,” Bulletin Earthquake Engineering 15, 291–311. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9952-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari, N. [2015] “Methodology and applications for integrating earthquake aftershock risk into performance-based seismic design,” Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Nazari, N., De Lindt, J. W. and Li, Y. [2015] “Effect of mainshock-aftershock sequences on woodframe building damage fragilities,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29(1). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenSees. [2012] The Open System For Earthquake Engineering Simulation ( available online at http://opensees.berkeley.edu). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. [2008] “Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic performance evaluation of retrofit measures for typical steel girder bridges,” Engineering Structures 30, 1869–1878. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. J. N. [1992] Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, Wiley, NewYork, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N. [1988] “The whittier narrows, California earthquake of October 1, 1987—damage to the I-5/I-605 separator,” Earthquake Spectra 4(2), 389–405. doi: 10.1193/1.1585481.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunandan, M., Liel, A. B. and Luco, N. [2015] “Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44(3), 419–439. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, K., DesRoches, R. and Padgett, J. E. [2012] “A comparison of pre- and post-seismic design considerations in moderate seismic zones through the fragility assessment of multi-span bridge classes,” Engineering Structures 45, 559–573. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathje, E. R., Abrahamson, N. A. and Bray, J. D. [1998] “Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers 124(2), 150–159. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoettler, M. J., Restrepo, J. I., Guerrini, G., Duck, D. E. and Carrea, F. [2015] “A full-scale, single-column bridge bent tested by shake-table excitation,” PEER Report No. 2015/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, R. and D’Ayala, D. [1999] “Damage assessment and analysis of the 1997 Umbria-Marche earthquake,” Structural Engineering International 9(3), 229–233. doi: 10.2749/101686699780482014.
   Google Scholar
• Thrainsson, H., Kiremidjan, A. S. and Winterstein, S. R. [2000] “Modelling of earthquake ground motion in the frequency domain,” Report No. 134, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Dept. of Civ. And Env. Engrg. Stanford University, California, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D. and Brady, A. G. [1975] “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(3), 581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. [2000] “Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999,” U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1193, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Vanmarcke, E. H. [1976] “Structural response to earthquakes,” in Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions, eds. C. Lomnitz and E. Rosenblueth (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Oxford, NY), pp. 287–337.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., He, F. and Liu, T. [2014] “Curvature ductility of columns and structural displacement ductility in RC frame structures subjected to ground motions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar