Simplified Pushover Analysis of Moment Resisting Frame Structures

References

• Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. [2004] “Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(5), 643–661. doi: 10.1080/13632460409350504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., Magenes, G. and Pampanin, S. [2002a] “Relevance of beam-column joint damage and collapse in RC frame assessment,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 6(Supp(1)), 75–100. doi: 10.1080/13632460209350433.
   Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., Magenes, G. and Pampanin, S. [2002b] “Experimental test on a three storey RC frame designed for gravity only,” 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. J. [2007] RUAUMOKO - User Manual, Theory, and Appendices (available online at http://www.civil.canterbury.ac.nz/ruaumoko/index.html).
   Google Scholar
• CSI. [2000] SAP2000 Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design (availabe online at https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000).
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-1:2004. [2004] Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-3:2005. [2005] Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 3: Assessment and Retrofit of Buildings, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. [2000] “A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design,” Earthquake Spectra 16(3), 573–592. doi: 10.1193/1.1586128.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 440. [2005] Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. A. [1978] “Prediction of response of concrete buildings to severe earthquake motion,” Douglas McHenry International Symposium on Concrete and Concrete Structures, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 589–605.
   Google Scholar
• Galli, M. [2006] “Evaluation of the seismic response of existing RC frame buildings with masonry infills,” MSc Thesis, IUSS Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Glaister, S. and Pinho, R. [2003] “Development of a simplified deformation-based method for seismic vulnerability assessment,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7(Supp(1)), 107–140. doi: 10.1080/13632460309350475.
   Google Scholar
• Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M. A. [1974] “Inelastic responses of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions,” ACI Journal 71(12), 604–610. doi: 10.14359/17694.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. F. [2017] “On the descending branch of the pushover curve for multistory buildings,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., Scott, M. H. and Fenves, G. L. [2010] “Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24(1), 95–107. doi: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC. [2008] Norme Tecniche Per Le Costruzioni, Ministro delle Infrastrutture (Italian Ministry of Infrastructure), Rome, Italy (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• NZS 1170.5:2004. [2004] Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions - New Zealand, Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• NZSEE. [2017] The Seismic Assessment of Buildings: Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessments, Part C-C2: Assessment Procedures and Analysis Techniques, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.eq-assess.org.nz/new-home/part-c/c2/
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J. [2016] “Performance-based seismic assessment and retrofit of existing RC frame buildings in Italy,” PhD Thesis, IUSS Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J. and Sullivan, T. J. [2017] “Modeling techniques for the seismic assessment of the existing italian RC frame structures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–35. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1360224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J. and Sullivan, T. J. [2018] “Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16(3), 1447–1485. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0257-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J., Sullivan, T. J. and Filiatrault, A. [2017] “Implications of a more refined damage estimation approach in the assessment of RC frames,” 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Pampanin, S., Calvi, G. M. and Moratti, M. [2002] “Seismic behaviour of RC beam-column joints designed for gravity loads,” 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01).
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou, V. K., Elnashai, A. S. and Pareja, J. F. [2006] “Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: comparative results,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(1), 127–151. doi: 10.1080/13632460609350590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R. and Paulay, T. [1975] Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pettinga, D. and Priestley, M. J. N. [2005] “Dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames designed with direct displacement-based design,” ROSE Report 2005/02, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho, R., Antoniou, S. and Pietra, D. [2006] “A displacement-based adaptive pushover for seismic assessment of steel and reinforced concrete buildings,” 8th US National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N. [1997] “Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1(1), 157–192. doi: 10.1080/13632469708962365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N. and Calvi, G. M. [1991] “Towards a capacity-design assessment procedure for reinforced concrete frames,” Earthquake Spectra 7(3), 413–437. doi: 10.1193/1.1585635.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M. and Kowalsky, M. J. [2007] Displacement Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M., 1996. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, 686 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Regio Decreto. [1939] Norme per l’esecuzione delle opere conglomerato cementizio semplice od armato - 2229/39, Gazzetta Ufficiale, n.92 of 18-04-1940 - Suppl. Ord. n. 92, Rome, Italy (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Saborío-Romano, D. [2016] “Performance based and simplified displacement based assessment of infilled RC frame building in L’Aquila, Italy,” MSc Thesis, IUSS Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. [2014] SeismoStruct v7.0 – A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures (available online at http://www.seismosoft.com/seismostruct).
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, A. and Sozen, M. A. [1976] “Substitute-structure method for seismic design in R/C,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 102(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J., and Calvi, G. M., [2011] “Considerations for the Seismic Assessment of Buildings Using the Direct Displacement-Based Assessment Approach.” In Atti Del 5 Convegno Nazionale ANIDIS. Bari, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J., Priestley, M. J. N. and Calvi, G. M., Eds. [2012] A Model Code for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures - DBD12, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Tasligedik, A. S., Akguzel, U., Kam, W. Y. and Pampanin, S. [2018] “Strength hierarchy at reinforced concrete beam-column joints and global capacity,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22(3), 454–487. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1233916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vona, M. and Masi, A. [2004] “Resistenza sismica di telai in c.a. progettati con il R.D. 2229/39,” XI Congresso Nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Genova, Italia (in Italian).
   Google Scholar