Effect of Damping Modeling and Characteristics on Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Multi-Frame Bridges

References

• AASHTO. [1998] Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M., Abedini, M. J., Zakeri, B. and Ghodrati Amiri, G. [2016a] “Seismic vulnerability assessment of a Californian multi-frame curved concrete box girder viaduct using fragility curves,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 12, 1585–1601. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1152586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M. and Moustafa, M. A. [2016b]. “Effect of viscous damping modeling characteristics on seismic response of bridges,” Proc. Istanbul Bridge Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 8–10 August.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M. and Moustafa, M. A. [2017] “Effect of shear keys on seismic response of different irregular bridge configurations. Transportation research record,” Journal of Transportation Research Board 2642, 155–165. doi:10.3141/2642-17.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M. and Moustafa, M. A. [2019] “Time-Dependent Seismic Fragilities of Older and Newly Designed Multi-Frame Reinforced Concrete Box-Girder Bridges in California,” Earthquake Spectra 35(1), 233–266. doi:10.1193/102317EQS220M.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi, M., Zakeri, B. and Amiri, G. G. [2015] “Probabilistic seismic assessment of multiframe concrete box-girder bridges with unequal-height piers,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 30, 04015016. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATC/MCEER. [2003]. “Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the seismic design of highway bridges,” Report No. MCEER/ATC- 49. Applied Technology Council and Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Redwood City, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyub, B. M. and Lai, K.-L. [1989] “Structural reliability assessment using latin hypercube sampling,” in Structural Safety and Reliability, (ASCE), pp. 1177–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. and Cornell, C. A. [2008] “Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation,” Structural Safety 30(3), 236–252. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, D. [1994] “Viscous damping in inelastic structural response,” Journal of Structural Engineering 120, 1240–1254. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:4(1240).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caltrans. [2007]. “Reinforced concrete bridge capacity assessment training manual,” Report submitted to Structure Maintenance and Investigation. Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. J. [2005] User Manual for the 2-Dimensional Version Ruaumoko2D (University of Canterbury, Department of Civil Engineering, Computer Program Library, New Zealand).
   Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C. and Ellingwood, B. R. [2010] “Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties,” Structural Safety 32, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, G. A. and Mander, J. B. [1994]. “Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: part 1 – evaluation of seismic capacity,” Technical Report No. NCEER-94-0006. State University of New York, Buffalo, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Charney, F. A. [2008] “Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering 134, 581–592. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(581).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, E. [2002]. “Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges,” PhD Dissertation, (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia).
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. [2007] Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. and Mckenna, F. [2016] “Modeling viscous damping in nonlinear response history analysis of buildings for earthquake excitation,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45, 193–211. doi:10.1002/eqe.2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O. and Foutch, D. A. [2002] “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines,” Journal of Structural Engineering 128, 526–533. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, A. [1999]. “On energy based seismic analysis and design of highway bridges,” Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. [1992] “Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife,” in Breakthroughs in Statistics, (Springer, New York, NY), pp. 569–593.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B. and Hwang, H. [1985] “Probabilistic descriptions of resistance of safety-related structures in nuclear plants,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 88, 169–178. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(85)90059-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, E. [2012] “Evaluation of Rayleigh damping and its influence on engineering demand parameter estimates,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41, 1905–1919. doi:10.1002/eqe.2164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. [2011] Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Earthquake Model HAZUS-MH MR5 Technical Manual, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. [2002] National Bridge Inventory Data, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. F. [2006] “Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35, 525–545. doi:10.1002/eqe.541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehel, P., Léger, P. and Ibrahimbegovic, A. [2014] “Initial versus tangent stiffness‐based Rayleigh damping in inelastic time history seismic analyses,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43, 467–484. doi:10.1002/eqe.2357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawinkler, H., Medina, R. and Alavi, B. [2003] “Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions,” Journal of Engineering Structures 25, 637–653. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00174-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, P. and Dussault, S. [1992] “Seismic-energy dissipation in MDOF structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering 118, 1251–1269. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1251).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LPILE v6.0. [2012] A Program for the Analysis and Design of Piles and Drilled Shafts under Lateral Loads, Ensoft Inc, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. R. and Stojadinovic, B. [2001] “Probabilistic seismic demand model for California bridges,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 468–480. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468).
   Google Scholar
• Mai, C., Konakli, K. and Sudret, B. [2017] “Seismic fragility curves for structures using non-parametric representations,” Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering 11(2), 169–186. doi:10.1007/s11709-017-0385-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., Kim, D., Chen, S. and Premus, G. [1996]. “Response of steel bridge bearings to reversed cyclic loading,” Report No. 96-0014, NCEER.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenna, F., Fenves, G. and Scott, M. [2000] Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Megally, S. H., Silva, P. F. and Seible, F. [2002]. “Seismic response of sacrificial shear keys in bridge abutments,” SSRP-2001/24, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Morokoff, W. J. and Caflisch, R. E. [1995] “Quasi-monte carlo integration,” Journal of Computational Physics 122, 218–230. doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, S. [2003]. “A contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. and Desroches, R. [2006]. “Effect of using PGA versus Sa on the uncertainty in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridges,” 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA. 18–22. doi:10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G. [2005]. “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G. and Desroches, R. [2007] “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36, 823–839. doi:10.1002/eqe.655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E. and Desroches, R. [2008] “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37, 1157–1174. doi:10.1002/eqe.801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEER, NGA-West 2. Strong motion database. ( available online at https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/).
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, K. N. [2012]. “Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• SAC. [1997]. SAC joint venture steel project Phase 2 - Project Task: 5.4.1: suites of earthquake ground motions for analysis of steel moment frame structures. SAC Steel Project, Richmond, ( available online at http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strong_motion/sacsteel/ground_motion.html).
   Google Scholar
• Shafieezadeh, A., Ramanathan, K., Padgett, J. E. and DesRoches, R. [2012] “Fractional order intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling applied to highway bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41(3), 391–409. doi:10.1002/eqe.1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsabadi, A., Khalili-Tehrani, P., Stewart, J. P. and Taciroglu, E. [2009] “Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills,” Journal of Bridge Engineering 15, 302–311. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsabadi, A. and Yan, L. [2008] “Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems,” Proc. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamic IV Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Zareian, F. and Medina, R. A. [2010] “A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems,” Computers & Structures 88, 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar