Development of a Numerical Tool for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Vernacular Architecture

References

• Aguilar, V., C. Sandoval, J. M. Adam, J. Garzón-Roca, and G. Valdebenito. [2016]. Prediction of the shear strength of reinforced masonry walls using a large experimental database and artificial neural networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 12(12), 1661–74. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1157824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo-Ibáñez, Q., Á. Mas-Tomás, V. Galvañ-Llopis, and J. L. Sántolaria-Montesinos. [2012]. Traditional braces of earth constructions. Constructions and Building Materials 30, 389–99. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbat, A., M. Eeri, F. Yépez Moya, and J. A. Canas. [1996]. Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban zones. Earthquake Spectra 12(3), 371–94. doi:10.1193/1.1585889.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu, A., H. Güllü, H. Çanakçi, and L. Özbakir. [2008]. Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of limestone via genetic programming. Expert Systems with Applications 35, 111–23. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, D., P. Carydis, and P. Pezzoli. [1998]. Shaking table tests on 24 simple masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 27, 67–90. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199801)27:1<67::AID-EQE719>3.0.CO;2-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, D., and V. Petrini. [1984]. Sulla Vulnerabilità Di Edifici in Muratura: Proposta Di Un Metodo Di Valutazione. L’industria Delle Costruzioni 149(1), 66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Betti, M., L. Galano, and A. Vignoli. [2014]. Comparative analysis on the seismic behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Engineering Structures 61, 195–208. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondet, M., G. M. Villa García, S. Brzev, and A. Rubiños. [2011]. Earthquake-resistant construction of adobe buildings: A tutorial. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
   Google Scholar
• Bothara, J., and S. Brzev. [2012]. A tutorial: improving the seismic performance of stone masonry buildings. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., and M. Bensaibi. [2008]. Vulnerability index of algiers masonry buildings. Proc. of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China
   Google Scholar
• Correia, M. [2002]. A habitação vernácula rural no Alentejo, Portugal. Memorias del IV Seminario Iberoamericano sobre vivienda rural y calidad de vida en los asentamientos rurales, Santiago del Chile, Chile
   Google Scholar
• Correia, M. [2007]. Taipa no Alentejo. Lisboa, Portugal: Argumentum.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, M. [2017]. Experiences from past for today’s challenges. In The road to sustainable development. Chapter 6 – Traditional and generational change. 128-133. Madrid, Spain: La Fábrica, Fundación Contemporánea.
   Google Scholar
• Cortez, P. [2010]. Data mining with neural networks and support vector machines using the R/rminer tool. Proc. of 10th Industrial Conference, ICDM 2010, Berlin, Germany
   Google Scholar
• Degg, M. R., and J. Homan. [2005]. Earthquake vulnerability in the Middle East. Geography 90(1), 54–66.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-3. [2005]. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
   Google Scholar
• Fayyad, U., G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth. [1996]. From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. Al Magazine 17(3), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., R. Vicente, J. A. R. Mendes Da Silva, H. Varum, and A. Costa. [2013]. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: case study of the old city centre in Seixal, Portugal. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11(5), 1753–73. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9447-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., R. Vicente, and H. Varum. [2014]. Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry facade walls: Development, application and validation of a new scoring method. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 50(4), 541–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., J. Miles, and Z. Field. [2012]. Discovering statistics using R. London: SAGE Publising.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, S., F. Günther, M. Suling, and S. Müller. [2016]. Package ‘neuralnet’. R manual.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, R., and I. Arto. [2014]. Evaluation of seismic behaviour of rammed earth structures. In Earthen architecture: past, present and future, ed. C. Mileto, F. Vegas, L. G. Soriano, and V. Cristini. 151-156. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Garzón-Roca, J., J. M. Adam, C. Sandoval, and P. Roca. [2013b]. Estimation of the axial behavior of masonry walls based on artificial neural networks. Computers and Structures 125, 145–52. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Garzón-Roca, J., C. Marco, and J. M. Adam. [2013a]. Compressive strength of masonry made of clay bricks and cement mortar: Estimation based on neural networks and fuzzy logic. Engineering Structures 48, 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., J. Prajapati, K. V. Paterno, K. K. Bhetwal, and P. Neupane. [2016]. Disaster resilient vernacular housing technology in Nepal. Geoenvironmental Disasters 3(1). doi:10.1186/s40677-016-0036-y.
   Google Scholar
• GNDT. [1994]. Scheda di esposizione e vulnerabilita ` e di rilevamento danni di primo livello e secondo livello (muratura e cemento armato). Rome, Italy: Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti (GNDT).
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, M. I., M. Lopes, and J. de Brito. [2011]. Seismic resistance of earth construction in Portugal. Engineering Structures 33(3), 932–41. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, F., and S. Fritsch. [2010]. neuralnet: Training of neural networks. The R Journal 2(1), 30–38. doi:10.32614/RJ-2010-006.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. [1999]. Charter on the built vernacular heritage, International Council of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), ICOMOS 12th General Assembly, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Kallioras, S., G. Guerrini, U. Tomassetti, B. Marchesi, A. Penna, and F. Graziotti. [2018]. Experimental seismic performance of a full-scale unreinforced clay-masonry building with flexible timber diaphragms. Engineering Structures 161, 231–49. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanikoloudis, G., and P. B. Lourenço. [2018]. Structural assessment and seismic vulnerability of earthen historic structures. Application of sophisticated numerical and simple analytical models. Engineering Structures 160, 488–509. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottegodo, N., and R. Rosso. [2008]. Applied statistics for civil and environmental engineers. NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B. [2009]. Recent advances in masonry structures: micromodelling and homogenization. In Multiscale modeling in solid mechanics: computational approaches, ed. U. Galvanetto, Ferri, and M. H. Aliabadi, 280–300. London: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., G. Karanikoloudis, N. Mendes, and C. Corallo. [2015]. Assessment of the South aisle in Canterbury. Proceeding of the 2nd International conference on preservation, maintenance and rehabilition of historical buildings and structures, Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., N. Mendes, L. F. Ramos, and D. V. Oliveira. [2011]. Analysis of masonry structures without box-behavior. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5(4–5), 369–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., A. Penna, I. E. Senaldi, M. Rota, and A. Galasco. [2014]. Shaking table test of a strengthened full-scale stone masonry building with flexible diaphragms. International Journal of Architectural Heritagen 8, 349–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallardo, V., R. Malvezzi, E. Milani, and G. Milani. [2008]. Seismic vulnerability of historical masonry buildings: a case study in Ferrara. Engineering Structures 30, 2223–41. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, R., and P. B. Lourenço. [2013]. A model for pushover analysis of confined masonry structures: implementation and validation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11, 2133–50. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9497-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, F., G. Vasconcelos, and T. Miranda. [2014]. The performance of ultrasonic pulse velocity on the prediction of tensile granite behaviour: A study based on artificial neural networks. Proceeding. of 9th International Masonry Conference, Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, F., G. Vasconcelos, and T. Miranda. [2018]. Prediction of the mechanical properties of granite under tension using DM techniques. Geomechanics and Engineering 15(1), 631–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J. [2010]. Handmade houses & other buildings: the world of vernacular architecture. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, B., and J. Graces. [2002]. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden: MjM Software Design.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, N., and P. B. Lourenço. [2015]. Seismic vulnerability of existing masonry buildings: nonlinear parametric analysis. In Seismic assessment, behavior and retrofit of heritage buildings and monuments. Computational methods in applied sciences, ed. I. N. Psycharis, S. J. Pantazopoulou, and M. Papadrakakis, Vol. 37: 139-164. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, N., and P. B. Lourenço. [2010]. Seismic assessment of masonry ‘Gaioleiro’ buildings in Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 14, 80–101. doi:10.1080/13632460902977474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccoli, L., D. V. Oliveira, R. Silva, U. Müller, and L. Schueremans. [2014]. Static behaviour of rammed earth: experimental testing and finite element modelling. Materials and Structures 48(10), 3443–56. doi:10.1617/s11527-014-0411-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, T., A. G. Correia, M. Santos, L. Ribeira E Sousa, and P. Cortez. [2011]. New models for strength and deformability parameter calculation in rock masses using data-mining techniques. International Journal of Geomechanics 11(1), 44–58. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C., E. A. Peck, and G. G. Vining. [2012]. Introduction to linear regression analysis. Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mouyiannou, A., M. Rota, A. Penna, and G. Magenes. [2014]. Identification of suitable limit states from nonlinear dynamic analyses of masonry structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18(2), 231–63. doi:10.1080/13632469.2013.842190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouzakis, C., E. Vintzileou, C. E. Adam, and L. Karapitta. [2012]. Dynamic tests on three leaf stone masonry building model before and after interventions. Proceeding of Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, SAHC 2012, Wroclaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Neves, F., A. Costa, R. Vicente, C. S. Oliveira, and H. Varum. [2012]. Seismic vulnerability assessment and characterization of the buildings on Faial Island. Azores, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10(1), 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9276-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC. [2008]. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. D.M. 14 gennaio 2008, S.O. No. 30, G.U. No. 29/2008, Rome, Italy: Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. [1997]. Encyclopedia of vernacular architecture of the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, J. [2018]. Reduction of the seismic vulnerability of vernacular architecture with traditional strengthening solutions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, and M. Correia. [2018]. Assessment of the efficiency of traditional earthquake resistant techniques for vernacular architecture. Engineering Structures 173, 1–27. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plevris, V., and P. G. Asteris. [2014]. Modeling of masonry failure surface under biaxial compressive stress using neural networks. Construction and Building Materials 55, 447–61. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. [2008]. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. [1969]. House, form and culture. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rota, M., A. Penna, and G. Magenes. [2010]. A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Engineering Structures 32, 1312–23. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudofsky, B. [1964]. Architecture without architects – a short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Saloustros, S., L. Pelà, P. Roca, and J. Portal. [2014]. Numerical analysis of structural damage in the church of the Poblet Monastery. Engineering Failure Analysis 48, 41–61. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, C., and P. Roca. [2012]. Study of the influence of different parameters on the buckling behaviour of masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials 35, 888–99. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepe, V., E. Speranza, and A. Viskovic. [2008]. A method for large-scale vulnerability assessment of historic towers. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 15, 389–415. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1545-2263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakya, M. [2014]. Seismic vulnerability assessment of slender masonry structures. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, L., L. Liberatore, D. Liberatore, and R. Masiani. [2013]. The behaviour of vernacular buildings in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(5), 2367–82. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9455-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNO. [2011] Displacement method analyser. User’s manual, release 9.4.4., Netherlands: TNO DIANA BV.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, R. [2008]. Estratégias e metodologias para intervenções de reabilitação urbana. Avaliação da vulnerabilidade e do risco sísmico do edificado da Baixa de Coimbra. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, R., S. Parodi, S. Lagomarsino, H. Varum, and J. A. R. Mendes Da Silva. [2011]. Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: a case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9(4), 1067–96. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar