In-situ Ambient Vibration Study of a 900-kw Wind Turbine

References

• Abdel Wahab, M. M., and G. De Roeck. 1998. Dynamic testing of prestressed concrete bridges and numerical verification. Journal of Bridge Engineering 3 (4): 159–69. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1998)3:4(159).
   Google Scholar
• Allemang, R. J. 2003. The modal assurance criterion – Twenty years of use and abuse. Sound and Vibration 37 (8): 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allemang, R. J., and D. L. Brown. 1982. A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. Proceedings of the 1st International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, November 8–10, 110–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeos, N., G., Hatzigeorgiou, D. Hondros, I. D. Karamaneas, H. Karabalis, and D. E. Beskos. 2002. Static, seismic and stability analyses of a prototype wind turbine steel tower. Engineering Structures 24 (8): 1015–25. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00021-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossanyi, E. A. 2000. Bladed for windows user manual. Bristol, UK: Garrad Hassan and Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. L., R. J. Allemang, R. Zimmerman, and M. Mergeay. 1979. Parameters estimation techniques for modal analysis. Report No. Technique Paper 790221, Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Brownjohn, J. M. W., P. Moyo, P. Omenzetter, and Y. Lu. 2003. Assessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite-element model updating. Journal of Bridge Engineering 8 (3): 162–72. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:3(162).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carne, T. G., and A. R. Nord. 1983. Modal testing of a rotating wind turbine. Report No. SAND82-0631, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K. 2006. Dynamics of structures: Theory and application to earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Devriendt, C., F. Magalhães, W. Weijtjens, G. De Sitter, A. Cunha, and P. Guillaume. 2013. Automatic identification of the modal parameters of an offshore wind turbine using state-of-the-art operational modal analysis techniques. Proceedings of IOMAC’13, Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Di Lorenzo, E., G. Kosova, U. Musella, S. Manzato, B. Peeters, F. Marulo, and W. Desmet. 2015. Structural health monitoring challenges on the 10-MW offshore wind turbine model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 628 (1): 012081. IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Doebling, S. W., C. R. Farrar, M. B. Prime, and D. W. Shevitz. 1996. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review. Report No. LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA. DOI: 10.2172/249299.
   Google Scholar
• Ewins, D. J. 2000. Modal testing: Theory, practice, and application, 562. Baldock, UK: Research Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M., A. Elgamal, X. He, and J. P. Conte. 2010. Sensor network for structural health monitoring of a highway bridge. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenler, M., U. Ritschel, and I. Warnke. 2006. Systematic modelling of wind turbine dynamics and earthquake loads on wind turbines. European Wind Energy Conf. and Exhibition, Athens, Greece, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Halling, M. W., I. Muhammad, and K. C. Womack. 2001. Dynamic field testing for condition assessment of bridge bents. Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (2): 161–67. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(161).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., A. Hansen, T. J. Larsen, S. Oye, P. Sorensen, and P. Fuglsang. 2005. Control design for a pitch-regulated, variable speed wind turbine. Report No. Riso-R-1500(EN), Riso National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., K. Thomsen, P. Fuglsang, and T. Knudsen. 2006. Two methods for estimating aeroelastic damping of operational wind turbine modes from experiments. Wind Energy 9 (1–2): 171–91. doi:10.1002/we.187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, F. 1978. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE 66 (1): 51–83. doi:10.1109/PROC.1978.10837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., B. Moeveni, J. P. Conte, A. Elgamal, and S. F. Masri. 2009. System identification of Alfred Zampa memorial bridge using dynamic field test data. Journal of Structural Engineering 135 (1): 54–66. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445-135:1(54).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A. P., and M. B. Patrick. 1996. Tensionless pier foundation. U.S. Patent 5586417, Dec 24.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. R., and E. C. Mikulcik. 1997. A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response. The Shock and Vibration Bulletin 47 (4): 183–98.
   Google Scholar
• IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2005. IEC 61400-1 Ed.3: Wind turbines -–Part 1: Design requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
   Google Scholar
• James, G. H., III, T. G. Carne, and J. P. Lauffer. 1992. The natural excitation technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines. Report No. SAND92-1666, UC-261, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman, J., S. Butterfield, W. Musial, and G. Scott. 2009. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060, NREL, Golden, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman, J. M., and M. L. Buhl Jr. 2005. FAST user’s guide. Report No. NREL/EL-500-38230, NREL, Golden, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Juang, J. N., and R. S. Pappa. 1985. An Eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 8 (5): 620–27. doi:10.2514/3.20031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauffer, J. P., T. G. Carne, and T. D. Ashwill. 1998. Modal testing in the design evaluation of wind turbines. Report No. SAND87-2461, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lavassas, I., G. Nikolaidis, P. Zervas, E. Efthimiou, I. N. Doudoumis, and C. C. Baniotopoulos. 2003. Analysis and design of the prototype of a steel 1-MW wind turbine tower. Engineering Structures 25 (8): 1097–106. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00059-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco, J. E., M. D. Trifunac, and H. L. Wong. 1988. Isolation of soil-structure interaction effects by full-scale forced vibration tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 16 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290160102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm, D. J., and A. C. Hansen 2006. WindPACT turbine rotor design study. Report No. NREL/SR-500-32495, NREL, Golden, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, D. J., and D. L. Laird. 2003. Modeling of blades as equivalent beams for aeroelastic analysis. 2003 ASME Wind Energy Symposium AIAA/ASME, Reno, NV, 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Manzato, S., C. Devriendt, W. Weijtjens, E. Di Lorenzo, B. Peeters, and P. Guillaume. 2014. Removing the influence of rotor harmonics for improved monitoring of offshore wind turbines. In Dynamics of civil structures, edited by F. N. Catbas, Vol. 4, 299–312. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Molinari, M., M. Pozzi, D. Zonta, and L. Battisti. 2010. In-field testing of a steel wind turbine tower. Proceedings of the IMAC-XXVIII, Jacksonville, FL, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Murakawa, H., N. Kato, K. Fujii, and Y. Tamura. 1996. Experimental evaluation of aerodynamic damping of tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 59177–90. doi:10.1016/0167-6105(96)00006-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta, Y., and N. Goto. 1978. Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 6 (2): 167–87. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290060205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, B., and G. De Roeck. 2001. Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: A review. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 123 (4): 659–67. doi:10.1115/1.1410370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prowell, I., A. Elgamal, H. Romanowitz, and J. E. Duggan. 2010a. Earthquake response modeling for a parked and operating megawatt-scale wind turbine. Windpower, Dallas, TX, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Prowell, I., A. Elgamal, J. Jonkman, and C. Uang. 2010b. Estimation of seismic load demand for a wind turbine in the time domain. European Wind Energy Conference, Warsaw, Poland, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prowell, I., A. Elgamal, J. Lu, and J. E. Luco. 2009. Modal properties of a modern wind turbine including SSI. 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Prowell, I., and P. Veers. 2009. Assessment of wind turbine seismic risk: Existing literature and simple study of tower moment demand. Report No. SAND2009-1100, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschel, U., I. Warnke, J. Kirchner, and B. Meussen. 2003. Wind turbines and earthquakes. 2nd World Wind Energy Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Riziotis, V. A., S. G. Voutsinas, E. S. Politis, and P. K. Chaviaropoulos. 2004. Aeroelastic stability of wind turbines: The problem, the methods and the issues. Wind Energy 7 (4): 373–92. doi:10.1002/we.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfes, R., S. Zerbst, G. Haake, J. Reetz, and J. P. Lynch. 2007. Integral SHM-system for offshore wind turbines using smart wireless sensors. The 6th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, A. W., J. Pei, and S. Masri. 2003. System identification of the Vincent Thomas suspension bridge using earthquake records. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 32 (3): 339–67. doi:10.1002/eqe.226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., C. R. Farrar, F. M. Hemez, and J. J. Czarnecki. 2002. A review of structural health review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Report No. LA-UR-02-2095, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Van Overschee, P., and B. De Moor. 1996. Subspace identification for linear systems: Theory-implementation-applications. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, P. 1967. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 15 (2): 70–73. doi:10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, R., and M. Bolinger. 2008. Annual report on U.S. wind power installation, costs, and performance trends: 2007. Report No. DOE/GO-102008-2590, Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Witcher, D. 2005. Seismic analysis of wind turbines in the time domain. Wind Energy 8 (1): 81–91. doi:10.1002/we.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, E., D. H. Whang, J. P. Conte, J. P. Stewart, and J. W. Wallace. 2005. Forced vibration testing of buildings using the linear shaker seismic simulation (LSSS) testing method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34 (7): 737–61. doi:10.1002/eqe.453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., P. Maisser, and W. Jingyan. 2007. A new multibody modeling methodology for wind turbine structures using a cardanic joint beam element. Renewable Energy 2007 32 (3): 532–46. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar