Displacement-Based Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment of Pre-70S RC Buildings

References

• Abrahamson, N. A., and W. J. Silva. 1997. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68 (1): 94–127. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.94.
   Google Scholar
• Angel, R., D. Abrams, D. Shapiro, J. Uzarski, and M. Webster. 1994. Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills. Structural Research Series N. 589, UILU‐ENG‐942005, Dept. of civil ENG., University Of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• ATC - Applied Technology Council, ATC-20 guidelines. 1995. Procedures for post-earthquake safety evaluation of buildings. California, US.
   Google Scholar
• ATC - Applied Technology Council, FEMA P-58. 2012a. Next-generation seismic performance assessment for buildings. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C: Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• ATC - Applied Technology Council, FEMA P-58. 2012b. Next-generation seismic performance assessment for buildings. Vol. 2. Washington, D.C: Implementation Guide, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2011. Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection. Journal of Structural Engineering 137 (3): 322–31. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., R. P. Dhakal, M. Cubrinovski, J. B. Mander, and G. A. MacRae. 2007. Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (14): 2211–25. doi: 10.1002/eqe.727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, F., R. Gigliotti, M. Laterza, M. D’Amato, and S. F. Kunnath, and ASCE. 2012. Modified steel bar model incorporating bond-slip for seismic assessment of concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 138: 1342–50. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUR [Official Journal of Regione Basilicata]. 2013. n. 755 del 27/06/13. Price List of Public Works in Basilicata Region, Ed., Potenza [in Italian].
   Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., G. Magenes, and S. Pampanin. 2002. Experimental test on a three storey R.C. frame designed for gravity only. 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, paper n. 727.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D. 2016. Fragility curves and loss functions for RC structural components with smooth rebars. Earthquakes and Structures 10 (5): 1181–212. doi: 10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., and A. Flora. 2017. Multiple Inelastic Mechanisms Analysis (MIMA): A simplified method for the estimation of the seismic response of RC frame structures. Engineering Structures 145: 368–80. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., A. Flora, M. De Luca Picione, and A. Martoccia. 2019a. Estimating direct and indirect losses due to earthquake damage in residential RC buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 126 (2019): 105801. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105801.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., A. Flora, and B. Manganelli. 2014. Cost-benefit analysis of different retrofit strategies following a displacement-based loss assessment approach: A case study. In Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (10NCEE) July 21-25, 2014, Anchorage, Alaska. doi: 10.4231/D3CF9J706.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., G. Gesualdi, and G. Perrone. 2019. Cost-benefit analysis of alternative retrofit strategies for RC frame buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23 (2): 208–41. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1323041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., and G. Perrone. 2015. Developing fragility curves and loss functions for masonry infill walls. Earthquakes and Structures 9 (1): 257–79. doi: 10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., and G. Perrone. 2017. Damage and loss assessment of pre-70 RC frame buildings with FEMA P-58. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21: 23–61. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1149893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., G. Perrone, and V. Piesco. 2019b. Developing collapse fragility curves for base-isolated buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (1): 78–102. doi: 10.1002/eqe.v48.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., T. J. Sullivan, G. Gesualdi, and G. Perrone. 2017. Simplified estimation of the expected annual loss of reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (12): 2009–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIAMI. 2014. Collegio degli ingegneri e degli architetti di Milano. Prezzo tipologie edilizie. Rome, Italy: DEI - Tipografica del Genio Civile, Rome, Italy (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Decreto Ministeriale. 2017. Linee Guida per la Classificazione del Rischio Sismico delle Costruzioni – 58. Rome, Italy. [in Italian].
   Google Scholar
• DEI. 2014. rezzi tipologie edilizie, Collegio degli ingegneri ed architetti di Milano. Milano, Italy. [in Italian].
   Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, S. Pampanin, and A. Prota. 2018. Repair Costs of Existing RC Buildings Damaged by the L’Aquila Earthquake and Comparison with FEMA P-58 Predictions. Earthquake Spectra February 2018 34 (1): 237–63. doi: 10.1193/122916EQS257M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delibera Giunta Regionale Umbria-Marche (DGR). 1998. Terremoto in Umbra e Marche del 1997 Criteri di calcolo per la progettazione degli interventi, 1998, DGR Umbria 5180/98 -DGR Marche 2153/98, in attuazione L. 61/98 (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, M. Dolce. 2017. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: Part II - “heavy damage” reconstruction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15: 693. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., and G. Manfredi. 2015. Libro bianco sulla ricostruzione privata fuori dai centri storici nei comuni colpiti dal sisma dell’Abruzzo del 6 aprile 2009. Doppiavoce, Napoli, 153. (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, K. J., and J. P. Moehle. 2003. Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames. PEER Report 2003/01. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Grosso, L. 2007. Tempario per opere edili civili. Il sole 24 ore. (in italian).
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2007. Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Technical Report No. 156. Stanford, California: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University. http://blume.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and J. M. LaFave. 2007. Key influence parameters for the joint shear behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column connections. Engineering Structures 29: 2523–39. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawinkler, H. 2005. Van Nuys hotel building testbed report: Exercising seismic performance assessment. PEER Report 2005/11. Berkeley, California: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Masi, A., A. Digrisolo, and V. Manfredi. 2015. Fragility curves of gravity-load designed RC buildings with regularity in plan. Earthquakes and Structures 9 (1): 1–27. doi: 10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi, A., V. Manfredi, A. Digrisolo, and A. Laguardia. 2016. Integrated assessment of existing RC buildings: Seismic and thermal performances. Structural Magazine. ISSN 2282-3794. doi: 10.12917/Stru206.18.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, F. 2011. OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Computing in Science & Engineering 13 (4): 58–66. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaldo, V., and C. Meletti. 2007. Valutazione del valore della ordinata spettrale a 1sec e ad altri periodi di interesse ingegneristico. Progetto DPC-INGV S1, Deliverable D3.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J., R. Monteiro, A. M. Nafeh, T. J. Sullivan, and G. M. Calvi. 2019. Displacement-based framework for simplified seismic loss assessment of existing buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–22. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1730272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrone, G., D. Cardone, G. J. O’Reilly, and T. J. Sullivan. 2019. Developing a direct approach for estimating expected annual losses of Italian buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–32. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1657988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, A. 2013. Development of a simplified displacement-based procedure for the seismic design and assessment of RC frame structures. MSc Thesis. Italy: IUSS Pavia.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A. 2003. An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Proc. of Ninth International Conference on Applications of Probability and Statistics in Engineering, San Francisco, California.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A., J. L. Beck, and R. V. Shaikhutdinov. 2004. Simplified estimation of economic seismic risk for buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20 (4): 1239–63. doi: 10.1193/1.1809129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, C. M., and E. Miranda. 2009. Building specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance based earthquake engineering. Technical Report No. 171, John A. Blume Earthquake. Engineering Center. Stanford University. http://blume.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Romão, X., R. Delgado, and A. I. B. Costa. 2013. Alternative closed-form solutions for the mean rate of exceedance of structural limit states. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (12): 1827–45. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., and A. Elnashai. 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 25 (10): 1241–63. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassun, K., T. J. Sullivan, P. Morandi, and D. Cardone. 2015. Characterising the In-plane seismic performance of infill masonry. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 49 (1): 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J. 2016. Use of limit state loss versus intensity models for simplified estimation of expected annual loss. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 20 (6): 954–74. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2015.1112325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J., and G. M. Calvi. 2011. Considerations for the seismic assessment of buildings using the direct displacement-based assessment approach. Proc. of the 2011 ANIDIS Conference. Bari, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D. 2013. Derivation of new SAC/FEMA performance evaluation solutions with second-order hazard approximation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (8): 1171–88. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verderame, G. M., I. Iervolino, and P. Ricci. 2009. Report on the damage on buildings following the seismic event of 6th of April 2009 Time 1:32 - L’Aquila M=5.8. RELUIS.
   Google Scholar
• Verderame, G. M., P. Ricci, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2010. Ultimate chord rotation of RC columns with smooth bars: Some considerations about EC8 prescriptions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8: 1351–73. doi: 10.1007/s10518-010-9190-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D. P., T. J. Sullivan, and G. M. Calvi. 2014. Developing direct displacement-based procedures for simplified loss assessment in performance-based earthquake engineering. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (2): 290–322. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.851046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar