Displacement-Based Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment of Italian Precast Buildings

References

• Babič, A., and M. Dolšek. 2019. A five-grade grading system for the evaluation and communication of short-term and long-term risk posed by natural hazards. Structural Safety 78: 48–69. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2011. Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection. Journal of Structural Engineering 137 (3): 322–31. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A. 2017. Displacement based design for precast concrete frames with not-emulative connections. Engineering Structures 141: 228–40. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., E. Brunesi, R. Nascimbene, M. Pagani, and P. Riva. 2014. Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., F. Cornali, C. Passoni, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2017a. Evaluation of out-of-plane seismic performance of column-to-column precast concrete cladding panels in one-storey industrial buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 47: 397–417. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., M. Torquati, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2016. Horizontal cladding panels: In-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14: 1103–29. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9861-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., M. Torquati, P. Riva, and R. Nascimbene. 2015. Vulnerability assessment and retrofit solutions of precast industrial structures. Earthquake and Structures 8 (3): 801–20. doi: 10.12989/eas.2015.8.3.801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., and P. Riva. 2012. Seismic performance and retrofit of precast concrete grouted sleeve connections. PCI Journal 57 (1): 97–109. doi: 10.15554/pcij.
   Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., S. Labò, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2017b. The influence of overhead cranes in the seismic performance of industrial buildings. Frontiers in Built Environment, Section Earthquake Engineering 3 (64): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bournas, D. A., P. Negro, and F. Taucer. 2014. Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5): 2383–404. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9466-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunesi, E., R. Nascimbene, D. Bolognini, and D. Bellotti. 2015. Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of reinforced precast concrete framed structures. PCI Journal 15 (2): 57–79. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012015.57.79.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., G. Gesualdi, and G. Perrone. 2019. Cost-benefit analysis of alternative retrofit strategies for RC frame buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23 (2): 208–41. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1323041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casotto, C., V. Silva, H. Crowley, R. Nascimbene, and R. Pinho. 2015. Seismic fragility of Italian RC precast industrial structures. Engineering Structures 94: 122–36. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementi, F., A. Scalbi, and S. Lenci. 2016. Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings with dowel pin connections. Journal of Building Engineering 7: 224–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, A., P. Negro, G. Toniolo, and M. Lamperti. 2016. Design guidelines for precast structures with cladding panels. JRC Technical report, ISBN 978-92-79-58534-0
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency, steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (4): 526–53. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremen, G., and J. W. Baker. 2019. A methodology for evaluating component-level loss predictions of the FEMA P-58 seismic performance assessment procedure. Earthquake Spectra 35 (1): 193–210. doi: 10.1193/031618EQS061M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. 14/01/2008. 2008. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale Della Repubblica Italiana 29: 1–438.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, B., G. Toniolo, and M. Lamperti. 2016. Influence of different mechanical column‐foundation connection devices on the seismic behaviour of precast structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (12): 3485–3508. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-0010-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, B., S. Bianchi, and F. Biondini. 2019. Diaphragm effectiveness of precast concrete structures with cladding panels under seismic action. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (1): 473–95. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0452-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, S. Pampanin, and A. Prota. 2018. Repair costs of existing RC buildings damaged by the L’Aquila earthquake and comparison with FEMA P-58 predictions. Earthquake Spectra 34 (1): 237–63. doi: 10.1193/122916EQS257M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demartino, C., I. Vanzi, G. Monti, and C. Sulpizio. 2018. Precast industrial buildings in Southern Europe: Loss of support at frictional beam-to-column connections under seismic actions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (1): 259–94. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0196-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., and M. Dolsek. 2010. A practice-oriented approach for probabilistic seismic assessment. In Advances in performance-based earthquake engineering, ed. M. N. Fardis, 225–33. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA P-58-1. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1 – methodology, applied technology council. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fianchisti, G. 2012. Prezziario di riferimento per gli interventi locali e globali su edifici industriali monopiano non progettati con criteri antisismici di cui alle linee di indirizzo del 19.06/2012, v. 1.0 Protezione Civile. Reluis: CNI – ASSOBETON.
   Google Scholar
• Georios Baltzopoulos, G., R. Baraschino, I. Iervolino, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2017. SPO2FRAG: Software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15: 4399–425. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0145-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günay, M., and K. Mosalam. 2012. PEER performance based earthquake engineering methodology. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17 (6): 829–58. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.787377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. P., and B. Stojadinovic. 2010. Seismic performance assessment and probabilistic repair cost analysis of precast concrete cladding systems for multistory buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report 2010/110
   Google Scholar
• Krawinkler, H., and E. Miranda. 2004. Performance-based earthquake engineering. In Earthquake engineering, edited by., no. Ch. 9, International Code Council (ICC), Ed., 560–635. Washington, DC: CRC PRESS.
   Google Scholar
• Kremmyda, G. D., Y. M. Fahjan, I. N. Psycharis, and S. G. Tsoukantas. 2017. Numerical investigation of the resistance of precast RC pinned beam-to-column connections under shear loading. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46: 1511–29. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremmyda, G. D., Y. M. Fahjan, and S. G. Tsoukantas. 2014. Nonlinear FE analysis of precast RC pinned beam-to-column connections under monotonic and cyclic shear loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12: 1615–38. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9560-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnath, S. K., L. Larson, and E. Miranda. 2006. Modelling considerations in probabilistic performance-based seismic evaluation: Case study of the I-880 viaduct. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (1): 57–75. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., D. Bellotti, M. Cimmino, and R. Nascimbene. 2018. Modeling and seismic response analysis of RC precast Italian code-conforming buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (sup2): 140–67. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1531093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., M. Ercolino, C. Petrone, O. Coppola, and G. Manfredi. 2014a. The Emilia earthquake: Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 30 (2): 891–912. doi: 10.1193/091012EQS285M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., M. Ercolino, M. Cimmino, V. Capozzi, and G. Manfredi. 2014b. FEM analysis of the strength of RC beam-to-column dowel connections under monotonic actions. Construction and Building Materials 69: 271–84. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., V. Capozzi, G. Fabbrocino, and G. Manfredi. 2011. Neoprene–concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing precast buildings. Engineering Structures 33: 532–38. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., and G. L. Fenves. 2013. OpenSees manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Minghini, F., E. Ongaretto, V. Ligabue, M. Savoia, and N. Tullini. 2016. Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Earthquakes and Structures 11 (2): 327–46. doi: 10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastri, E., M. Vergato, and M. Latour. 2017. “Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted R.C. precast industrial building.”. Earthquakes and Structures 12 (1): 13–21. doi: 10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J., R. Monteiro, A. M. B. Nafeh, T. J. Sullivan, and G. M. Calvi. 2020. Displacement-based framework for simplified seismic loss assessment. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–22. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1730272.
   Google Scholar
• Palanci, M., S. M. Senel, and A. Kalkan. 2017. Assessment of one story existing precast industrial buildings in Turkey based on fragility curves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (1): 271–89. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9956-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, A. N., D. Vamvatsikos, and A. K. Kazantzi. 2019. Development and application of FEMA P-58 compatible story loss functions. Earthquake Spectra 35 (1): 95–112. doi: 10.1193/102417EQS222M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savoia, M., C. Mazzotti, N. Buratti, B. Ferracuti, M. Bovo, V. Ligabue, and L. Vincenzi. 2012. Damages and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the Emilia earthquake. Ingegneria Sismica 29 (2–3): 120–31.
   Google Scholar
• Scotta, R., L. De Stefani, and R. Vitaliani. 2015. Passive control of precast building response using cladding panels as dissipative shear walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (11): 3527–52. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9763-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, T. J. 2016. Use of limit state loss versus intensity models for simplified estimation of expected annual loss. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 20 (6): 954–74. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2015.1112325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toniolo, G., and A. Colombo. 2012. Precast concrete structures: The lessons learned from the L’Aquila earthquake. Structural Concrete 13 (2): 73–83. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1751-7648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquati, M., A. Belleri, and P. Riva. 2018. Displacement-based seismic assessment for precast concrete frames with non-emulative connections. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–28. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1475311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., and A. C. Cornell. 2006. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35: 1097–117. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D. P., T. J. Sullivan, and G. M. Calvi. 2014. Developing direct displacement- based procedures for simplified loss assessment in performance-based earthquake engineering. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18: 290–322. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.851046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., H. Zhang, X. Lu, Y. Xu, Z. Zhang, and Y. Li. 2019. A prediction method of building seismic loss based on BIM and FEMA P-58. Automation in Construction 102: 245–57. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoubek, B., M. Fischinger, and T. Isaković. 2016. Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in RC precast building. Engineering Structures 119: 135–48. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoubek, B., M. Fischinger, and T. Isakovic. 2015. Estimation of the cyclic capacity of beam-to-column dowel connections in precast industrial buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13: 2145–68. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9711-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar